ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03315832ARISTOTEUpdated Mar 17, 2023

Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Following aortIc Valve Intervention for Aortic STenOsis: a Randomized mulTi-cEntric Double-blind Phase II Study

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Valsartan and Placebo Oral Tablet in Aortic Valve Stenosis, Valsartan and Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Withdrawn at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-17.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
problem of faisability
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 130 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in France — 21 open to participants now, 33 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Aortic Valve Stenosis · France.

Enrollment
65th of 68
0 · median 179
Started
2023
with 5 others
Phase 2/3
Only one
of the 130
Registered
71st of 130
by date

Among the 130 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in France, this one is the 65th largest by enrollment of the 68 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2023, is the only one in phase 2/3, and was the 71st registered.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Open to participants now

21 of the 130 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in France are open now, in 12 countries. Each count lists the studies.

All 21 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 209 Aortic Valve Stenosis studies recruiting now, 163 (78%) set no upper age limit and 9 (4%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 130 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvular heart disease in Western countries, with increasing prevalence. Recent guidelines recommend aortic valve intervention (surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] or transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR]) in severe AS, as soon as symptoms or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction occur, in order to improve clinical outcome and achieve LV mass (LVM) regression. The highest amount of LVM regression is obtained during the first year. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in LV remodeling and residual LV hypertrophy is associated with poorer postoperative improvement in cardiac function and morphology. Incomplete regression of LV hypertrophy at 12 months after SAVR is a powerful predictor of adverse outcome. Yet, the use of specific pharmacological therapy to improve postoperative LVM regression could be an appealing therapeutic option after aortic valve intervention.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers (RAASb) and more particularly angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are efficient in reducing LVM in hypertensive patients, as emphasized by several meta-analyses. In addition, ARBs improve myocardial relaxation, diastolic function, decreased hypertrophy and may have anti-fibrotic effects. In a recent retrospective study from our group, RAASb prescription after SAVR was associated with increased survival, but confirmation through a randomized trial is mandatory. In a prospective randomized single-center study, the use of candesartan was associated both with LV and LA remodeling as compared to the conventional management. Nevertheless, these results are based on echocardiographic data, which is not the gold standard for the assessment cardiac remodeling, and no placebo or active comparator was tested to control the impact of ARBs in these patients.

The primary objective of this Phase II study is to investigate the efficacy of valsartan, introduced postoperatively, as compared to placebo, on 1-year changes in indexed LVM, as assessed by CMR, in patients undergoing aortic valve intervention (SAVR or TAVR) for AS.

The secondary objectives are to compare the efficacy of valsartan vs. placebo in terms of one-year changes (difference from baseline) in cardiac function and in cardiac morphology, one-year exercise capacity and one-year changes in biomarkers related to cardiac function. In addition, the assessment of the safety of valsartan will also be considered as secondary objective.

The ARISTOTE trial is a multicenter prospective phase II, randomized, double-blind study including patients with the diagnosis of severe AS and indication for valve intervention.

The active treatment is valsartan, an orally active, potent, and specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

Patients will be randomized between 2 groups (valsartan versus placebo) and the treatment will be initiated (80 mg daily) at 5±4 days following aortic valve intervention. The comparative treatment will be a placebo; tablets of valsartan and placebo have a similar appearance and administration mode. Patient in the control group will receive a placebo using the same protocol as the valsartan group.

The patients will be cautiously monitored and any adverse events will be collected. The dose will be increased at 160 mg daily 13±2 days after aortic valve intervention and, if well tolerated, for the remaining period of the study. The tolerance will be regularly assessed and dose adjusted according to a pre-specified algorithm.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Valsartan
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular

Keywords

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Valsartan
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • double-blind phase II study
  • left ventricular mass
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men with age ≥18 years
  • Women at state as defined by absence of menses for the last 12 months without alternative medical cause.
  • Severe AS, defined according most recent guidelines (aortic valve area \<1.0cm² or \<0.6cm²/m² and aortic mean pressure gradient ≥40mmHg or aortic maximal velocity >4m/s, as assessed using transthoracic echocardiography [TTE]).
  • Indication for aortic valve intervention
  • Affiliation to the French Social Security system
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients already under any Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System blockers (RAASb) prior to randomization.
  • Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft or other valvular intervention
  • Other significant left-sided valvular heart diseases (≥moderate), even without concomitant procedure
  • Any to CMR
  • Chronic kidney disease with estimated (GFR) \<30 ml/min
  • Prior or planned organ transplantation
  • Hyperkaliemia (kaliemia >5.5 mmol/L at inclusion visit)
  • Severe hepatic failure, biliary cirrhosis, cholestasis
  • Combined use of aliskiren and concomitant diabetes mellitus or renal failure with GFR\<60mL/min/1.73m²
  • Low systolic blood pressure (\<100mmHg)
  • History of angioedema
  • History of or allergy to Angiotensin-II Receptor Blockers or
  • Under legal authority.
  • Unwilling to consent

Secondary Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not under RAASb prior to randomization but who should benefit from this treatment to improve outcome:
  • Heart failure with reduced (\<40%)
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Clinical peripheral artery disease
  • History of cerebrovascular disease
  • Uncontrolled hypertension despite the use of other therapeutic classes
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Impossibility to perform randomization into the 9-day post-intervention period due to per procedural complication with prolonged stay in intensive cardiac care unit (including death).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Valsartan

    The active treatment is valsartan, an orally active, potent, and specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The treatment will be initiated (80 mg, daily) at 5±4 days following aortic valve intervention. The dose will be increased at 160 mg daily 13±2 days after aortic valve intervention and, if well tolerated, for the remaining period of the study.

    Drug: Valsartan

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Oral Tablet

    The comparative treatment will be a placebo; tablets of valsartan and placebo have a similar appearance and administration mode. Patient in the control group will receive a placebo using the same protocol as the valsartan group.

    Drug: Placebo Oral Tablet

Interventions

  • The active treatment is valsartan, an orally active, potent, and specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The treatment will be initiated (80 mg, daily) at 5±4 days following aortic valve intervention. The dose will be increased at 160 mg daily 13±2 days after aortic valve intervention and, if well tolerated, for the remaining period of the study.

  • DrugPlacebo Oral Tablet

    The comparative treatment will be a placebo; tablets of valsartan and placebo have a similar appearance and administration mode. Patient in the control group will receive a placebo using the same protocol as the valsartan group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Indexed left ventricular mass

    the 1-year change from baseline in indexed LVM after aortic valve intervention as assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain

    The 1-year change from baseline in left ventricular global longitudinal strain quantified using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  2. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain

    The 1-year change from baseline in Left ventricular global longitudinal strain quantified using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  3. Left atrial volume

    The 1-year change from baseline in Left atrial volume quantified using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  4. Left atrial volume

    The 1-year change from baseline in Left atrial volume quantified using TTE

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  5. Indexed left ventricular mass

    the 1-year change from baseline in indexed LVM after aortic valve intervention as assessed using TTE (real-time 3D)

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  6. Native T1

    the 1-year change from baseline in native T1 using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  7. Rate of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)

    the 1-year change from baseline in rate of LGE using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  8. Volume of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)

    the 1-year change from baseline in volume of LGE using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  9. Extra cellular volume

    The 1-year change from baseline in extra cellular volume using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  10. Indexed interstitial volume

    The 1-year change from baseline in Indexed interstitial volume using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  11. Electrocardiographic strain

    The 1-year change from baseline in Electrocardiographic strain

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  12. Left ventricular ejection fraction

    The 1-year change from baseline in Left ventricular ejection fraction using CMR

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  13. Left ventricular ejection fraction

    The 1-year change from baseline in Left ventricular ejection fraction using TTE

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  14. Peak exercise VO2

    The 1-year measurement of Peak exercise VO2

    Time frame: Year 1

  15. VE/VCO2 ratio

    The 1-year measurement of VE/VCO2 ratio

    Time frame: 1 year

  16. Maximal load

    The 1-year maximal load reached

    Time frame: 1 year

  17. New-York heart association functional class

    The 1-year assessment of New-York heart association functional class

    Time frame: 1 year

  18. Exercise oscillatory ventilation rate

    The 1-year quantification of exercise oscillatory ventilation rate

    Time frame: 1 year

  19. Nt-pro Brain natriuretic peptide

    The 1-year change from baseline in level of Nt-pro Brain natriuretic peptide using immunoassay

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  20. Plasma cardiac troponin I

    The 1-year change from baseline in concentration of Plasma cardiac troponin I using high-sensitivity assay

    Time frame: Day 0 to Year 1

  21. Incidence of treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Clinical occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) during the duration of the study period ending month 13

    Time frame: Day 1 to Month 13

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Limoges university hospital
    Limoges, 87042, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2023; primary completion for Jul 2025, 30 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2017
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
StartEst.
Jan 2, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 2, 2025
Last update
Mar 17, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03315832
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Jan 2, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 17, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Valsartan

Start the discussion