ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07876102SMART-Y pilotUpdated Oct 15, 2026

Self-management for Youth With Epilepsy Pilot

An interventional study of SMART-Y in Epilepsy, sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 15, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pilot feasibility and acceptability trial of the SMART-Y intervention in a small group of adolescents (n=18), age 14-17

Read the detailed description

Pilot feasibility and acceptability trial of the SMART-Y intervention, which was modified from an evidence-based adult self-management program called Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART). SMART is a remotely delivered/ real-time, group-format epilepsy self-management intervention that targets those who have had recent epilepsy-related complications and emphasizes management of lifestyle and emotions, as well as seizure control.

The study also enrolls peer educators who assist with intervention delivery. Demographic information will be collected from peer educators; however, peer educators do not receive the intervention as study recipients and are not included in analyses of participant outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Epilepsy
  • Self-Management
  • Adolescents
  • SMART
  • Feasibility and Acceptability
  • Pilot
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,842 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 423 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 50 across 1,228 interventional studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 14-17
  • Diagnosed with epilepsy, per clinician or chart diagnosis
  • Has parent/guardian that is able/willing to consent (parent does not have to also participate, just has to consent to the youth's participation)
  • Speaks English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbid Dx: moderate-severe intellectual disability
  • Unable to assent to the study
  • Unable to meaningfully participate in the intervention sessions or assessments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: [SMART-Y]

    Behavioral: SMART-Y

Interventions

  • BehavioralSMART-Y

    SMART-Y is a youth-focused adaptation of SMART ( Self-MAnagement for people with epilepsy and a histoRy of negative health evenTs) developed for adolescents transitioning into adulthood. SMART is a remotely delivered, real-time group intervention that supports epilepsy self-management among individuals with recent epilepsy-related complications. The program emphasizes seizure control, lifestyle management, and emotional health.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility 1 - Session Attendance Rate

    Percentage of scheduled intervention sessions attended during the 12-week intervention period. Each participant will be scheduled to attend 8 weekly intervention sessions; therefore, the total number of scheduled sessions will be calculated as the number of participants enrolled multiplied by 8 sessions.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Feasibility 2 - Intervention Sessions Retention

    Proportion of participants who attended 75% of the sessions. Retention to sessions will be calculated as the number of participants attending at least 6 of the 8 scheduled intervention sessions divided by the total number of participants enrolled.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Feasibility 3 - Assessment Retention

    Percentage of participants who complete both the baseline and 12-week assessments. Assessment retention will be calculated as the number of participants completing both assessments divided by the number of participants enrolled.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 30-Day Seizure Count

    The 30-day seizure count is a standalone frequency metric determined by the total number of distinct clinical seizure events reported by the participant over a 30-day recall period. The score ranges from 0 to no upper limit, where a higher score indicates a worse clinical outcome (more frequent seizures).

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

  2. Change in Negative Health Events (NHE) Total Score

    The Negative Health Events (NHE) total score is calculated as the sum of the total number of distinct events occurring over a 6-month recall period across 5 categories: seizures, emergency department visits, inpatient hospital admissions, self-harm attempts, and accidents or traumatic injuries. The total score ranges from 0 to no upper limit, where a higher score indicates a worse clinical outcome (more frequent negative health events).

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

  3. Change in PedsQL Epilepsy Module Standard Version Total Score

    The PedsQL Epilepsy Module Standard Version Total Scale Score is a 29-item questionnaire assessing epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) across five domains (Impact, Cognitive, Sleep, Executive Functioning, and Mood/Behavior) with a standard 1-month recall period. Raw 5-point Likert scale items are reverse-scored and linearly transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale. The Total Scale Score represents the mean of all answered items. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better epilepsy-specific HRQOL.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

  4. Change in PedsQL Epilepsy Module Acute Version Total Score

    The PedsQL Epilepsy Module Acute Version Total Scale Score is a 29-item questionnaire assessing epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) across five domains (Impact, Cognitive, Sleep, Executive Functioning, and Mood/Behavior) with an acute 7-day recall period. Raw 5-point Likert scale items are reverse-scored and linearly transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale. The Total Scale Score represents the mean of all answered items. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better acute, epilepsy-specific HRQOL.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sajatovic M, Tatsuoka C, Welter E, Perzynski AT, Colon-Zimmermann K, Van Doren JR, Bukach A, Lawless ME, Ryan ER, Sturniolo K, Lhatoo S. Targeted Self-Management of Epilepsy and Mental Illness for individuals with epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidity. Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Oct 12. PubMed 27743547 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Jobst BC, Shegog R, Bamps YA, Begley CE, Fraser RT, Johnson EK, Pandey DK, Quarells RC, Scal P, Spruill TM, Thompson NJ, Kobau R. The Managing Epilepsy Well Network:: Advancing Epilepsy Self-Management. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3 Suppl 3):S241-S245. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.026. PubMed 28215372 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Colon-Zimmermann K, Kahriman M, Fuentes-Casiano E, Liu H, Tatsuoka C, Cassidy KA, Lhatoo S, Einstadter D, Chen P. A 6-month prospective randomized controlled trial of remotely delivered group format epilepsy self-management versus waitlist control for high-risk people with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2018 Sep;59(9):1684-1695. doi: 10.1111/epi.14527. Epub 2018 Aug 10. PubMed 30098003 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is an internal pilot study.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07876102
Responsible party
Molly McVoy (Physician, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Jessica O Surdam, MPH
Contact
Jessica.Surdam@UHhospitals.org
216-844-7925
Carla M Conroy, MPH
Contact
Carla.Conroy@UHhospitals.org
216-844-2871
Molly K McVoy, MD
principal investigator · University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion