An interventional study of Laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis in Perforated Appendicitis, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-30.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
A laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was first reported by Semm in 1983. Since then, its advantages, such as the aesthetic appearance of the wound, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery which facilitates early discharge, have been highlighted, and the number of procedures performed has been continuously increasing.
The LA was performed mostly on uncomplicated appendicitis due to negative opinions about its safety when it was first introduced. However, the application of the procedure has been extended to complicated appendicitis (CA), and it is now considered as an alternative procedure to an open appendectomy (OA) as its safety record has improved . Nevertheless, it is still controversial because there are still concerns about surgical difficulties in managing CA with laparoscopy, overall surgery time, possible post-op complications and conversion to an OA during the surgery.
this study aimed to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of LA for managing perforated appendicitis.
419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.
Browse Appendicitis studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Other: Laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis
1. Insertion of Ports 2. Exposure of the Appendix 3. peritoneal toilet and aspiration of pus after abdominal exposure 4. Isolation of Mesoappendicular Artery 5. Clipping and Dividing of the Artery 6. Application of 3 x Endoloops 7. Division of the Appendix 8. Retrieval of the Appendix in an Endobag
early recovery
recovery within 2 days
Time frame: 2 day
wound cosmetic appearance
no scare of incision post laporscopic mangement
Time frame: 6 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
Start is estimated for Sep 2017; primary completion for Mar 2019, 18 months later.
Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Appendicitis, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 18 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 91 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.