ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02354833Updated Jan 4, 2017Results posted

Phenylephrine vs. Norepinephrine Infusion After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Phenylephrine and Norepinephrine in Effects of; Anesthesia, in Labor and Delivery, sponsored by West Virginia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-04.

Sponsored by West Virginia University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if a medication called phenylephrine, which helps to control blood pressure, is more effective as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion compared to continuous IV norepinephrine in maintaining blood pressure during a spinal anesthetic for a cesarean delivery. Good blood pressure control has been shown to decrease nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. For elective cesarean delivery, all participants will receive spinal anesthesia with a local anesthetic and morphine (provides long term pain control after cesarean delivery). This study plans to enroll 80 pregnant research subjects 18 years and above. Patients will be randomly assigned according to a computer generated system to be in one of two groups.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a prospective, experimental, observational, randomized open label, active treatment controlled trial.

After written and informed consent are obtained, the study participants are randomly assigned using a computer generated table to 1 of 2 treatment groups prior to cesarean delivery.

Group A will consist of: A continuous phenylephrine infusion 0.1 mcg/kg/min to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 100-120% of baseline before the spinal.

Group B will consist of: A continuous norepinephrine infusion 0.05 mcg/kg/min to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 100-120% of baseline before the spinal.

Patients will be admitted to holding area. Baseline arterial blood pressure and heart rate will be measured in supine position, with left uterine displacement. Baseline blood pressure will be calculated by taking the mean of three consecutive SBP measurements taken 5 minutes apart. IV will be placed. Intravenous ondansetron 4 mg and up to 500 mL of Lactated Ringers solution administered prior to induction of spinal anesthesia.

The primary endpoint is the number of provider interventions needed to maintain the SBP within 100-120% of baseline for both groups. The secondary endpoint is nausea measured with each provider intervention after induction of spinal anesthesia, and immediately following delivery with 11 point verbal rating scale (0 = no nausea, 10 = worst possible nausea). Patients will also be instructed to report episodes of nausea at any other time during the study. Emesis will be recorded whenever present during the surgical procedure.

Hypertensive episodes (SBP greater than 120% of baseline) will be treated with cessation of infusion. Infusion will be restarted when SBP has decreased to below the upper limit of the target range (120% of baseline SBP). If the infusion must be stopped on three occasions, it will be discontinued permanently and the blood pressure maintained with phenylephrine boluses only.

Bradycardia (HR less than 50 BPM) will be treated with glycopyrrolate 0.4mg IV or ephedrine 5 mg - 10 mg IV bolus.

Study participants will receive a standard spinal anesthetic consisting of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.6 mL) plus preservative free morphine (0.2 mg) and fentanyl (20 mcg) at L3-4 or L4-5 interspace (the standard of care for spinal anesthesia at Ruby Memorial Hospital). Prior to surgical incision, the spinal sensory level will be tested to the bilateral T4 dermatomal level which is necessary for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The patients will be positioned supine with a wedge placed under the right hip to avoid aortocaval compression. Both the patient and the clinical research assistant (who will collect data) will not be blinded as to the administered phenylephrine infusion or norepinephrine infusion. The study will end when care is transferred to the labor and delivery room nurse.

Measured variables will include blood pressure (BP), the number and type of provider interventions for control of blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO) as measured by a noninvasive CO monitor, APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, nausea and vomiting, and fetal cord blood analysis at delivery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Effects of; Anesthesia, in Labor and Delivery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hypotension
  • Cesarean Delivery
  • Phenylephrine
  • Spinal Anesthesia
  • Norepinephrine
03

In context

Hypotension

1,021 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypotension; 172 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is close to the median of 80 across 686 interventional studies indexed under Hypotension.

Browse Hypotension studies →

Lead sponsor

West Virginia University is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification 1 and 2
  • Pregnant women with singleton pregnancy
  • Gestational age greater than 36 weeks
  • Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of cardiac medication or medication for blood pressure control
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Multiple gestation
  • Gestation diabetes requiring insulin
  • History of postoperative nausea and vomiting
  • Refusal to be in study
  • Gastric bypass surgery
  • History of chronic opioid use (chronic pain syndrome)
  • Emergent caesarean delivery for maternal and/or fetal distress
  • Eclampsia
  • Progressive neurologic disease
  • Infection at insertion site
  • Allergy to local anesthetics, narcotics or other study medications.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phenylephrine

    A continuous phenylephrine infusion at 0.1 mcg/kg/min

    Drug: Phenylephrine

  • Experimental
    Norepinephrine

    A continuous norepinephrine infusion at 0.05 mcg/kg/min

    Drug: Norepinephrine

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Rescue Boluses to Maintain SBP

    Number of rescue boluses to maintain the SBP within 100-120% of baseline

    Time frame: At time of surgery, up to 2 hours

  2. Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Ephedrine (mg) to Maintain SBP

    Time frame: At time of surgery, up to 2 hours

  3. Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Phenylephrine (mcg) to Maintain SBP

    Time frame: At time of surgery, up to 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Both Nausea and Emesis

    Time frame: At time of surgery, up to 2 hours

07

Results

Posted Jan 4, 2017
Limitations and caveats
38 subjects were enrolled in the phenylephrine group and none excluded. 47 subjects were enrolled in the norepinephrine group; 4 patients excluded (2 patients due to monitoring equipment failure, and 2 patients due to emergency cesarean deliveries).

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhenylephrineNorepinephrine
Started3843
Completed3843
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Rescue Boluses to Maintain SBP

Number of rescue boluses to maintain the SBP within 100-120% of baseline

Time frame:
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Number · rescue boluses
Number of Rescue Boluses to Maintain SBP
rescue bolusesPhenylephrineNorepinephrine
Number of Rescue Boluses to Maintain SBP2521
Statistical analysis
  • Phenylephrine vs Norepinephrine · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.12
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Experiencing Both Nausea and Emesis
Time frame:
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Both Nausea and Emesis
percentage of participantsPhenylephrineNorepinephrine
Percentage of participants with Nausea63.2 (47.9 to 78.5)51.2 (36.3 to 66.1)
Percentage of participants with Emesis26.3 (12.3 to 40.3)16.3 (5.3 to 27.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Phenylephrine vs Norepinephrine · Chi-squared · p = 0.28
  • Phenylephrine vs Norepinephrine · Chi-squared · p = < 0.001
PrimaryMedian Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Ephedrine (mg) to Maintain SBP
Time frame:
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Median · mg
Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Ephedrine (mg) to Maintain SBP
mgPhenylephrineNorepinephrine
Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Ephedrine (mg) to Maintain SBP0 (0 to 85)0 (0 to 30)
Statistical analysis
  • Phenylephrine vs Norepinephrine · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.10
PrimaryMedian Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Phenylephrine (mcg) to Maintain SBP
Time frame:
At time of surgery, up to 2 hours
Reported as:
Median · mcg
Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Phenylephrine (mcg) to Maintain SBP
mcgPhenylephrineNorepinephrine
Median Total Rescue Bolus Dose of Phenylephrine (mcg) to Maintain SBP50 (0 to 1000)100 (0 to 700)
Statistical analysis
  • Phenylephrine vs Norepinephrine · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.73

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phenylephrine—0/38 (0%)24/38 (63.2%)
Norepinephrine—0/43 (0%)22/43 (51.2%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPhenylephrineNorepinephrine
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders24/3822/43

Baseline characteristics

We conducted a prospective, observational, randomized, open labeled trial on parturient scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PhenylephrineNorepinephrineTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years384381
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PhenylephrineNorepinephrineTotal
Mean29.1 ± 5.631.2 ± 6.830.15 ± 6.2
Gender
Gender(Participants)PhenylephrineNorepinephrineTotal
Female384381
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PhenylephrineNorepinephrineTotal
United States384381
08

Study locations

1 site
  • West Virginia University Hospital
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3. PubMed 23076903 ↗
  • Djabatey EA, Barclay PM. Difficult and failed intubation in 3430 obstetric general anaesthetics. Anaesthesia. 2009 Nov;64(11):1168-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06060.x. PubMed 19825049 ↗
  • Ohpasanon P, Chinachoti T, Sriswasdi P, Srichu S. Prospective study of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section at Siriraj Hospital: incidence and risk factors, Part 2. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):675-80. PubMed 18672631 ↗
  • Lin FQ, Qiu MT, Ding XX, Fu SK, Li Q. Ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an updated meta-analysis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Jul;18(7):591-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00345.x. PubMed 22759268 ↗
  • Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2002 Apr;94(4):920-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200204000-00028. PubMed 11916798 ↗
  • Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1230-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f2eae1. Epub 2010 Sep 14. PubMed 20841418 ↗
  • Allen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1221-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1db21. Epub 2010 May 21. PubMed 20495139 ↗
  • Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Apr;92(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh088. Epub 2004 Feb 20. PubMed 14977792 ↗
  • Doherty A, Ohashi Y, Downey K, Carvalho JC. Phenylephrine infusion versus bolus regimens during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial to assess hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1343-50. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826ac3db. Epub 2012 Sep 25. PubMed 23011562 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2014, a primary completion of Aug 2015 and a completion of Aug 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2017, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 20, 2015
First posted
Feb 3, 2015
Start
Aug 2014
Primary completionActual
Aug 2015
CompletionActual
Aug 2015
Results first posted
Jan 4, 2017
Last update
Jan 4, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 4, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02354833
Responsible party
Manuel C. Vallejo MD , DMD (Chair; Professor, West Virginia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 3, 2015
Start date
Aug 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Aug 2015
Results posted
Jan 4, 2017
Last update
Jan 4, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Phenylephrine · Norepinephrine

Start the discussion