CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03404245OPERASUpdated Feb 13, 2026Results posted

an On-demand Program to EmpoweR Active Self-management (OPERAS)

An interventional study of Education, Fitbit/self-management app, physiotherapist counselling. and Same intervention with a 6 month delay in Joint Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-13.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Self-management is a key component of successful chronic disease management and patients can benefit from learning about how daily activities and treatments relate to their symptoms and health status on an ongoing basis. The primary goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of an e-health intervention, OPERAS, which includes two components: 1) the use of a newly developed web app to self-monitor symptoms/disease activity and treatment use, and help patients identify when a medical visit or treatment change is needed; 2) remote activity counselling provided by a physiotherapist, with the use of a wearable device (Fitbit) and the app to provide activity level feedback. The app component of OPERAS is hosted by the secure network of Arthritis Research Canada.

Read the detailed description

Self-management is a fundamental component in arthritis care, however, it is often neglected as most models of arthritis care focus on early access to medical consultation and surgical interventions. Patient self-management refers to the active participation of patients in a variety of activities that contribute to lessening the physical and emotional impact of illnesses. There are several factors attributing to a lack of self-management practice, such as frustration from managing health on a trial-and-error basis, a lack of knowledge to effectively monitor symptoms and disease, and being unsure about how to manage physical activities without aggravating symptoms. The variety of risk factors highlight the need for a multifaceted approach that provides support in terms of knowledge, skill development and timely advice from health professionals, as well as motivational support for patients to be engaged in their care and to stay physically active.

Our primary objective is to assess the efficacy of an e-health intervention, OPERAS, which integrates the Arthritis Health Journal and a Physical Activity Counselling program, to improve self-management ability. Our secondary objectives are to explore the effect of the intervention on disease status and physical activity levels and to assess barriers to implementation and sustainability of the e-health intervention in (rheumatoid arthritis) RA management.

The investigators will use a mixed-methods approach, involving a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and in-depth interviews. The proof-of-concept study will employ a stepped wedge RCT design, whereby the intervention will be sequentially rolled out to participants over a number of time periods. The order in which individuals receive the intervention will be determined at random. The strength of this design is that it can properly address the efficacy question, while avoiding the dilemma of withholding the intervention to some participants, as in a parallel group design.

02

Conditions studied

  • Joint Disease
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • Physical Activity
  • Exercise
  • Rheumatoid
  • Arthritis
  • Self-management
  • Symptoms
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • a physician confirmed diagnosis of RA
  • no joint surgery in the past 6 months
  • no history of acute injury to any joints in the past 6 months
  • an email address and daily access to a computer or mobile device.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • people who should not be physically active without medical supervision.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
132 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Immediate Intervention Group

    Education, Fitbit/self-management web app, physiotherapist counselling. These 3 components will be delivered to the participants in Months 1 and 2. The session will include a short presentation about physical activity in everyday life, an individual goal-setting session with a registered physical therapist (PT), and an orientation to the Fitbit device and the web app. Participants will be provided access to a Fitbit and an app account. The PT will review physical activity goals with participants via bi-weekly phone calls and progressively modify their activities. In Month 3-6, participants will continue using Fitbit and the app and have access to a PT via email as needed, but no phone call. In Months 7-12, participants may keep their Fitbit and app account, but will not have access to a PT.

    Behavioral: Education, Fitbit/self-management app, physiotherapist counselling.

  • Placebo comparator
    Delayed Intervention Group

    Same intervention with a 6 month delay: The full intervention will be initiated in Month 7 and 8 with a brief education session, use of a Fitbit paired with the self-management web app, and counseling by a physical therapist (PT). In Month 9-12, participants will continue the intervention without the PT phone calls, but will have email access to PT, if needed.

    Behavioral: Same intervention with a 6 month delay

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducation, Fitbit/self-management app, physiotherapist counselling.

    Participants will receive a brief education session, use a physical activity tracker Fitbit Flex paired with a self-management app, and remote counseling by a PT. Intervention will be received immediately.

  • BehavioralSame intervention with a 6 month delay

    The Delayed Intervention Group will receive the same intervention as the Immediate Intervention Group, but with a 6 month delay.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Activation Measure

    Patient Activation Measure is a 13-item self-reported measure of individuals' confidence in managing chronic diseases. Each item has a 4-point response (1 "strongly disagree"; 4 "strongly agree"), with the aggregate raw score converted to 0-100. Hibbard et al presented a 4-stage activation model derived from the standardized scores: 1) Believing an active role is important (PAM score \<47); 2) Having confidence and knowledge to take action (47.1 - 55.1); 3) Taking action (55.2 - 67); 4) Maintaining healthy behaviours despite setbacks (\> 67.1).

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index

    Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index consists of: 1) global disease activity; 2) joint tenderness/swelling; 3) pain; 4) morning stiffness; 5) number/severity of painful joints. Score ranges from 0 - 10; lower = better.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks

  2. McGill Pain Questionnaire

    The MPQ-SF contains 15 pain-related words, which can be rated from 0 to 3. Range 0 - 45; higher=more severe pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks

  3. Fatigue Severity Scale

    The Fatigue Severity Scale consists of 9 questions and measures the impact of fatigue. A total score is calculated by averaging the rating from each question. Range 1-7; lower score = less fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks

  4. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 consists of nine questions (rated from 0 to 3) that correspond to nine diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder. Range 0-27; lower score = less depressive symptoms),

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks

  5. The Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Sitting at Work Index

    The SRHI is a 12-item scale, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that measures characteristics of habitual behavior. Participants rated their strength of habit of sitting at work. A higher score indicates a stronger habit or behavior that is done frequently, automatically, and done without thinking about it. Range 1-7; higher score = stronger habit.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks

  6. The Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Sitting at Leisure Index

    The SRHI is a 12-item scale, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that measures characteristics of habitual behavior. Participants rated their strength of habit of sitting at leisure. A higher score indicates a stronger habit or behavior that is done frequently, automatically, and done without thinking about it. Range 1-7; higher score = stronger habit.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks

  7. The Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Walking Index

    The SRHI is a 12-item scale, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that measures characteristics of habitual behavior. Participants rated their strength of walking habit. A higher score indicates a stronger habit or behavior that is done frequently, automatically, and done without thinking about it. Range 1-7; higher score = stronger habit.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks

  8. Daily Time in Moderate/Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)

    Time spent in Moderate/Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) is measured with a SenseWear Mini sensor over a 7-day period. We will calculate the mean time spent in bouted MVPA per day. A bout is defined as \>= 10 consecutive minutes or more at the level of \>= 3 METs (i.e., the lower bound of MVPA), with allowance for interruption of up to one minute below the threshold.

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks

  9. Daily Sedentary Time

    Time spent in sedentary activity is measured with a SenseWear Mini sensor over a 7-day period. We will calculate the mean daily time spent in sedentary activity, with an energy expenditure of \<=1.5 METs, occurring in bouts of \>= 20 minutes during waking hours

    Time frame: Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks

06

Results

Posted Feb 13, 2026
Limitations and caveats
1. Individuals were already activated when they enrolled (high PAM-13 scores); the results may not be generalizable to patients had different needs for self-management support. 2. 92% identified as women; the results may not be generalizable to individuals of other gender identities. 3. Participants' race/ethnicity were not collected; we are unable to comment on the generalizability for different backgrounds.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from rheumatology clinics in Metro Vancouver and through the network of patient groups, including Arthritis Consumer Experts and Arthritis Research Canada's Arthritis Patient Advisory Board. We also posted study information on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Kajiji, and Craigslist) and Arthritis Research Canada's website.

Baseline
Participant flow — Baseline
MilestoneImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Started6666
Completed6566
Not completed10
Withdrew: Erroneously randomized10
Week 27 - Primary Endpoint
Participant flow — Week 27 - Primary Endpoint
MilestoneImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Started6566
Completed5862
Not completed74
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20
Withdrew: Covid related reasons01
Withdrew: Natural disaster evacuation10
Week 53 - Follow-up
Participant flow — Week 53 - Follow-up
MilestoneImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Started5862
Completed5555
Not completed37
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject17
Withdrew: Moved out of province10
Withdrew: Health reason10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPatient Activation Measure

Patient Activation Measure is a 13-item self-reported measure of individuals' confidence in managing chronic diseases. Each item has a 4-point response (1 "strongly disagree"; 4 "strongly agree"), with the aggregate raw score converted to 0-100. Hibbard et al presented a 4-stage activation model derived from the standardized scores: 1) Believing an active role is important (PAM score \<47); 2) Having confidence and knowledge to take action (47.1 - 55.1); 3) Taking action (55.2 - 67); 4) Maintaining healthy behaviours despite setbacks (\> 67.1).

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Activation Measure
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline65.1 ± 13.768.3 ± 13.9
27 weeks69.8 ± 17.267.1 ± 13.5
53 weeks67.3 ± 15.172.2 ± 17.5
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): 6.2 · 95% CI 1.3 to 11.1
SecondaryRheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index

Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index consists of: 1) global disease activity; 2) joint tenderness/swelling; 3) pain; 4) morning stiffness; 5) number/severity of painful joints. Score ranges from 0 - 10; lower = better.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline3.6 ± 1.93.7 ± 1.9
27 weeks3.0 ± 2.03.6 ± 1.8
53 weeks2.8 ± 2.02.8 ± 1.8
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): -0.4 · 95% CI -1.0 to 0.2
SecondaryMcGill Pain Questionnaire

The MPQ-SF contains 15 pain-related words, which can be rated from 0 to 3. Range 0 - 45; higher=more severe pain.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
McGill Pain Questionnaire
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline11.0 ± 8.210.2 ± 7.5
27 weeks9.1 ± 8.010.0 ± 7.1
53 weeks9.2 ± 7.99.5 ± 8.5
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Median difference (net): -1.1 · 95% CI -3.2 to 1.0
SecondaryFatigue Severity Scale

The Fatigue Severity Scale consists of 9 questions and measures the impact of fatigue. A total score is calculated by averaging the rating from each question. Range 1-7; lower score = less fatigue.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Fatigue Severity Scale
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline4.7 ± 1.44.6 ± 1.3
27 weeks4.3 ± 1.54.6 ± 1.3
53 weeks4.5 ± 1.54.4 ± 1.5
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Median difference (net): -0.3 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.0
SecondaryThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The PHQ-9 consists of nine questions (rated from 0 to 3) that correspond to nine diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder. Range 0-27; lower score = less depressive symptoms),

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline7.6 ± 5.67.0 ± 4.9
27 weeks5.0 ± 3.86.3 ± 5.3
53 weeks4.8 ± 4.05.4 ± 5.0
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Median difference (net): -1.8 · 95% CI -3.3 to -0.2
SecondaryThe Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Sitting at Work Index

The SRHI is a 12-item scale, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that measures characteristics of habitual behavior. Participants rated their strength of habit of sitting at work. A higher score indicates a stronger habit or behavior that is done frequently, automatically, and done without thinking about it. Range 1-7; higher score = stronger habit.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Sitting at Work Index
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline4.6 ± 1.44.7 ± 1.7
27 weeks4.6 ± 1.44.6 ± 1.6
53 weeks4.5 ± 1.64.6 ± 1.8
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Median difference (net): 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
SecondaryThe Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Sitting at Leisure Index

The SRHI is a 12-item scale, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that measures characteristics of habitual behavior. Participants rated their strength of habit of sitting at leisure. A higher score indicates a stronger habit or behavior that is done frequently, automatically, and done without thinking about it. Range 1-7; higher score = stronger habit.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Sitting at Leisure Index
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline4.5 ± 1.44.6 ± 1.3
27 weeks4.5 ± 1.14.7 ± 1.5
53 weeks4.4 ± 1.34.6 ± 1.6
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): -0.2 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.2
SecondaryThe Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Walking Index

The SRHI is a 12-item scale, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that measures characteristics of habitual behavior. Participants rated their strength of walking habit. A higher score indicates a stronger habit or behavior that is done frequently, automatically, and done without thinking about it. Range 1-7; higher score = stronger habit.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 52 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
The Self-Reported Habit Index (SRHI) - Walking Index
score on a scaleImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline4.5 ± 1.64.5 ± 1.8
27 weeks4.6 ± 1.74.3 ± 1.9
53 weeks4.8 ± 1.64.7 ± 1.7
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): 0.3 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.8
SecondaryDaily Time in Moderate/Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)

Time spent in Moderate/Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) is measured with a SenseWear Mini sensor over a 7-day period. We will calculate the mean time spent in bouted MVPA per day. A bout is defined as \>= 10 consecutive minutes or more at the level of \>= 3 METs (i.e., the lower bound of MVPA), with allowance for interruption of up to one minute below the threshold.

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Daily Time in Moderate/Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)
minutesImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline36.8 ± 35.938.4 ± 38.6
27 weeks42.0 ± 41.545.5 ± 54.5
53 weeks42.4 ± 44.047.8 ± 55.8
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): 2.5 · 95% CI -10.1 to 15.1
SecondaryDaily Sedentary Time

Time spent in sedentary activity is measured with a SenseWear Mini sensor over a 7-day period. We will calculate the mean daily time spent in sedentary activity, with an energy expenditure of \<=1.5 METs, occurring in bouts of \>= 20 minutes during waking hours

Time frame:
Baseline, 27 weeks, 53 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Daily Sedentary Time
minutesImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Baseline514.9 ± 176.1467.8 ± 175.2
27 weeks539.8 ± 186.9504.2 ± 184.4
53 weeks546.7 ± 163.2504.0 ± 164.2
Statistical analysis
  • Immediate Intervention Group vs Delayed Intervention Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): -57.5 · 95% CI -112.9 to -2.0

Adverse events

Collected over 53 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Immediate Intervention Group0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)3/65 (4.6%)
Delayed Intervention Group0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)2/66 (3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventImmediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention Group
Falls, unrelated to the interventionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/652/66
Muscle painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/650/66

Baseline characteristics

One individual in the Immediate Group revealed that he did not have RA after randomization; hence, 131 were included in the analysis (Immediate: 65, Delayed: 66).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Mean54.8 ± 13.156.9 ± 13.255.8 ± 13.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Female6060120
Male5611
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
Marital status
Marital status(Participants)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Married/Common law444488
Separated/Divorced14923
Widowed/Never married71320
Gross annual household Income in Canadian dollars
Gross annual household Income in Canadian dollars(Participants)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
$40 000 or under111122
$40 001-$80 000121628
Over $80 000372562
No answer51419
Disease duration
Disease duration(Years)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Mean9.2 ± 10.911.7 ± 11.210.5 ± 11.0
Body mass index
Body mass index(kg/m2)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Mean27.7 ± 6.826.0 ± 6.026.9 ± 6.4
Experience with health apps
Experience with health apps(Participants)Immediate Intervention GroupDelayed Intervention GroupTotal
Less than 1 year373673
1-3 years101323
4 or more years11920
No answer7815

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arthritis Research Canada
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 3P2, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Feehan L, Xie H, Lu N, Li LC. Twenty-four hour physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep profiles in adults living with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional latent class analysis. J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Apr 17;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00049-5. PubMed 40217417 ↗
  • Tam J, Lacaille D, Liu-Ambrose T, Shaw C, Xie H, Backman CL, Esdaile JM, Miller K, Petrella R, Li LC. Effectiveness of an online self-management tool, OPERAS (an On-demand Program to EmpoweR Active Self-management), for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a research protocol. Trials. 2019 Dec 11;20(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3851-0. PubMed 31829286 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 22, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03404245
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Collaborators
Simon Fraser University, Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver General Hospital, The Arthritis Society, Canada, Fraser Health
Responsible party
Linda Li (Professor, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 19, 2018
Start date
Jan 23, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2022
Completion
Jan 31, 2023
Results posted
Feb 13, 2026
Last update
Feb 13, 2026

Study contacts

Linda Li, PhD
principal investigator · Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion