ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02886286Updated Mar 24, 2022Results posted

Patient Controlled Intrathecal Analgesia With Bupivacaine for Chronic Low Back Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Bupivacaine and Opioid in Pain, Intractable, Breakthrough Pain and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 31 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-24.

Sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
31 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the local anesthetic bupivacaine delivered intrathecally in small doses via PTM self-administered boluses significantly improves the breakthrough pain and functional status of patients with chronic intractable pain who are managed with an intrathecal drug delivery system.

Read the detailed description

Methodology /Technical Approach:

Seventeen patients who are already using SynchroMed II pump containing an admixture of bupivacaine and an opioid and using PTM doses will receive Solution A during the first week of the study and will be crossed over to Solution B during the second week of the study. Solution A and Solution B would consist of either the patient's usual intrathecal opioid with bupivacaine at the same concentrations or the usual patient's intrathecal opioid at the same concentration but without bupivacaine. Only the Investigational Pharmacy at University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC) would be aware of the contents of Solution A and Solution B. Patients and study personnel in the Pain Medicine Division would be blinded to the solution content. The sequence of pump refills will be as follows:

  • Week I: Patients will have the intrathecal pumps refilled with 10 milliliters of a Solution A or B, after removal of residual volume of baseline solution.
  • Week II: IT pump will be filled with 10 ml of Solution A or B (whichever solution subject did not receive Week 1), after removal of residual volume from Week I.

Both patients and the evaluating physician will be blinded. In order to accomplish this, only the central compounding (investigational) pharmacy at UHCMC would make two solutions labeled: A or B respectively. Study subjects will be randomized and randomization order will be held at the pharmacy that will supply the medication. Patients will be kept on each solution for one week. Data will be collected daily

Primary outcome measures will include 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both immediately before and within 30 minutes after a PTM bolus. Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Only 5 recording per day on days 3-7 and 10-14 will be available on the diary-thus patients would record pain scores only before and after the first 5 PTM boluses. Only the scores before and after the first 3 successful PTM boluses would be considered. Successful PTM activations would be determined by review of the patient PTM diary and the internal log from the intrathecal drug delivery system. Each recording on the PTM diary would be time matched to the successful PTM activation code in the internal log. This will obviate any potential mis-administered bolus whereby the patient does not activate the bolus device appropriately. Secondary outcome measures will include average NRS pain scores for the week, functional capacity as evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, Global Impression of Change and painDETECT. Other relevant data such as number of boluses used and paresthetic sensation post bolus (if felt)/patient guess of blinding arm would be recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Intractable
  • Breakthrough Pain
  • Chronic Pain
03

In context

Pain, Intractable

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Intractable; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 60 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Intractable.

Browse Pain, Intractable studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
31 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age more than 30 years implanted with an intrathecal drug delivery device.
  • Intrathecal pump patients on stable dose for the last 3 months.
  • Using on average more than 2 and less than 10 PTM doses per day
  • Intrathecal medication admixture consisting of bupivacaine and another opioid (fentanyl or hydromorphone or morphine)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Using 10 or more PTM bolus doses per day or 2 or less PTM bolus doses per day
  • Pending litigation or worker compensation claim
  • Any recent (less than 3 month) procedures in spine (surgeries) or catheter adjustments.
  • Recent pump dose adjustment within the past 3 months
  • Pumps with medications other than bupivacaine/opioid combination.
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bupivacaine + Opioid

    Intrathecal solution has bupivacaine with an opioid (hydromorphone, fentanyl or morphine). Patients will administer PTM bolus of bupivacaine with opioid. The bolus will be administered over 2 minutes and will have a variable frequency depending on patient's need but the number of boluses should be \>2 and \<10. The bupivacaine dosage would range between 0.4 and 1.5 mg per bolus. The opioid dose will vary depending on the concentration of the opioid in the solution.

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Opioid

  • Active comparator
    Opioid

    Intrathecal solution has only an opioid (hydromorphone, fentanyl or morphine) and no bupivacaine. Patients will administer PTM bolus of opioid without bupivacaine. This opioid bolus dose would be the same as they would have received prior to enrolling in the study (with bupivacaine). The bolus will be administered over 2 minutes and will have a variable frequency depending on patient's need but the number of boluses should be \>2 and \<10.

    Drug: Opioid

Interventions

  • Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain

  • DrugOpioid

    Patient-activated intrathecal bolus for incident pain

    Also known as: Fentanyl, Hydromorphone, Morphine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)

    Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolus

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): calculated as a percentage based on scores from 0-5 in 10 categories (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, travelling). 0 signifies no pain interference while 5 signifies maximum possible pain interference in the 10 categories. Scores from 0-5 for 10 categories are added and divided by total possible score (50) X 100 to give percentage. Interpretation of percentage scores: 0 - 20% minimal disability 21-40% moderate disability 41-60% severe disability 61-80% crippled 81-100% either bed bound or patient is exaggerating symptoms

    Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

  2. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): reflects patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment 1. = very much improved 2. = much improved 3. = minimally improved 4. = no change 5. = worse 6. = much worse 7. = very much worse

    Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

  3. Change From Baseline in painDETECT

    painDETECT is a nine-item questionnaire that consists of seven sensory symptom items for pain that are graded from 0= never to 5= strongly, one temporal item on pain-course pattern graded -1 to +1, and one spatial item on pain radiation graded 0 for no radiation or +2 for radiating pain. A total score that ranges from -1 to 38 can be calculated from the nine items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.

    Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

  4. Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)

    Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS) over the past week Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

  5. Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction

    A 5-point qualitative Likert scale was used to report measures of patient satisfaction (i.e., not satisfied at all, not satisfied, somewhat, satisfied, very satisfied). To quantify satisfaction, these responses were transformed to a scale of 0-4, with higher numbers representing greater levels of satisfaction.

    Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBupivacaine + Opioid First, Then OpioidOpioid First, Then Bupivacaine + Opioid
Started89
Completed88
Not completed01
Withdrew: Pump motor stall01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)

Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus. Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Time frame:
Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolus
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)
units on a scaleBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)1.87 ± 1.41.81 ± 1.47
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): calculated as a percentage based on scores from 0-5 in 10 categories (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, travelling). 0 signifies no pain interference while 5 signifies maximum possible pain interference in the 10 categories. Scores from 0-5 for 10 categories are added and divided by total possible score (50) X 100 to give percentage. Interpretation of percentage scores: 0 - 20% minimal disability 21-40% moderate disability 41-60% severe disability 61-80% crippled 81-100% either bed bound or patient is exaggerating symptoms

Time frame:
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
units on a scaleBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).88 ± 9.42.67 ± 9.02
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): reflects patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment 1. = very much improved 2. = much improved 3. = minimally improved 4. = no change 5. = worse 6. = much worse 7. = very much worse

Time frame:
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
units on a scaleBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)-0.06 ± 2.111.25 ± 1.81
SecondaryChange From Baseline in painDETECT

painDETECT is a nine-item questionnaire that consists of seven sensory symptom items for pain that are graded from 0= never to 5= strongly, one temporal item on pain-course pattern graded -1 to +1, and one spatial item on pain radiation graded 0 for no radiation or +2 for radiating pain. A total score that ranges from -1 to 38 can be calculated from the nine items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.

Time frame:
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in painDETECT
units on a scaleBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
Change From Baseline in painDETECT0.69 ± 2.960.25 ± 4.75
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)

Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS) over the past week Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain

Time frame:
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)
units on a scaleBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)-0.47 ± 1.59-0.38 ± 1.69
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction

A 5-point qualitative Likert scale was used to report measures of patient satisfaction (i.e., not satisfied at all, not satisfied, somewhat, satisfied, very satisfied). To quantify satisfaction, these responses were transformed to a scale of 0-4, with higher numbers representing greater levels of satisfaction.

Time frame:
Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction
units on a scaleBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction2.36 ± 1.221.94 ± 1.18

Adverse events

Collected over 2 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bupivacaine + Opioid0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)3/16 (18.8%)
Opioid0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)3/16 (18.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBupivacaine + OpioidOpioid
headacheNervous system disorders3/161/16
numbness/tinglingNervous system disorders1/162/16
nauseaNervous system disorders2/161/16
fatigueGeneral disorders0/161/16
anxietyPsychiatric disorders0/161/16
skin irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/161/16
urinary hesitancyRenal and urinary disorders0/161/16

Baseline characteristics

Participants who finished study.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Bupivacaine + OpioidOpioidTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years448
>=65 years448
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Bupivacaine + OpioidOpioidTotal
Mean63.125 ± 8.9663.75 ± 10.863.43 ± 9.93
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Bupivacaine + OpioidOpioidTotal
Female5611
Male325
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Bupivacaine + OpioidOpioidTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White7815
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Bupivacaine + OpioidOpioidTotal
United States8816
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2016, a primary completion of Dec 2017 and a completion of Dec 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2022, 4 years 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2016
First posted
Sep 1, 2016
Start
May 2016
Primary completionActual
Dec 2017
CompletionActual
Dec 2017
Results first posted
Mar 24, 2022
Last update
Mar 24, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02886286
Responsible party
Salim M Hayek (MD, PhD, Chief, Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2016
Start date
May 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Results posted
Mar 24, 2022
Last update
Mar 24, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion