ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06596681Updated Jul 31, 2026

A Study of the Safety and Tolerability of GA in the Treatment of Patients With Refractory Neuropathic Pain

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of GA+clozapine in Pain, Intractable, sponsored by Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-31.

Sponsored by Beijing Tiantan Hospital · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Previous studies have shown that the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in the regulation of pain and its associated negative emotions, that pyramidal neurons are highly excitable in chronic neuropathic pain conditions, and that silencing of pyramidal neurons can eliminate pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracranial injection of GA (containing the hM4Di gene) in the anterior cingulate cortex in combination with oral clozapine for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain.

Read the detailed description

There is no effective treatment for refractory neuropathic pain, and this study aims to develop new treatments. Previous studies have shown that the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in the regulation of pain and its associated negative emotions, that pyramidal neurons are highly excitable in chronic neuropathic pain conditions, and that silencing of pyramidal neurons can eliminate pain. Animal studies have shown that inhibition of anterior cingulate cortex neurons using chemical genetics can effectively eliminate pain responses. Our team has obtained similar therapeutic effects with chemical genetics in mouse models of central pain, bone cancer pain, migraine, and nerve injury. In this study, a chemogenetic approach was used to express designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drug (hM4Di) in the anterior cingulate cortex, which binds to clozapine to inhibit neuronal excitability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracranial injection of GA (containing the hM4Di gene) in the anterior cingulate cortex in combination with oral clozapine for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Intractable

Keywords

  • Refractory neuropathic pain
  • GA
  • clozapine
  • safety
03

In context

Pain, Intractable

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Intractable; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 6 is below the median of 60 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Intractable.

Browse Pain, Intractable studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tiantan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 489 studies on the registry; 293 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with a definitive diagnosis of neuropathic pain, including but not limited to painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, and post-stroke pain, aged 18-65 years old (regardless of gender), with:

    1. Regularised treatment with conventional medical therapy (including, but not limited to, medication, physiotherapy, cognitive therapy, nerve blocks and other non-invasive or minimally invasive treatments) for at least 3 months with no symptomatic relief or emergence of tolerance, as assessed by the investigator
    2. Pharmacological treatment means a full course of treatment with at least two medications, as assessed by the investigator
  2. Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) value ≥4 cm and/or mean numerical rating scale (NRS) value ≥4 points within one week of baseline at enrolment
  3. Subjects who have had a stable analgesic regimen for at least 30 days prior to the intensity of pain described in Inclusion Criterion 2 and agree not to arbitrarily change the type and dose of medication that they are currently taking until the end of the period of assessment of the effectiveness of this trial, as assessed by the investigator
  4. Subjects volunteered to participate in the trial and gave fully to sign an informed consent form
  5. Have stable neurological status as assessed by the researcher through motor, sensory and reflex functions
  6. Subjects are considered reliable and able to comply with the trial protocol (e.g., able to understand and complete relevant scales), visit protocols, and medication administration, according to the investigator's judgement
  7. Subjects of agree to sign an informed consent form and have no plans to have children during the study period and voluntarily use effective (oral contraceptives are prohibited) and do not plan to donate sperm or eggs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.In patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, amputation due to diabetes mellitus or large (≥3cm) and/or gangrenous ulcers on the lower limbs 2.Currently diagnosed with progressive neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, tumours of the brain or spinal cord, and neurodegenerative disorders, as determined by the investigators 3.Have a chronic systemic disease that, as assessed by the investigator, may affect the subject's participation in the study, including but not limited to:

    1. suffering from severe cardiopulmonary disease such as unstable angina, myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmia, recurrent asthma attacks, etc;
    2. Malignant tumours of the central nervous system or other systems. 4.Current status such as coagulation disorders, bleeding tendencies, dysfunction, severely reduced function due to underlying cardiac/pulmonary disease, progressive peripheral vascular disease, or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, and subjects who may be suffering from a relevant disease state that affects surgery as assessed by the investigator 5.Currently on anticoagulants and unable to stop them 6.Localised infection or active systemic infection at the anticipated surgical access site 7.History of previous intracranial surgical treatment (except for minimally invasive paracentesis for diagnostic tests, etc.) 8.Patients with severe psychiatric symptoms (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia, etc.) or significant suicidal tendencies or assessed by the investigator to be unable to complete the clinical trial 9. Pre-existing or concomitant severe hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, cardiac dysfunction (in which severe hepatic dysfunction is defined as ≥ 2.0 times the or AST ≥ 2.0 times the upper limit of normal; severe renal dysfunction refers to a CRE ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal or an \< 40mL/min/1.73m2; and severe cardiac dysfunction refers to an score of grade 3-4) ,delirium, hypotension, epilepsy, glaucoma, myelosuppression or leukopenia, severe central nervous system depression, or coma from any cause 10. Subjects with abnormal laboratory test values:

    <!-- -->

    1. white blood cell count \<3.5 x 109/L and \<1.0 x 109/L
    2. Platelet (PLT) \<75 x 109/L
    3. Coagulation: and activated partial thromboplastin time >1.5 x ULN
    4. Blood adeno-associated virus (AAV) antibody titre >1:1000 11.Patients taking drugs that cause granulocyte deficiency or have myelosuppressive effects 12.Patients with granulocyte deficiency or severe granulocytopenia due to prior clozapine use 13.Patients with and/or allergies to medications during the trial (e.g. clozapine or other components of clozapine, contrast agents, etc.) 14.Have gastrointestinal diseases (Crohn's disease, acute or chronic pancreatitis, paralytic intestinal obstruction, etc.) or major gastrointestinal surgeries that affect the absorption, metabolism and excretion of drugs, etc.

      15.Subjects had received any gene or cellular therapy 16. Known history of alcohol, drug abuse 17.Patients participating in other clinical trials or applying other biologics, drugs or devices within six months prior to screening 18.Contraindications to MRI and functional MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, metallic foreign bodies in the body) 19.Clozapine-related serious adverse reactions are considered a screening failure if they occur during the screening period, at the judgement of the investigator

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GA intracranial injection combined with oral clozapine

    Patients were first given intracranial injections of GA , followed by the oral clozapine.

    Genetic: GA+clozapine

Interventions

  • GeneticGA+clozapine

    Patients were first given intracranial injections of GA and observed for 14-28 days, followed by a dose-climbing trial of clozapine medication, and finally, after the investigators had determined an effective dose of clozapine, the patients were given a fixed dose of clozapine orally for three months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence and severity of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse events (SAE) as assessed by CTCAE v5.0

    Patient-Reported Adverse Events, Abnormalities on Physical Examination, and Abnormalities in Laboratory Tests

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. effectiveness: the degree of pain improvement was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS).

    The degree of pain improvement was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS Score: i.e. Pain Scale Rating, which assesses the severity of pain using visual analogue methods. The scale uses a 10cm long straight line with '0' cm and '10' cm at each end, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating unbearable severe pain.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  2. effectiveness: the pain improvement was assessed by Brief pain inventory (BPI) scale.

    the pain improvement was assessed by Brief pain inventory (BPI) scale. BPI: Evaluates pain severity and functional interference. Part 1 (Severity): Current pain, average pain (24h), worst pain (24h), least pain (24h), pain relief from treatments. Part 2 (Interference): Impact on general activity, mood, walking ability, work, relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  3. effectiveness: the degree of sleep quality improvement was assessed by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).

    The degree of sleep quality improvement was assessed by Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). ISI scale: 7 entries, each rated 0-4. The total score ranges from 0-28, and the higher the score the greater the severity of insomnia.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  4. effectiveness: the sleep quality improvement was assessed by Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS).

    the sleep quality improvement was assessed by Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS). DSIS: An 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Pain did not interfere with sleep") to 10 ("Pain completely interfered with sleep" \[inability to sleep due to pain\]). Subjects will recall sleep interference over the preceding 24 hours each morning and record scores.

    Time frame: Up to 28 weeks

  5. effectiveness: the depression improvement was assessed by Hamilton depression (HAMD) scale.

    The depression improvement was assessed by Hamilton depression (HAMD) scale. HAMD: 17-item version implemented in this protocol. Trained raters will conduct combined evaluations through structured interviews and behavioral observations.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  6. effectiveness: the degree of depression improvement was assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

    The degree of depression improvement was assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).PHQ-9: Used to screen patients for depressive disorders. The PHQ-9 scale has 9 items, each of which is a 4-point scale from 0-3. According to the scale, the PHQ-9 score is divided into 5 groups: 0-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, and 20-27, corresponding to no, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  7. effectiveness: the anxiety improvement was assessed by Hamilton anxiety (HAMA) scale.

    The anxiety improvement was assessed by Hamilton anxiety (HAMA) scale. HAMA: 14-item clinician-administered scale recognized as a primary diagnostic tool for anxiety disorders according to the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders-3 (CCMD-3).

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  8. effectiveness: the degree of anxiety improvement was assessed by Generalized Anxiexy Disorde-7 (GAD-9).

    The degree of anxiety improvement was assessed by Generalized Anxiexy Disorde-7 (GAD-9). The GAD-7 is a widely used self-assessment scale for anxiety symptoms that has been used in recent years to screen not only for anxiety disorders, but also for panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The scale consists of 7 items that rate tension, uncontrollable worry, excessive worry, inability to relax, inability to sit still, irritability, and feelings of foreboding. The number of days in the last 2 weeks that the target symptom was present was assessed: 0 for no symptoms, 1 for a few days, 2 for more than half of the days, and 3 for almost every day. A total score of 5 to 9 is considered mild, 10 to 14 is moderate, and 15 to 21 is severe.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  9. effectiveness: the degree of quality of life improvement was assessed by EuroQOL, 5 Domains, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L).

    The degree of quality of life improvement was assessed by EuroQOL, 5 Domains, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L is a set of standardised scales to measure health status. The EQ-5D-5L consists of two parts, the EQ-5D-5L Health Descriptor System and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L Health Descriptor System describes five dimensions: mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Comfort, Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension consists of five levels: 1 No difficulty, 2 Some difficulty, 3 Moderate difficulty, 4 Severe difficulty, and 5 Unable to perform/very severe difficulty. Responses to the five dimensions generate a five-digit code describing the state of health, with a state of health of 11111 indicating no problems on any of the five dimensions.The EQ-VAS records the self-assessed state of health on a vertical, visually analogue scale, with the ends of the scale labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  10. effectiveness: the quality of life improvement was assessed by Patient global impression of change (PGIC).

    the quality of life improvement was assessed by Patient global impression of change (PGIC). PGIC: A 7-point scale assessing subjects' overall perception changes following treatment: 1 = Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 3 = Minimally improved; 4 = No change; 5 = Minimally worse; 6 = Much worse; 7 = Very much worse.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the effectiveness observation period

  11. immunogenicity endpoint: AAV antibody titres

    Use of specific antibodies for AAV antibody titre testing

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks

  12. Antigen-specific T-cell responses

    Antigen-specific T-cell responses

    Time frame: Up to 28 weeks

  13. Pharmacokinetic profile: Carrier genome levels in urine, blood, tears, nasal secretions

    Carrier genome levels in urine, blood, tears, nasal secretions

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. fMRI: Neuronal activation in ACC brain regions and connectivity of ACC brain regions with other brain regions

    fMRI: is a radiation-free, non-invasive functional imaging technique that detects the level of neuronal activation in brain tissue by probing blood oxygen saturation and water levels in brain tissue. In this programme, local brain activity (activation of neurons in brain regions) and brain integration (functional connectivity between brain regions) are assessed, especially in the ACC brain region.

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks

  2. Drug Dose Reduction

    After the patient is treated with GA intracranial injections combined with oral clozapine and the pain symptoms improve, the previous analgesic medication of patients may be considered to be gradually tapered off

    Time frame: up to 28 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06596681
Responsible party
yilong Wang (chief physician, professor, Beijing Tiantan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Sep 11, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 31, 2026

Study contacts

Yahui Zhu, Doctor
Contact
zhuyahuidr@sina.com
13439182912
Yilong Wang, Doctor
study chair · Beijng tiantan hospital
Hua Pan, Doctor
study director · Beijng tiantan hospital
Fang Luo, Doctor
study director · Beijng tiantan hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion