CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06507254MAEVEUpdated Jun 11, 2026

Polyphenols and Cognitive Decline

An interventional study of Polyphenol Supplement and Placebo Supplement in Cognitive Decline and Cognitive Dysfunction, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Globally, populations are aging thereby increasing healthcare burden, overall cognitive impairment, and dementia including Alzheimers diseases (AD). The lack of effective treatments makes it essential to develop new strategies for healthy cognitive aging, including interventions to slow or prevent cognitive decline. A traditional Mediterranean diet, rich in polyphenols (PPs), may prevent or delay the onset of cognitive dysfunction in older adults, preserving healthy brain structure and function, and lowering the risk of AD. These effects, mediated in part by gut microbiome-derived PP metabolites, highlight the role alterations in the brain-gut microbiome system play in neurodegeneration. Moreover, high levels of circulating phenyl-y-valerolactones, neuroprotective compounds, exclusively produced by gut microbiota from flavan-3-ol-rich foods (e.g., cocoa, tea, berries) are associated with delaying the onset of cognitive dysfunction in older adults. Intake of such PPs can also change gut microbial composition and function, altering the physiology of the hosts secondary bile acid (BA) pool, affecting regulatory and signaling functions in the brain as well as cognitive decline and AD. The investigators hypothesize that, in older adults with enhanced AD risk, dietary intake of PPs maintains healthier brain features and cognitive function, and that this beneficial effect is mediated by gut microbiota metabolites of PPs and BAs.

In this multi-PI application by leaders in the field of brain-gut microbiome interactions, the investigators will conduct a year-long, multi-center, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study in 300 older adults in the United States (validation sample of 100 from Northern Ireland) who are at enhanced risk of developing AD. Ultimately, the investigators will establish the protective effects of regular dietary PP intake on cognitive function and on brain-gut microbiome interactions, ideally allowing the development of effective dietary regimes to prevent of delay the onset of AD in at-risk elderly, thereby reducing cognitive decline and healthcare costs.

Participants will be asked to provide information about their diet, mood, and behaviors via food diaries, physical body measures (e.g. height, weight, etc.), and online questionnaires collected before each in-clinic appointment, as well as monthly online questionnaires. MR imaging will be collected on participants to assess neurocognitive changes as a result of the supplement. Participants will be asked to provide both stool and blood samples. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Juice Plus+ intervention group or the placebo treatment group and then asked to take their respective supplement 4 pills twice a day. All participants will be asked to come in for 4 in-clinic appointments, including 3 brain MRI scans and 3 cognitive testing appointments, collect 3 stool samples with corresponding diet diaries, and provide 3 blood samples over the course of 12 months. Participants will also meet with a nutritionist 3 times over the 12 months to discuss diet to ensure study eligibility and any questions about the supplement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Decline
  • Cognitive Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Polyphenols
  • Mediterranean Diet
  • Gut Microbiome
  • Alzheimers Disease
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,100 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 65 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 50+ Years of age
  • Male or Female
  • At enhanced risk of Alzheimer's Disease (defined as family history of AD, 1st degree family member)
  • Habitually consume suboptimal diets such as typical Western Diet (i.e., high in animal products, refined carbohydrates and processed food)
  • Able to communicate well in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vegan or Vegetarian
  • Presence of cognitive impairment at the time of recruitment into the study as measured by the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE, score 25-30) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR, score=0).
  • Pre-existing psychosis or psychiatric conditions
  • Currently receiving treatment for dementia
  • History of alcohol and/or substance abuse/dependence as determined by a positive endorsement on the MINI+/ If the MINI+ is positive for alcohol or drug dependence, or abuse, the participants will be excluded.
  • Heavy use of tobacco (greater than 1/2 pack per day)
  • History of cerebrovascular events
  • Existing allergies to berry fruits
  • Use of oral/IV antibiotics in the last 3 months. Use of probiotics in the last 1 month.
  • Recent Changes (last 3 months) in the use of psychoactive medications or other medications that interfere with the measured outcomes.
  • Frailty, malnutrition, or food allergy/intolerance requiring special diets.
  • Body weight at enrollment greater than 400lbs due to weight restrictions on the MRI table.
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or postpartum for less than 6months.
  • Women of childbearing age who are not practicing birth control or are planning to get pregnant during the study.

Unable to safely participate in the MRI (claustrophobia, presence of devices affected by MRI such as pacemakers, neurostimulators, metallic foreign body, etc.)

  • Chronic Pain
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Polyphenol Supplement

    Juice Plus Essentials, Berry Blend Capsules

    Dietary Supplement: Polyphenol Supplement

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Supplement

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo Supplement

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPolyphenol Supplement

    Dietary supplement taken twice daily for 12 months.

    Also known as: Juice Plus Essentials, Berry Blend Capsules

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo Supplement

    Dietary supplement taken twice daily for 12 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in Polyphenol-derived metabolite concentrations pre, mid, & post intervention - stool

    Measurement of metabolomics via stool specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times by the participant at home, once at baseline (week 0), once at mid-study (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  2. Differences in Polyphenol-derived metabolite concentrations pre, mid, & post intervention - blood

    Measurement of metabolomics via blood specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  3. Differences in microbiome levels pre, mid, & post intervention - Stool

    16S RNA sequencing to measure microbiome levels via stool specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times by the participant at home, once at baseline (week 0), once at mid-study (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  4. Differences in microbiome levels pre & post intervention - Blood

    16S RNA sequencing to measure microbiome levels via blood specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  5. Differences in microbiome levels pre, mid, & post intervention - Stool

    Shotgun metagenomics, sequencing to measure microbiome levels via stool specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times by the participant at home, once at baseline (week 0), once at mid-study (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  6. Differences in microbiome levels pre, mid, & post intervention - Blood

    Shotgun metagenomics, sequencing to measure microbiome levels via blood specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  7. Differences in Cognitive Measures pre, mid, & post intervention - Executive Function

    Administration of a standardized Stroop Neuro-psychological test; participants ability to correctly identify colors when words are printed in conflicting ink colors.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  8. Differences in Cognitive Measures pre, mid, & post intervention - Executive Function

    Administration of a standardized Trails A \& B; participants ability to connect dots, in order, as quickly as possible.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  9. Differences in Cognitive Measures pre, mid, & post intervention

    The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  10. Differences in Cognitive Measures pre, mid, and post intervention - Executive Functioning

    Administration of a standardized arithmetic task; participants ability to complete quick mental math.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in tryptophan-associated metabolite profiles pre, mid, and post intervention - Stool

    Measurement of tryptophan-associate metabolite profiles via stool specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  2. Differences in Bile Acid's (BA's) pre, mid, & post intervention - Stool

    Measurement of BA's via stool specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  3. Differences in Inflammatory markers pre, mid, & post intervention - Blood

    Measurement of inflammatory markers via blood specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  4. Differences in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) markers pre, mid, & post intervention - Blood

    Measurement of AD markers via blood specimen.

    Time frame: Collected three times, once at baseline appointment (week 0), once at mid-study appointment (month 6), and once at the final 12month appointment (month 12).

  5. Anthropometrics - BMI

    Measurement of height(in) and weight(lbs), used to calculate body mass index (BMI)

    Time frame: Measured three times, once at each in-clinic appointment (week 0, month 6, month 12)

  6. Questionnaire Data

    Use of validated surveys to assess ingestive behaviors, social isolation, stress, health, physical activity, etc., self-reported by the participant at home.

    Time frame: Collected 3 times (1) before beginning the dietary supplement, (2) mid-study month 6, (3) end of study month 12.

  7. Monthly Questionnaire Data

    Use of validated surveys to assess anxiety, depression, stress, and diet, self-reported by the participant at home,

    Time frame: Collected once a month for the duration of the study (12months).

  8. Anthropometrics - waist and hip circumference

    Measurement of waist and hip circumference (cm)

    Time frame: Measured three times, once at each in-clinic appointment (week 0, month 6, & month 12)

  9. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Measurement of the pressure of circulating blood at rest

    Time frame: Measured three times, once at each in-clinic appointment (week 0, month 6, month 12).

Other outcomes

  1. Differences in Multimodal Brain Signatures pre, mid, & post intervention

    Neuroimaging of participants brain via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure.

    Time frame: Measured thrice, once at baseline (week 0), mid-study (month 6), and final 12month appointment (month 12) visit.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06507254
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Responsible party
Arpana Church (Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
Start date
Jan 9, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Marika Dy, MPH
Contact
ChurchLab@mednet.ucla.edu
2670089
Arpana Church, PhD
principal investigator · The Regents of the University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion