ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03282669Updated May 6, 2022

TC02 Obese Women Using It Morphine vs PCA IV Hydromorphone for Post-Cesarean Analgesia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intrathecal Morphine and Intravenous hydromorphone in Pain, Postoperative, Obesity and Respiratory Insufficiency, sponsored by Northwestern University. Withdrawn. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-06.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Change in institutional policy. Change in resources available.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cesarean deliveries are the most commonly performed surgery in the United States and account for 32.9% of all births.8,9 The ASA recommends the use of neuraxial opioids of post-cesarean analgesia partly because respiratory depression in the obstetric population, as measured by intermittent respiratory rate and pulse oximetry, is reported to be low (0-1.2%).10,11 Respiratory depression lacks a standard definition,12 but the most sensitive means of detecting respiratory depression is hypercapnia.1,3 Two recent studies using continuous hypercapnia (>50mmHg PaCO2) monitoring demonstrated higher rates of respiratory depression (17.8-37%) in healthy, non-obese women receiving intrathecal opioids for post-cesarean analgesia.13,14 In addition, supplemental opioids are required in the majority of women receiving intrathecal morphine and may increase the risk of respiratory depression.11,14 Anesthesiologists debate whether neuraxial opioids or intravenous patient controlled opioid analgesia (PCA) are the safest practice for postoperative analgesia in obese parturients following cesarean delivery. The ASA recommendations to employ neuraxial analgesia post-cesarean delivery does not differentiate between non-obese and obese women who now make up 30.3% in US women of child-bearing age.2 Obesity has been described as a risk factor for respiratory depression in those receiving opioids via any route of opioid administration,11,15, 17 but whether obesity itself is the risk factor or associated co-morbidities such as sleep apnea is debated.

Studies are conflicting whether intrathecal opioids or patient controlled intravenous opioids cause more respiratory depression. Several studies have documented the incidence of respiratory depression with IV PCA; the rates range from 0.19% to 5.2%, which are equivalent or higher than those reported for intrathecal opioids. (Hagle 16). Dalchow et al. demonstrated higher rates of hypercapnia in patients receiving intrathecal opioid compared with those receiving intravenous opioid via patient controlled analgesia in nonobese women following cesarean delivery. (Dalchow)

The Topological Oscillation Search with Kinematical Analysis (TOSCA) monitor allows a noninvasive method to measure transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels, with relative accuracy compared to arterial carbon dioxide monitoring.4-7 No studies have examined transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels in obese women following cesarean delivery using any form of postoperative analgesia. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial using continuous transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring to evaluate the degree of respiratory depression in obese women receiving neuraxial opioid compared to intravenous opioid via PCA for post-cesarean analgesia.

Two studies have demonstrated high rates of hypercapnia in non-obese women following administration of intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery in the postpartum period. (Dalchow, Bauchat) Dalchow et al. demonstrated higher rates of hypercapnia in women receiving intrathecal diamorphine than intravenous morphine delivered via patient controlled analgesia. It is unclear whether intrathecal morphine causes more or less respiratory depression than intravenous opioid delivered via patient-controlled analgesia in obese women.

This study will add to the understanding of respiratory function in the immediate postpartum period in obese women using opioids via intrathecal or intravenous routes. This study will better inform guidelines for the postpartum analgesic route of choice in the obese obstetric population and allow the investigators to make recommendations for the detection and prevention of respiratory depression after opioid administration in the obstetric population.

Objective is to examine the transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels in obese women using either intrathecal morphine or intravenous patient-controlled hydromorphone for post-cesarean analgesia.

The hypothesis is carbon dioxide levels will be significantly higher in obese women receiving intrathecal morphine versus obese women receiving intravenous patient controlled intravenous hydromorphone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Obesity
  • Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Monitoring
  • Pulse Oximetry
  • Cesarean Section
  • Postoperative pain control
  • High BMI
  • Hypercarbia
  • Hypoxemia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,423 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 105 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 78 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Term (≥37 week's gestation)
  • Healthy
  • 2-3
  • ≥40kg/m2 scheduled for elective cesarean section whose anesthetic plan is for neuraxial anesthesia (spinal or combined-spinal epidural technique)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with ASA >3,
  • \<40 kg/m2
  • Allergy to any of the medications used for pain control
  • to the spinal anesthetic technique
  • Known sleep apnea or other sleep disordered breathing
  • Regular use of other medications that cause respiratory depression (ie. benzodiazepines).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intrathecal Morphine

    Administration of 100µg intrathecal morphine to be given in the operative area.

    Drug: Intrathecal Morphine

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous Hydromorphone

    Administration of intravenous hydromorphone give IV pca in the post operative area.

    Drug: Intravenous hydromorphone

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of hypercapnia

    Incidence of hypercapnia (transcutaneous CO2 levels \>50mmHg) in the intrathecal morphine versus patient controlled intravenous morphine groups

    Time frame: 24 hours post delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid consumption

    Amount of opioids used during the time from delivery to 24 hours post delivery

    Time frame: 24 hours post delivery

  2. NSAID consumption

    Amount of NSAID's used during the time from delivery to 24 hours post delivery.

    Time frame: 24 hours post delivery

  3. Respiratory rate

    Hourly respiratory rates for the first 12 hours then every 2 hours for the next 12 hours.

    Time frame: 24 hours post delivery

  4. Sedation scores

    Sedation scores as scored on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale at 2 hours, 6 hour and 12 hours post delivery.

    Time frame: delivery to 12 hours post delivery

  5. Pain Scores

    Pain scores on a scale of 0 (low)-10 (high) will be documented every hour for the first 24 hours after delivery.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Pulse oximetry

    Pulse oximetry will be collected using the transcutaneous Co2 monitor for 24 hours after deliuvery.

    Time frame: 24 hours post delivery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee LA, Caplan RA, Stephens LS, Posner KL, Terman GW, Voepel-Lewis T, Domino KB. Postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2015 Mar;122(3):659-65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000564. PubMed 25536092 ↗
  • Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732. PubMed 24570244 ↗
  • Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Respiratory Depression Associated with Neuraxial Opioid Administration: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Anesthesiology. 2016 Mar;124(3):535-52. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000975. No abstract available. PubMed 26655725 ↗
  • McCormack JG, Kelly KP, Wedgwood J, Lyon R. The effects of different analgesic regimens on transcutaneous CO2 after major surgery. Anaesthesia. 2008 Aug;63(8):814-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05487.x. PubMed 18699897 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Aug 2019; primary completion for Dec 2021, 28 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 12, 2017
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
StartEst.
Aug 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2021
CompletionEst.
Dec 2021
Last update
May 6, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03282669
Responsible party
Feyce M. Peralta, MD, MS (Principal Investigator, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Aug 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2022

Study contacts

Feyce Peralta, MD
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Morphine · Hydromorphone

Start the discussion