ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07842874LOT or NOTUpdated Sep 25, 2026

A Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy vs Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Alone

An interventional study of LOT-CRT-P (Programming: LBBAP) and LOT-CRT-P (Programming: LOT-CRT-P) in Heart Failure, Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, sponsored by PD Dr. Guram Imnadze. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by PD Dr. Guram Imnadze · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 25, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 600 studies in Heart Failure with a site in Germany — 107 open to participants now, 137 under way, 19 of them phase 3. Heart Failure · Germany.

Planned enrollment
218th of 386
124 · median 161
Started
2027
the only one that year
No phase
175 of 600
37 open now
Primary completion
2029-03
later than 107 of 136 live
Registered
599th of 600
by date

Among the 600 studies in Heart Failure with a site in Germany, this one is the 218th largest by planned enrollment of the 386 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2027, is one of 175 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 107 of the 136 other live ones, and was the 599th registered.

Heart Failure

6,332 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,392 are open to participants now.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Open to participants now

107 of the 600 studies in Heart Failure with a site in Germany are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

102 more — sign in →

All 107 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Germany have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Germany →

Who these studies take

Of the 966 Heart Failure studies recruiting now, 689 (71%) set no upper age limit and 89 (9%) stop at 75 or younger; 63 take children under 18; 96 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 600 studies in Heart Failure with a site in Germany, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a promising physiological pacing strategy and may offer advantages over conventional biventricular pacing (BVP), including improved clinical outcomes. However, its effectiveness may be limited in patients with distal conduction system disease, significant endocardial and/or myocardial damage, as well as when direct left bundle branch capture is not achieved. Conventional CRT remains an effective therapy but is associated with procedural challenges and a significant non-responder rate. Current guidelines support the use of LBBAP and BVP either individually or in combination as Left Bundle Branch Optimized CRT (LOT-CRT). Recent data suggest that LOT-CRT may provide superior electrical and hemodynamic resynchronization compared with both LBBAP and BVP. However, there is a lack of randomized trials comparing LBBAP and LOT-CRT in patients with CRT-P indication. The aim of this study is to compare the LOT-CRTP to LBBAP alone.

03

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  • Conduction System Pacing

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years Clinical indication for CRTP implantation according to the current ESC guidelines De novo implantation LBBB (QRS duration ≥130 ms) II-IV

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe mitral or aortic valvular disease History of VT/VF Failed implantation of any component of the LOT-CRTP system/ incompleteness of the system to be implanted Pregnancy \< 1 year Inability to give written consent

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
124 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    LOT group

    LOT group: Implanted with LOT-CRT-P device and programmed with maximum RV-LV synchronization with narrowest QRS complex on the 12-lead ECG.

    Device: LOT-CRT-P (Programming: LOT-CRT-P)

  • Other
    NOT group (LBBAP)

    NOT group: Implanted with LOT-CRT-P device and programmed with LBBAP only along with the backup pacing of LV lead with RV-LV delay of 80-100ms.

    Device: LOT-CRT-P (Programming: LBBAP)

Interventions

  • DeviceLOT-CRT-P (Programming: LBBAP)

    All patients will receive implantation of LOT-CRT-P system consisting of a CRT-P device, CSP lead placed in the LBBAP position in the right ventricle (instead of conventional RV lead), LV lead placed in the coronary sinus, and right atrial lead. Device programming: NOT group: Synchronized with LBBAP only along with the backup pacing of LV lead with RV-LV delay of 80-100ms. After 12 months and study end, each patient receives a personalised and optimally tailored adjustment.

  • DeviceLOT-CRT-P (Programming: LOT-CRT-P)

    Device: LOT-CRT-P (Programming: LOT-CRT-P) All patients will receive implantation of LOT-CRT-P system consisting of a CRT-P device, CSP lead placed in the LBBAP position in the right ventricle (instead of conventional RV lead), LV lead placed in the coronary sinus, and right atrial lead. Device programming: LOT group: Pacing with maximum RV-LV synchronization with narrowest QRS complex on the 12-lead ECG. After 12 months and study end, each patient receives a personalised and optimally tailored adjustment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Status

    Hierarchical clinical composite score: 1. Patients who died for a cardiovascular cause, received a heart transplantation or had an unplanned emergency department visit or hospitalization for heart failure are 'unchanged/worsened'. 2\. Patients who receive a modification of the implanted CRTP system for reasons of presumed inefficacy of the randomized system are 'unchanged/worsened'. 3\. Patients to whom the above does not apply and who have \>20% absolute increase in LVEF at 12 months or earlier are 'markedly improved', and patients who have \<5% absolute increase in LVEF at 12 months are 'unchanged/worsened' 4. Patients to whom the above does not apply the KCCQ-12 overall summary score will be assessed. Those who have ≥ 5 points increase in KCCQ-12 overall summary score are 'markedly improved', and patients who have ≥5 points decrease are 'unchanged/worsened'. 5\. Patients for whom none of the conditions above apply, are 'moderately improved'.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 month follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Electrocardiographic characteristics

    ECG: QRS duration, assessment of LV lateral wall activation time and LV lateral wall to RV septal activation time.

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  2. Echocardiographic characteristics

    left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic/ end-diastolic volume (LVESV/LVEDV), LV EDD, LV ESD.

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  3. NYHA class

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  4. NT-ProBNP

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  5. 6 minutes walking test

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  6. Quality of Life Questionaire

    KCCQ-12

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  7. Worsened heart failure

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  8. Arrhythmic events

    VT/VF/AF occurrence

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

  9. Mortality

    Time frame: enrollment to 12 month follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg
    Neuruppin, Brandenburg 16816, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2027; primary completion for Mar 2029, 25 months later.

Of 1,118 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 25 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2026
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
StartEst.
Feb 2027
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 2029
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07842874
Lead sponsor
PD Dr. Guram Imnadze
Responsible party
PD Dr. Guram Imnadze (Chief Physician of the Medical Clinic A- Rhythmology, Universitatsklinikum Ruppin-Brandenburg GmbH) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Guram PD Dr. Imnadze
Contact
g.imnadze@ukrb.de
+491733728489

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion