ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03391908MultiPlaqueUpdated Aug 2, 2022

Multiomics and Imaging-based Assessment of Vulnerable Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndromes

An observational study in Coronary Stenosis, Acute Coronary Syndrome and Acute Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Cardio Med Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Romania. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-02.

Sponsored by Cardio Med Medical Center · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of Multiplaque clinical study is to assess the vulnerability degree of the atheromatous plaques, before and after a myocardial infarction (MI), based on multiomics analysis, associated with invasive and non-invasive data. In this study, a multi-parametric model for risk prediction will be developed, for evaluation of the risk that is associated with the vulnerable coronary plaques in patients that have suffered an acute coronary syndrome.

In the study, evaluation of the imaging characteristics of these coronary plaques will be performed with the use of CT, OCT, IVUS and invasive angiography. We will study the correlation between plaque evolution and (1) the degree of vulnerability at baseline, (2) multiomics profile of the patients and (3) clinical evolution during follow-up.

Also, new techniques for evaluation of the functional significance of coronary stenoses will be studied and validated, such as calculation of the fractional flow reserve or determination of shear stress in areas that are localized within the near vicinity of the vulnerable coronary plaques.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective cohort monocentric study.

The primary objective of this study is to research the vulnerability degree of ateromatous plaques before and after a myocardial infarction, based on multiomics data, invasive and non-invasive imaging data, in order to characterize the vulnerable coronary plaque and the vulnerable patient, in patients who have suffered an acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction).

The secondary objectives of the study are:

  • Evaluation of factors associated with the risk for reinfarction in patients with vulnerable plaques, according to their imaging characteristics of vulnerability.
  • Evaluation of predictive factors for reinfarction in patients with vulnerable plaques, according to the multiomics profile of the patient.
  • Determination of the rate of adverse events and MACE rates (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) according to the vulnerability degree of the coronary plaque at the index moment.
  • Evaluation of the efficiency of new methodologies for assessing vulnerable plaques: coronary shear stress determination, trans-stenotic contrast gradient, quantification of coronary plaque components through CT, OCT and IVUS.
  • Evaluation of the efficiency of non-invasive methodologies for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses.

Study population: The study lot will be comprised by 100 patients out of which:

  • lot 1 (substudy 1) - 50 patients with unstable angina type acute coronary syndrome
  • lot 2 (substudy 2) - 50 patients with acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) that occurred 30 days before randomization.

Study design and procedures:

Substudy 1: Research of vulnerable plaques in patients with ACS - Unstable angina

Baseline- Day 1: The following procedures will be performed at baseline:

  • Personal data recording (age, gender, address, contact);
  • anamnesis, cardiovascular risk assessment, comorbidities;
  • Physical examination
  • Laboratory analysis (biochemistry Cell blood count, troponin assay, hsCRP, matrix metalloproteinases, miRNAs, multiomic analysis)
  • ECG
  • Echocardiography (LVEF, chamber volumes and diameters, transmitral valvular flow, pulmonary artery pressure, 3D analysis of the regional kinetics with speckle tracking and tissue Doppler, evaluation of valvular regurgitation)
  • Myocardial perfusion echocardiography
  • Cardiac computed tomography
  • Perfusion CT
  • Coronary Angiography +/- stent implantation for the culprit lesion
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Intravascular ultrasound

Follow-up:

  • Month 1 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation
  • Month 3 - telephone follow-up
  • Month 6 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation
  • Month 12 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation
  • Month 15 - telephone follow-up
  • Month 18 - telephone follow-up
  • Month 24 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation, Cardiac Computed Tomography, Perfusion CT

Substudy 2: Research of remaining vulnerable plaques in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI), with maximum 30 days before the enrollment. The index event is considered to be the acute myocardial infarction.

Baseline - day 1: The following procedures will be performed at baseline:

  • Personal data recording (age, gender, address, contact);
  • Anamnesis, cardiovascular risk assessment, comorbidities;
  • Physical examination;
  • Laboratory analysis (biochemistry, Cell blood count, troponin assay, hsCRP, matrix metalloproteinases, miRNAs, multiomic analysis)
  • ECG
  • Echocardiography (LVEF, chamber volumes and diameters, transmitral valvular flow, pulmonary artery pressure, 3D analysis of the regional kinetics with speckle tracking and tissue Doppler, evaluation of valvular regurgitation)
  • Myocardial perfusion echocardiography
  • Cardiac computed tomography
  • Perfusion CT
  • Coronary Angiography +/- stent implantation for the culprit lesion
  • Optical coherence tomography

Follow-up:

  • Month 1 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation
  • Month 3 - telephone follow-up
  • Month 6 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation
  • Month 12 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation
  • Month 15 - telephone follow-up
  • Month 18 - telephone follow-up
  • Month 24 - anamnesis, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, end-point evaluation, Cardiac Computed Tomography, Perfusion CT
02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Stenosis
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction
  • Atheromatous Plaques
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Unstable Angina
  • Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • vulnerable plaque, ACS, NSTEMI, vulnerable patient
03

In context

Coronary Stenosis

326 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Stenosis; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 125 observational studies indexed under Coronary Stenosis.

Browse Coronary Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Cardio Med Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study lot will be comprised by 100 patients out of which:

  • lot 1 (substudy 1) - 50 patients with unstable angina type acute coronary syndrome
  • lot 2 (substduy 2) - 50 patients with acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) that occurred 30 days before randomization.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Substudy 1:

  • Patients aged at least 18 years
  • Patients who have signed the
  • Unstable angina type acute coronary syndrome with maximum 48h before presentation, defined as the presence of typical angina pain, with duration of more than 5 minute, accompanied by changes.

Substudy 2:

  • Patients aged at least 18 years
  • Patients who have signed the informed consent
  • Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) defined as typical changes on the ECG (ST elevation of minimum 1 mm in at least 2 consecutive leads - STEMI; ST-T changes for NSTEMI) accompanied by increased levels of cardiac troponin I or T, or CK-MB of more than 2x the normal reference value of the laboratory.

Exclusion Criteria: (for both substudies)

  • Known sensibility for the contrast agents
  • Women at reproductive age who does not use methods
  • Pregnant women
  • Any within the last 5 years
  • Acute or chronic renal failure
  • Any disease or comorbidity that reduces the under 2 years
  • Non-compliant patients who, in the opinion of the investigators, will not undergo the follow-up process
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • MP - SG 01

    Patients with unstable angina type acute coronary syndrome: patients aged at least 18 years, who have signed the informed consent, and present an unstable angina-type acute coronary syndrome with maximum 48h before presentation, defined as the presence of typical angina pain, with duration of more than 5 minute, accompanied by ECG changes.

    Diagnostic Test: cardiac imaging tests

  • MP - SG 02

    Patients with acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) that occurred 30 days before randomization: patients aged at least 18 years, who have signed the informed consent, and present with acute myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) defined as typical changes on the ECG (ST elevation of minimum 1 mm in at least 2 consecutive leads - STEMI; ST-T changes for NSTEMI) accompanied by increased levels of cardiac troponin I or T, or CK-MB of more than 2x the normal reference value of the laboratory.

    Diagnostic Test: cardiac imaging tests

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testcardiac imaging tests

    Patients will undergo non-invasive Cardiac Computed Tomography for assessment of coronary plaques and myocardial perfusion, and invasive intracoronary imaging tests (coronary angiography, Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and FFR). If imaging will reveal existence of a significant coronary plaque, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI - stenting) will be performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. rate of major clinical endpoints - acute myocardial infarction - occuring in the follow-up period

    The rate of infarction (in the group of unstable angina) or re-infarction (in the group with already established myocardial infarction) will be assessed during the 2-year follow-up and correlated with the degree of plaque vulnerability as determined by imaging tests.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Revascularization rate

    The need for revascularization of the culprit lesion and of the non-culprit lesions will be assessed during the 2-year follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Rate of progression of the vulnerability degree of the coronary plaques

    The vulnerability degree of each coronary lesion will be assessed by Cardiac CT at base-line and at 1-year follow-up, and the progression/regression of the vulnerability degree will be calculated

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. MACE rates (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events)

    Major adverse cardiac events represented by cardiac death, all-cause death, rehospitalization rate, target vessel revascularization and re-infarction rate

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cardio Med SRL
    Târgu-Mureş, Mures 540136, Romania
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker of plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55(1):22-8. doi: 10.1536/ihj.13-213. Epub 2014 Jan 27. PubMed 24463925 ↗
  • Benedek T, Gyongyosi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Mar;29(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004. Epub 2013 Jan 17. PubMed 23333164 ↗
  • Benedek I, Bucur O, Benedek T. Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear bone marrow-derived stem cells is associated with a lower plaque burden after four years. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21(3):217-29. doi: 10.5551/jat.19745. Epub 2013 Oct 12. PubMed 24126180 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be made available to other researchers from the same research group and to other collaborating groups and can be used for further statistical sub-analysis

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data will become available immediately after completion of the enrolment and will remain available for at least 5 years

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 29 months.

Of 58 observational studies under Coronary Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 143. This study's 29 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 31, 2017
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
StartActual
Apr 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2021
Last update
Aug 2, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03391908
Lead sponsor
Cardio Med Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2020
Completion
Jan 31, 2021
Last update
Aug 2, 2022

Study contacts

Theodora Benedek, MD,Prof
principal investigator · University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tirgu Mures, CardioMed Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion