ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03582800ITS-PILOTUpdated Sep 15, 2026

Subcutaneous Injection of Sodium Thiosulfate for Ectopic Calcifications or Ossifications. A Pilot Study

A Phase 2 interventional study of STS in Systemic Sclerosis, Dermatomyositis and iPPSD2, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Recruiting at 11 sites in France. Open to participants aged 6 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2020; still recruiting 6 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
6 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ectopic soft tissue calcifications or ossifications can complicate the course of numerous diseases; most of them are rare or very rare. Even if the clinical, radiological and pathological presentation of ectopic calcifications and ossifications are different, the same hypotheses are discussed considering their hypothetical pathophysiology. Indeed, high calcium phosphate product, local cellular lesions and abnormal transdifferentiation of mesenchymal cells are regularly evoked when pathophysiology of such calcifications or ossifications are discussed. Apart from several case reports that have not been confirmed so far, no medical treatments are available, leading to significant pain and impairment of quality of life for patients. Therefore, only surgical treatment can be proposed when the volume or the consequences of these calcifications/ossifications become too important.

Sodium thiosulfate (STS) is currently used as a cyanide poisoning antagonist and a chemoprotectant against adverse effects of several chemotherapies such as Cisplatin. Numerous case reports and several studies have revealed the potential interest of STS in the treatment of uremic induced vascular or soft tissues calcifications. Recently, our group has developed an expertise in the use of STS for the treatment of ectopic soft tissue calcifications or ossifications. Considering these promising preliminary data, and their limits, we developed a strategy to treat soft tissue calcifications or ossifications based on a local administration of STS. The first results of this therapeutic strategy are highly promising and the local or systemic safety is satisfactory so far. These preliminary data also reported by others deserve to be confirmed in a prospective study.

We propose in this project to conduct a prospective open controlled phase II trial in order to assess the efficacy and the safety of intralesional administration of STS for the treatment of calcifications secondary to dermatomyositis or systemic sclerosis and ectopic ossifications secondary to pseudo-hypoparathyroidism 1a type (PHP1A/iPPSD2) (inactivating parathyroid hormone / parathyroid-hormone-related peptid (PTH/PTHrP) signalling disorder).

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Sclerosis
  • Dermatomyositis
  • iPPSD2

Keywords

  • Sodium thiosulfate
  • Ectopic calcification
  • Ectopic Ossification
03

In context

Scleroderma, Systemic

610 studies on the registry are indexed under Scleroderma, Systemic; 218 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 37 across 446 interventional studies indexed under Scleroderma, Systemic.

Browse Scleroderma, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 264 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient presenting with:

    • ectopic ossification secondary to iPPSD2 or
    • ectopic calcification secondary to dermatomyositis or
    • ectopic calcification secondary to systemic sclerosis
  • Patient aged 2 years or over
  • Indication of STS infusion validated by a multidisciplinary committee, based on the significant morbidity and/or functional impact of the targeted calcification/ossification
  • Patient with no planned surgery of the calcifications/ossifications for the twelve coming months
  • Women of on highly effective (such as hormonal contraception, intrauterine device, intrauterine hormone-releasing system, bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomised partner or sexual abstinence)
  • Men with women of childbearing potential partners should use condoms during the whole treatment period and until 91 days after the last injection.
  • signed by the patient / parents
  • Patient affiliated to the social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to STS or one of the used
  • to local injection of STS
  • Anticoagulant therapy
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient deprived of freedom by a court judgment or an administrative decision
  • Patient undergoing psychiatric care under coercion
  • Legally protected adult patients (guardianship / curatorship)
  • Patient unable to give consent
  • Patient placed under judicial protection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treated

    M0-M6: run-in phase (control) M6-M12: STS treatment phase

    Drug: STS

Interventions

  • DrugSTS

    M0-M6 (run-in phase): medical care and follow-up as usual M6-M12 (STS phase): * Patients with iPPSD2 will be treated with subcutaneous infusion using a portable pump. * Patients with dermatomyositis or systemic sclerosis will be treated with repeated injections every two weeks. Patients will receive a maximal total number of 11 STS injections. M12: final visit (V5): clinical evaluation, photograph and CT scan of the treated lesion, pain and quality of life evaluation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the percentage of volume of the treated calcifications / ossifications

    Calculation of percentage of volume evolution of the treated calcification / ossification between the beginning and the end of STS treatment, in each of the three diseases (dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis and iPPSD2), evaluated on CT-scan measurements.

    Time frame: between Month 6 and Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of the volume of the treated calcifications / ossifications

    Calculation of volume of the treated calcification / ossification at (i) inclusion, the end of the run-in period (6 month) and after 6 months of local injections of STS in each disease (12 month), evaluated on CT-scan measurements.

    Time frame: Month 0, Month 6 and Month 12

  2. Adverse events

    Collection of adverse events (clinical and biological): causality, severity, and seriousness during the STS treatment.

    Time frame: Month 12

  3. Change of the Hounsfield density of the treated ectopic calcifications/ossifications

    Hounsfield density analysis of the treated ectopic calcifications/ossifications at inclusion, the end of the run-in period (6 month) and after 6 months of local injections of STS (12 month), evaluated on CT-scan measurements.

    Time frame: Month 0, Month 6 and Month 12

  4. Change of the percentage of patient with a clinically pertinent variation in pain

    Calculation of Percentage of patients with a clinically pertinent variation in pain evaluated with pain scales: difference in hetero-evaluation scale of pain in children (HEDEN) ≥ 2 (2-7 years old) between M0-M6 and M6-M12

    Time frame: Between Month0 and Month 6 and Between Month 6 and Month 12

  5. Change of the percentage of patient with a clinically pertinent variation in pain

    Calculation of Percentage of patients with a clinically pertinent variation in pain evaluated with pain scales: difference in visual analogue pain intensity scale (VAS) score ≥ 2 (\> 7 years old) between M0-M6 and M6-M12

    Time frame: Between Month0 and Month 6 and Between Month 6 and Month 12

  6. Change of the percentage of patients with a clinically pertinent variation in quality of life

    Calculation of percentage of patients with a clinically pertinent variation in quality of life : difference in PedsQL ≥ 5 (2-18 years old, using appropriates reports) between M0-M6 and M6-M12

    Time frame: Between Month0 and Month 6 and Between Month 6 and Month 12

  7. Change of the percentage of patients with a clinically pertinent variation in quality of life

    Calculation of percentage of patients with a clinically pertinent variation in quality of life : difference in Short Form 36 (SF36) score ≥ 20 (\> 18 years old) between M0-M6 and M6-M12

    Time frame: Between Month0 and Month 6 and Between Month 6 and Month 12

07

Study locations

11 of 11 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2029, 113 months after the start.

Of 48 phase 2 interventional studies under Scleroderma, Systemic, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 83. This study's planned 113 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 13, 2018
First posted
Jul 11, 2018
StartActual
Jan 6, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jun 6, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 6, 2029
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03582800
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2018
Start date
Jan 6, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 6, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 6, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Vincent GUIGONIS, MD
Contact
vincent.guigonis@unilim.fr
555056358 ext. +33
Claire BAHANS
Contact
claire.bahans@chu-limoges.fr
Vincent GUIGONIS, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Limoges

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate

Start the discussion