An interventional study of Laser and Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-12-08.
Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Purpose: To compare the effects of macular photocoagulation with or without intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or triamcinolone (IVTA) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Casuistic and Methods: 58 eyes of 44 patients with diffuse DME were randomized to receive either IVB + focal/grid laser (IVB-Laser, n=19), IVTA + focal/grid laser (IVTA-Laser, n=16) or focal/grid laser alone (Laser, n=23). Ophthalmic evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central macular thickness (CMT) were performed at baseline and monthly for 12 months.
841 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Edema; 56 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 619 interventional studies indexed under Macular Edema.
Browse Macular Edema studies →University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intravitreal Bevacizumab combined with focal laser therapy
Device: Laser · Drug: Bevacizumab
Intravitreal Triamcinolone combined with focal laser therapy
Device: Laser · Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide
focal laser therapy
Device: Laser
focal macular laser therapy
Intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab
Intravitreal injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide
Central subfield macular thickness
retinal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography
Time frame: 12 months
Visual acuity
Best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 12 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Sao Paulo