ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03361410Updated Feb 21, 2023

Impact of Grape Consumption on Brain Metabolism and Neuropsychological Performance Over 1 Year

A Phase 2 interventional study of Grape Powder and Placebo Powder in Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-21.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 21 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction by University of California, Los Angeles — 3 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Cognitive Dysfunction · University of California, Los Angeles.

Enrollment
11th of 18
32 · median 58
Started
2017
the only one that year
Phase 2
2 of 21
none open now
Registered
12th of 21
by date

Among the 21 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction by University of California, Los Angeles, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment of the 18 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 2 in phase 2, and was the 12th registered.

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,875 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,121 are open to participants now.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 21 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction by University of California, Los Angeles are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 751 Cognitive Dysfunction studies recruiting now, 363 (48%) set no upper age limit and 143 (19%) stop at 75 or younger; 46 take children under 18; 259 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 65 Years to 85 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 21 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction by University of California, Los Angeles, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Constituents of grapes have been studied for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticarcinogenic properties. In the past decade, there has been emerging evidence regarding a potential role for grapes in slowing cognitive decline and other effects of aging. Furthermore, evidence has been obtained in vivo that supplementation with grape seed extract in aged rats improves cognitive performance, and that supplementation with grapes in people having decline in cognition leads to preservation of metabolism in brain regions important to cognitive function over a period of six months. The investigator aims to measure effects of grape intake on cerebral metabolism and neuropsychological performance, and to determine whether initial patterns, and magnitude of change, of cerebral metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) can serve respectively as a predictor of, and biomarker for, the magnitude of cognitive changes resulting from intake of grapes over a period of at least one year.

Read the detailed description

As the number of people age 65 years old or older continues to increase, population aging has a profound impact on healthcare systems, and specifically the emergence of dementia in literally epidemic proportions. Numerous studies on the associations between grape consumption and dementia and Alzheimer's disease have found evidence to support the use of grapes and grape products as a safe and effective way to treat and delay the onset of dementia. For the present study, the Investigator aims (1) to identify regional cerebral metabolic changes associated with grape intake, (2) to determine whether the presence and magnitude of therapeutic responses to grape in patients undergoing neuroimaging evaluation for cognitive decline can be predicted by particular patterns of regional brain metabolism, and (3) to statistically assess the relationships between brain metabolism assessed by PET and cognitive function in randomized experimental arms. A total of 32 patients from a community sample of patients referred to UCLA NeuroPET Clinics by their neurologists for further evaluation by brain imaging will be studied in this placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. Subjects who have met the screening criteria will be randomized to receive 72 g of grape powder or placebo, reconstituted in water, per day. Regional brain metabolism will be measured with a PET scanner, and cognitive function will be measured by a neuropsychologic test battery assessed at baseline, 6 months following initiation of consumption, and 1 year following initiation of consumption of the grapes of placebo formulation.

03

Conditions studied

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Mild Decline in Cognition
  • Mild Cognitive Decline
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Dementia
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
  • F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)
  • Cerebral Metabolism
  • Dietary Supplement
  • MCI
  • MDC
  • Grape
  • Memory
  • Randomized
  • Non-Drug
  • Supplement
  • Non-Pharmacologic
  • Natural
  • Red Wine
  • Free
  • UCLA
  • Brain Scan
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Brain Diseases
  • Central Nervous System Diseases
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive
  • Neurocognitive
  • Neurodegenerative
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Referred to the UCLA NeuroPET Clinics for concern of cognitive decline and/or behavioral changes.
  • Standard history, physical, and laboratory screen performed to identify possible presence of depression, substance abuse, malnourishment, medical effects and interactions, cardiopulmonary compromise, electrolyte/calcium imbalance, anemia, hypoxemia, infection, thyroid dysfunction, renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, or glucose dysregulation, and appropriate therapies administered (if any).
  • Appropriate neurological consultation has been obtained, as well as CT/MRI and/or neurosurgical consultation if history or neurologic exam reveal findings suspicious for stroke, tumor, bleed, ictal activity, or hydrocephalus.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects under age 65 and over age 85, in order to enhance the clinical relevance of the project by focusing on the age groups in whom serious concerns about early signs and symptoms of senile onset dementia are most typically emerging.
  • Have begun cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine in the last 6 months.
  • Patient lacks adequate functional status and/or caregiver support to reliably follow grape consumption regimen.
  • Claustrophobia or other condition that would preclude PET from being acquired, or visual, auditory, language, or motor deficits that would preclude accurate neuropsychological testing.
  • Non-English speaking subjects, due to lack of neuropsychologic testing or equivalent instruments in non-English languages.
  • Subjects with a history of allergy to grapes or grape products.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Grape Powder

    Dietary Supplement: Grape Powder

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Powder

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo Powder

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementGrape Powder

    36 g of grape powder to be taken twice/day (total of 72 g/day) for 12 months

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo Powder

    36 g of placebo powder to be taken twice/day (total of 72 g/day) for 12 months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Regional Cerebral Metabolism

    Changes from baseline in regional cerebral metabolism

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures

    Changes in cognitive performance over time within each group will be measured through the neuropsychological assessments listed below, as administered by trained psychometrists under direct supervision of a licensed neuropsychologist, and will be correlated with changes in regional cerebral metabolism.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  2. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Mini-Mental State Examination

    Mini-Mental State Examination (Folstein, 1975)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  3. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) Digit Span

    Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III) Digit Span (Wechsler, 1997)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  4. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Trail Making Test Part B

    Trail Making Test Part B (Reitan, 1958)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  5. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Functional Activities Questionnaire

    Functional Activities Questionnaire (Pfeffer et al., 1982)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  6. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Verbal Memory

    NeuroTrax BrainCare, a cloud-based computer application that includes a series of tests and associated reports, will be used to measure Verbal Memory.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  7. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Non-Verbal Memory

    Non-Verbal Memory (measured using the NeuroTrax BrainCare application)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  8. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Verbal Function

    Verbal Function (measured using the NeuroTrax BrainCare application)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  9. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Stroop Interference

    Stroop Interference (measured using the NeuroTrax BrainCare application)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  10. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Problem Solving

    Problem Solving (measured using the NeuroTrax BrainCare application)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

  11. Changes in neuropsychological performance measures: Visual Spatial Processing

    Visual Spatial Processing (measured using the NeuroTrax BrainCare application)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 58 months.

Of 145 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Cognitive Dysfunction, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 64. This study's 58 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 186 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 62.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2017
First posted
Dec 4, 2017
StartActual
Nov 18, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 15, 2022
CompletionActual
Oct 15, 2022
Last update
Feb 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03361410
Collaborators
California Table Grape Commission
Responsible party
Daniel H. Silverman (Professor, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 4, 2017
Start date
Nov 18, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2022
Completion
Oct 15, 2022
Last update
Feb 21, 2023

Study contacts

Daniel H Silverman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Grape

Start the discussion