ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07868523REVEAL-DCB-AUpdated Oct 9, 2026

The PICCOLETO XIII REVEAL-DCB Cohort A Study

An observational study in Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis and Coronary Restenosis, sponsored by Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare ETS. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare ETS · Observational

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To characterize, using paired coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), longitudinal changes in coronary atherosclerotic plaque, lumen dimensions, and vessel remodeling between baseline and mid-term follow-up in de novo coronary lesions successfully treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only angioplasty. No additional imaging examination, intervention, or clinical visit is mandated by the study protocol.

Read the detailed description

PICCOLETO XIII REVEAL-DCB Cohort A is an investigator-initiated, retrospective, international, multicenter observational cohort study evaluating CCTA-derived plaque and vessel changes after DCB-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo coronary lesions.

Drug-coated balloons have become an established option within the contemporary PCI armamentarium, in line with the "leave nothing behind" treatment strategy. By delivering an antiproliferative agent directly to the vessel wall without permanent implantation of a metallic scaffold, DCB aim to limit neointimal proliferation while promoting positive vessel remodeling, preserving native vessel physiology and the option for future revascularization.

Serial angiographic and intracoronary imaging studies have described late lumen enlargement after DCB angioplasty, suggesting that the biological response to DCB treatment extends beyond the prevention of restenosis. However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, and in particular the longitudinal changes in atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition after DCB treatment, remain incompletely characterized.

CCTA provides a unique opportunity to investigate these processes noninvasively. Beyond assessment of luminal stenosis, contemporary CCTA allows quantitative characterization of vessel dimensions, total and component-specific plaque volumes and plaque burden, assessment of plaque phenotypes and high-risk plaque features, assessment of plaque remodeling and of changes in plaque composition during follow-up, and pre-procedural CCTA-assisted DCB angioplasty. Importantly, the absence of a permanent metallic scaffold after DCB-only PCI avoids stent-related blooming and beam-hardening artifacts, allowing direct serial assessment of both the coronary lumen and the vessel wall within the treated segment.

Consecutive patients undergoing successful DCB-only PCI for a de novo coronary lesion will be identified from participating centers. Eligible patients will have either a diagnostic-quality CCTA performed before the index PCI and/or a diagnostic-quality follow-up CCTA performed within 12 months (minimum 3 months). If available, baseline and follow-up CCTA examinations will be anatomically matched at the lesion level to enable paired quantitative assessment of the same DCB-treated coronary segment over time. All imaging, procedural, and clinical data will derive from examinations and medical records obtained during routine clinical care.

Baseline and follow-up CCTA examinations will be analyzed using a standardized protocol by an expert and independent core laboratory. Whenever feasible, paired examinations will be evaluated using the same dedicated quantitative plaque-analysis software, with comparable reconstruction parameters, and analyses will be performed by investigators blinded to procedural strategy and clinical outcomes.

This is an exploratory, hypothesis-generating retrospective study which does not require sample sizing assumptions. Its first aim is to understand the current state of the art in order to develop prospective studies with rigorous protocols.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Stenosis
  • Coronary Restenosis
  • Coronary Atherosclerosis
  • Vascular Remodeling

Keywords

  • Drug-Coated Balloon
  • Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
  • De Novo Coronary Lesion
  • Plaque Volume
  • Plaque Composition
  • Vessel Remodeling
  • Late Lumen Enlargement
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • CAD-RADS
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,676 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 958 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 335 across 1,978 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare ETS is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with coronary artery disease who underwent successful DCB-only PCI for at least 1 de novo coronary lesion at participating centers, with either a diagnostic-quality CCTA performed before the index PCI and/or a diagnostic-quality follow-up CCTA performed within 12 months (minimum 3 months).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Presence of ≥1 de novo coronary lesion treated with successful DCB-only PCI
  • No stent implantation within the target segment during the index procedure
  • Diagnostic-quality CCTA performed before the index PCI and/or diagnostic-quality follow-up CCTA performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty
  • Adequate visualization of the target vessel and treated segment on the available CCTA examination(s) to permit quantitative analysis
  • Availability of the index PCI angiogram and sufficient procedural data to identify the DCB-treated segment
  • Successful index PCI with an acceptable final angiographic result and stable clinical status at discharge

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In-stent restenosis as the target lesion
  • Bailout or planned stent implantation within the target segment during the index procedure
  • CCTA of insufficient diagnostic quality for quantitative analysis of the target segment because of severe calcification, motion artifact, misregistration, or other technical limitations
  • Follow-up CCTA performed outside the prespecified time window
  • Target-lesion revascularization before the scheduled follow-up CCTA, precluding paired imaging assessment of the untreated follow-up state
  • Inability to reliably identify and match the DCB-treated coronary segment between the index angiogram and baseline/follow-up CCTA
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months from a non-cardiac cause
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • DCB-only PCI cohort

    Adult patients who underwent successful drug-coated balloon-only PCI of at least 1 de novo coronary lesion, with a diagnostic-quality CCTA performed before the index PCI and/or a diagnostic-quality follow-up CCTA performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty, as part of routine clinical care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in CCTA-Derived Total Coronary Plaque Volume (mm³)

    Absolute change in total coronary plaque volume, expressed in cubic millimeters (mm³), within the DCB-treated coronary segment, calculated as follow-up total plaque volume minus baseline total plaque volume, as measured by an independent CCTA core laboratory.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in CCTA-Derived Calcified Plaque Volume (mm³)

    Absolute change in calcified plaque volume, expressed in mm³, within the DCB-treated coronary segment, calculated as follow-up minus baseline calcified plaque volume.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  2. Number of Lesions With Binary Restenosis at Follow-up (≥50% Diameter Stenosis)

    Number of DCB-treated lesions with ≥50% diameter stenosis on follow-up CCTA.

    Time frame: Follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  3. Change in CCTA-Derived Noncalcified Plaque Volume (mm³)

    Absolute change in noncalcified plaque volume, expressed in mm³, within the DCB-treated coronary segment, calculated as follow-up minus baseline noncalcified plaque volume.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  4. Change in CCTA-Derived Low-Attenuation Plaque Volume (mm³)

    Absolute change in low-attenuation plaque volume, expressed in mm³, within the DCB-treated coronary segment, calculated as follow-up minus baseline low-attenuation plaque volume.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  5. Change in Calcified Plaque Volume as a Percentage of Total Plaque Volume (%)

    Change in the proportion of calcified plaque volume relative to total plaque volume within the DCB-treated coronary segment, expressed in percentage points, calculated as follow-up percentage minus baseline percentage.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  6. Change in Noncalcified Plaque Volume as a Percentage of Total Plaque Volume (%)

    Change in the proportion of noncalcified plaque volume relative to total plaque volume within the DCB-treated coronary segment, expressed in percentage points, calculated as follow-up percentage minus baseline percentage.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  7. Change in Low-Attenuation Plaque Volume as a Percentage of Total Plaque Volume (%)

    Change in the proportion of low-attenuation plaque volume relative to total plaque volume within the DCB-treated coronary segment, expressed in percentage points, calculated as follow-up percentage minus baseline percentage.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  8. Change in CCTA-Derived Minimal Lumen Area (mm²)

    Absolute change in minimal lumen area, expressed in mm², within the DCB-treated coronary segment, calculated as follow-up minus baseline minimal lumen area.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  9. Change in CCTA-Derived Vessel Remodeling Index

    Absolute change in the vessel remodeling index, defined as the ratio of lesion-site vessel area to reference-segment vessel area (a dimensionless ratio), within the DCB-treated coronary segment, calculated as follow-up minus baseline remodeling index.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  10. Number of Lesions With a Change in Predominant Plaque Composition Category

    Number of DCB-treated lesions in which the predominant plaque composition category (calcified, noncalcified, or mixed), assigned at baseline CCTA, differs from the category assigned at follow-up CCTA.

    Time frame: Baseline to follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  11. Number of Lesions With Positive Remodeling at Follow-up

    Number of DCB-treated lesions classified as showing positive remodeling on follow-up CCTA, per the remodeling index threshold prespecified in the study protocol.

    Time frame: Follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  12. Number of Lesions With Low-Attenuation Plaque at Follow-up

    Number of DCB-treated lesions with low-attenuation plaque identified on follow-up CCTA.

    Time frame: Follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  13. Number of Lesions With Spotty Calcification at Follow-up

    Number of DCB-treated lesions with spotty calcification identified on follow-up CCTA.

    Time frame: Follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

  14. Number of Lesions With Napkin-Ring Sign at Follow-up

    Number of DCB-treated lesions with a napkin-ring sign identified on follow-up CCTA.

    Time frame: Follow-up CCTA, performed 3 to 12 months after DCB angioplasty.

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure

    Clinical Outcome Measure - Number of participants experiencing target lesion failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  2. Number of Participants With Any Myocardial Infarction (Target-Vessel or Non-Target-Vessel)

    Clinical Outcome Measure - Number of participants experiencing myocardial infarction attributable to any coronary territory, target-vessel or non-target-vessel.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  3. Number of Participants With BARC Type ≥3 Major Bleeding

    Clinical Outcome Measure - Number of participants experiencing Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥3 bleeding, as defined in the study protocol.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  4. Number of Participants With All-Cause Death

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  5. Number of Participants With Cardiac Death

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  6. Number of Participants With Target-Vessel Myocardial Infarction

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  7. Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Vessel Revascularization

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  9. Number of Participants Hospitalized for Unstable Angina

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

  10. Number of Participants With Stroke

    Clinical Outcome Measure.

    Time frame: 12 months.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lazar FL, Onea HL, Olinic DM, Cortese B. A 2024 scientific update on the clinical performance of drug-coated balloons. AsiaIntervention. 2024 Feb 29;10(1):15-25. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00010. eCollection 2024 Feb. PubMed 38425817 ↗
  • Fezzi S, Scheller B, Cortese B, Alfonso F, Jeger R, Colombo A, Joner M, Shin ES, Kleber FX, Latib A, Rissanen TT, Eccleshall S, Ribichini F, Tao L, Koo BK, Chieffo A, Ge J, Granada JF, Stoll HP, Spaulding C, Cavalcante R, Abizaid A, Muramatsu T, Boudoulas KD, Waksman R, Mehran R, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Stone GW, Garg S, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Definitions and standardized endpoints for the use of drug-coated balloon in coronary artery disease: consensus document of the Drug Coated Balloon Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2025 Jul 7;46(26):2498-2519. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf029. PubMed 40270117 ↗
  • Yamamoto M, Hara H, Kubota S, Hiroi Y. Predictors of late lumen enlargement after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for de novo coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2024 May 10;20(9):602-612. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00849. PubMed 38726721 ↗
  • Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, Kawashima H, Norgaard BL, Dweck MR, Bax JJ, Knuuti J, Nieman K, Leipsic JA, Mushtaq S, Andreini D, Onuma Y. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Complete Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 17;78(7):713-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019. PubMed 34384554 ↗
  • Nieman K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Hideo-Kajita A, Collet C, Dey D, Pugliese F, Weissman G, Tijssen JGP, Leipsic J, Opolski MP, Ferencik M, Lu MT, Williams MC, Bruining N, Blanco PJ, Maurovich-Horvat P, Achenbach S. Standards for quantitative assessments by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA): An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 Sep-Oct;18(5):429-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.05.232. Epub 2024 Jun 6. PubMed 38849237 ↗
  • Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, Budoff M, Chinnaiyan K, Choi AD, Ghoshhajra B, Jacobs J, Koweek L, Lesser J, Maroules C, Rubin GD, Rybicki FJ, Shaw LJ, Williams MC, Williamson E, White CS, Villines TC, Blankstein R. CAD-RADS 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Nov;15(11):1974-2001. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Sep 14. PubMed 36115815 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request after study completion and primary publication, subject to appropriate data use agreements, applicable data protection legislation, and ethics committee approval.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07868523
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare ETS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Beatrice Barbano
Contact
segreteria@fondazioneric.org
+39 329 876 8658
Bernardo Cortese, MD
study chair · Fondazione Ricerca e Innovazione Cardiovascolare ETS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion