ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07869095ALPACA-MCUpdated Oct 9, 2026

Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole for Children With Perforated Appendicitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole in Appendicitis Perforated, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic and Antibiotic, sponsored by McMaster Children's Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 0 Weeks to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by McMaster Children's Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Weeks to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ALPACA-MC trial is a blinded, multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing two postoperative antibiotic treatments for children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Perforated appendicitis occurs when the appendix has developed a hole or has burst.

The study will include 180 children from several pediatric hospitals. After surgery, participants will be randomly assigned to receive either piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) or ceftriaxone plus metronidazole (CM). The child, family, healthcare team, and researchers assessing the outcomes will not know which treatment was received.

The main purpose of the study is to determine whether PT reduces hospital length of stay compared with CM. The study will also compare other important outcomes, including surgical site infections, the need for additional imaging or procedures, emergency department visits, and hospital readmissions.

Children will be followed for 30 days after surgery. At 30 days, families will be contacted to ask about any additional complications and how well the child has recovered. This will include questions about returning to school, sports or other physical activities, and the child's overall health and quality of life.

The results of this study will help determine which antibiotic treatment is most appropriate for children with perforated appendicitis and may help guide future clinical practice and antibiotic stewardship.

02

Conditions studied

  • Appendicitis Perforated
  • Appendectomy, Laparoscopic
  • Antibiotic
  • Pediatric
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Piperacillin
  • Tazobactam
  • Ceftriaxone
  • Metronidazole
03

In context

Appendicitis

417 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 111 across 248 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Weeks to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy
  • Perforated appendicitis confirmed intra-operatively (i.e., visible hole in appendix, fecalith found in peritoneal cavity, intra-abdominal abscess, and/or purulent fluid in peritoneal cavity)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-operative treatment (e.g., due to abscess)
  • Interval laparoscopic appendectomy
  • Conversion to open procedure
  • Non-perforated appendicitis
  • Confirmed or suspected allergy to penicillins or cephalosporins
  • Renal impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Piperacillin/tazobactam

    Drug: Piperacillin/Tazobactam

  • Active comparator
    Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole

    Drug: Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole

Interventions

  • DrugPiperacillin/Tazobactam

    Piperacillin/tazobactam 100 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 4.5 g IV q8h) and normal saline once daily.

  • DrugCeftriaxone + Metronidazole

    Drug pages: Ceftriaxone · Metronidazole

    Ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg IV once daily (to a maximum of 2 g IV daily) and metronidazole 10 mg/kg IV q8h (to a maximum of 500 mg IV q8h).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Length of stay in hospital during index admission.

    Time frame: Measured as the number of days from index hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with deep or organ-space surgical site infection

    Number of participants who develop a deep incisional or organ-space surgical site infection following the index appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  2. Number of participants requiring post-operative ultrasound

    Number of participants who undergo at least one abdominal ultrasound following the index appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  3. Number of participants undergoing percutaneous drain insertion

    Number of participants who undergo percutaneous drain insertion by Interventional Radiology following the index appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  4. Number of participants undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion

    Number of participants who undergo insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) following the index appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  5. Number of participants receiving parenteral nutrition

    Number of participants who receive parenteral nutrition following the index appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  6. Number of participants with Clostridioides difficile infection

    Number of participants who develop laboratory-confirmed Clostridioides difficile infection requiring treatment following the index appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  7. Number of participants returning to the emergency department

    Number of participants who return to an emergency department following discharge from the index hospitalization for appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

  8. Number of participants readmitted to hospital

    Number of participants who require hospital readmission following discharge from the index hospitalization for appendectomy.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

Other outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life: disease-specific

    Time to return to school and unrestricted physical activity, reflecting recovery domains addressed in core outcome sets for pediatric appendicitis.

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery.

  2. Health-related quality of life: generic

    Assessed using the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) instrument.

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Briatico D, Safa N, Flageole H, Khan S, Pernica J, Eltorki M, Cohen E, Livingston MH. Assessing the Longitudinal outcomes of Piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftriAxone and metronidazole for Children with perforated Appendicitis (ALPACA): A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2025 Nov 7;20(11):e0335991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335991. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41202087 ↗
  • Armstrong J, Sriranjan J, Briatico D, Khan S, Eltorki M, Livingston MH. Piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftriaxone/metronidazole for children with perforated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Nov 4;42(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06227-z. PubMed 41186640 ↗
  • Zeineddin S, Pitt JB, Linton S, De Boer C, Hu A, Carter M, Alayleh A, Abdullah F, Raval M, Goldstein SD. Postoperative Antibiotics for Complicated Appendicitis in Children: Piperacillin/Tazobactam Versus Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole. J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Jun;58(6):1128-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Feb 17. PubMed 36931937 ↗
  • Cramm SL, Graham DA, Feng C, Allukian M, Blakely ML, Chandler NM, Cowles RA, Kunisaki SM, Lipskar AM, Russell RT, Santore MT, Campbell BT, Commander SJ, DeFazio JR, Dukleska K, Echols JC, Esparaz JR, Gerall C, Griggs CL, Hanna DN, He K, Keane OA, McLean SE, Pace E, Scholz S, Sferra SR, Tracy ET, Zhang L, Rangel SJ; Eastern Pediatric Surgery Network. Use of Antipseudomonal Antibiotics is Not Associated With Lower Rates of Postoperative Drainage Procedures or More Favorable Culture Profiles in Children With Complicated Appendicitis: Results From a Multicenter Regional Research Consortium. Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 1;279(6):1070-1076. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006152. Epub 2023 Nov 16. PubMed 37970676 ↗
  • Kashtan MA, Graham DA, Melvin P, Hills-Dunlap JL, Anandalwar SP, Rangel SJ. Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the management of complicated appendicitis in children: Results from a multicenter pediatric NSQIP analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Oct;57(10):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 20. PubMed 34876294 ↗
  • Lee J, Garvey EM, Bundrant N, Hargis-Villanueva A, Kang P, Osuchukwu O, Dekonenko C, Svetanoff WJ, St Peter SD, Padilla B, Ostlie D. IMPPACT (Intravenous Monotherapy for Postoperative Perforated Appendicitis in Children Trial): Randomized Clinical Trial of Monotherapy Versus Multi-drug Antibiotic Therapy. Ann Surg. 2021 Sep 1;274(3):406-410. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005006. PubMed 34132703 ↗
  • Linnaus ME, Ostlie DJ. Complications in common general pediatric surgery procedures. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;25(6):404-411. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 29. PubMed 27989365 ↗
  • St Peter SD, Snyder CL. Operative management of appendicitis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Aug;25(4):208-11. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 10. PubMed 27521710 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Apr 2027; primary completion for Dec 2031, 56 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2026
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
StartEst.
Apr 2027
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2031
CompletionEst.
Dec 2031
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07869095
Lead sponsor
McMaster Children's Hospital
Collaborators
Alberta Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Center, Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC, The Hospital for Sick Children
Responsible party
Michael Livingston (Associate Professor of Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Livingston, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Contact
livingm@mcmaster.ca
905-521-2100 ext. 75231

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion