CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03285685Updated Sep 18, 2017

Effect of Noninvasive Neuromodulation on Chronic Pain

A Phase 2 interventional study of active tDCS and active tDCS in Temporomandibular Dysfunction (TMD), sponsored by Federal University of Paraíba. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-18.

Sponsored by Federal University of Paraíba · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular Dysfunction (TMD) is a disease characterized by a set of signs and symptoms that may include joint noise, pain in the mastication muscles, limitation of mandibular movements, facial pain, joint pain and / or dental wear. Pain appears as a very present and striking symptom, with a tendency to chronicity. This is a difficult treatment condition often associated with psychological factors such as anxiety. Chronic pain involved modifications in the neuronal excitability, therefore, the neuromodulation withTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) appears as a possible strategy for the treatment. Some studies have shown improvement in subjects with chronic pain using tDCS, however, it needs further investigation of its therapeutic effect.
  2. PROBLEM: Despite the wide range of strategies used to treat patients with TMD, some patients have a temporary and / or unsatisfactory relief response, which generates hypotheses that emotional components often underlie treatment refractoriness, and development of a memory for pain. Thus, it is evident the need for a therapy that acts directly on the central nervous system (CNS). This action can occur through medications, however, many individuals are refractory or have side effects such as dependence and / or tolerance. In this way, the importance of new treatments involving neuromodulation and neuroplasticity mechanisms, such as tDCS, is highlighted, which may become a complementary alternative to the different types of treatment already in use. Besides corroborating with the need to give preference to reversible and non-invasive procedures.
  3. HYPOTHESIS: The investigators believe that the use of anodic tDCS in the treatment of patients with TMD presenting with chronic pain will have a positive effect, promoting a decrease in painful symptoms through a Central Nervous System (neuromodulation) action in comparison to placebo stimulation. Because of the mutual influence between pain and psychological factors, it is expected that the analgesic effect will have a positive effect on anxiety levels. In addition, it is believed that a more intense analgesic effect occurs in the DLPF stimulation group of the cortex compared to the M1 stimulation group, since this region demonstrates to be responsible for the processing of the emotional component of the pain, often underlying the refractoriness to treatment
  4. AIM: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of anodic tDCS, applied in different cortical regions (M1 and DLPFC), in the pain and anxiety levels in individuals with chronic pain due muscular TMD.
02

Conditions studied

  • Temporomandibular Dysfunction (TMD)

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Facial pain
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • Temporomandibular disorders
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18-60 years, both male and female
  • Provide informed consent to participate in the study;
  • Having a diagnosis of muscular pain DTM according to IA and IB, axis I RDC/TMD
  • Visual analogic scale (VAS) score from 4 to 10 for six months or longer
  • Presence of moderate depressive symptoms through SCL-90 scale evaluation of Axis II, (RDC / TMD)
  • Not pregnant;
  • Not have contraindications to tDCS, such as metal implants on the head or implanted brain devices;
  • Not have history of alcohol or drugs abuse within the past 6 months as self-reported
  • Not use of carbamazepine within the past 6 months as self reported
  • Not have any history of epilepsy, stroke, moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury or severe migraines
  • Not have history of neurosurgery as self-reported
  • Not have history of major psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
  • Not have any other previously diagnosed disorder with symptoms similar to the DTM, such as fibromyalgia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Two absences during treatment sessions;
  • During the research, go against some criteria of inclusion mentioned above, as in the case of women, getting pregnant.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    tDCS M1

    active tDCS Participants will receive active transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Device: active tDCS

  • Experimental
    tDCS DLPF

    active tDCS Participants will receive active transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Device: active tDCS

  • Sham comparator
    tDCS sham

    tDCS Sham Participants will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation.

    Device: sham tDCS

Interventions

  • Deviceactive tDCS

    Duration: 20 minutes; Intensity: 2 mA; Placement: anodal over left M1 and cathodal over supraorbital contralateral area

  • Deviceactive tDCS

    Duration: 20 minutes; Intensity: 2 mA; Placement: anodal over left DLPFC and cathodal over supraorbital contralateral area.

  • Devicesham tDCS

    The procedure is the same as for active tDCS anodal over left M1 and cathodal over supraorbital contralateral area, but the in the placebo tDCS the stimulation is non-active / sham.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Visual Analogic Scale

    The visual analogic scale allows us to convert subjective sensations as pain on numerical data. A 10cm scale where 0cm is no pain and 10cm the worse imaginable pain, will be used and the subjects will be asked to mark a point on the scale representing their pain. This instrument will be used to compare the VAS values before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGICS)

    The Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGICS) is an understandable, adequate, easy-to-use instrument capable of measuring the perception of change in health status and satisfaction with the treatment of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. It is a one-dimensional measurement instrument in which individuals rate their improvement associated with intervention on a 7-item scale ranging from 1 (no change) to 7 (Much better).

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

    The STAI is used to evaluate objectively both aspects of anxiety: trait and state. Thus, the anxiety state will assess the level of anxiety at the specific time the test is performed and the anxiety trait will investigate the individual's willingness to react to stress situations. It is an instrument with 40 descriptive statements about the feelings of the person, distributed in two parts (trace and state of anxiety), in which each part is formed by 20 affirmations and the answers are given in scale of the type Likert of four points (1 - absolutely not the 4 - very much). The score in each questionnaire ranges from 20 to 80, with an anxiety level rating of: low (20 to 33), mean (33 to 49) and high (49 to 80).

    Time frame: 4 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Tatyanne Falcão
    João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03285685
Lead sponsor
Federal University of Paraíba
Responsible party
Tatyanne dos Santos Falcão Silva (Tatyanne Falcão, Federal University of Paraíba) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2017
Start date
Oct 2, 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 26, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 16, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2017

Study contacts

Tatyanne Falcão
Contact
pesquisadtm@yahoo.com

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion