ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07519707Updated Jul 22, 2026

Video Intervention to Improve Understanding of Diabetic Retinopathy at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center

An interventional study of Animated Videos in Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and Macular Edema (ME), sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will evaluate whether videos can improve understanding of diabetic eye disease, and follow-up rates in the eye clinic.

Read the detailed description

Health literacy is a prevalent issue at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, particularly at the eye clinic where understanding of diagnoses and treatment plans largely affect vision outcomes. This study will determine whether video-based explanations, created in both English and Spanish, of diabetic retinopathy can improve knowledge concordance and follow up rates among patients in the eye clinic. Knowledge concordance and patient satisfaction will be assessed through digital surveys in Qualtrics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
  • Macular Edema (ME)

Keywords

  • diabetic retinopathy
  • diabetes
  • ophthalmology
  • vision
  • health literacy
03

In context

Diabetic Retinopathy

778 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Retinopathy; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 80 across 481 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Retinopathy.

Browse Diabetic Retinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus with or without diabetic retinopathy
  • Scheduled visit to ZSFG clinic is specifically for diabetes mellitus or diabetic retinopathy care
  • Able to speak and understand English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to view or understand the videos due to significant vision obstruction or impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group

    Videos

    Behavioral: Animated Videos

  • No intervention
    Control

    Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralAnimated Videos

    Animated videos (in English and Spanish) that describe diabetic retinopathy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Knowledge Concordance Assessed through Validated Questionarres

    Validated questionnaires in Qualtrics consisting of multiple choice questions and scales from 0 through 10 will be used to assess knowledge concordance before and after the patient's appointment. The change in concordance will be determined for each patient.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Follow Up Adherence, Assessed through Electronic Record Review

    The number of scheduled follow-up appointments versus the number of attended follow-up appointments will be compared for each patient through electronic record review.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Diabetic Retinopathy Progression, Assessed through Electronic Health Record Review

    Electronic health records and ocular imaging will be reviewed to determine whether patients' diabetic retinopathy has progressed or improved. The numbers of patients with mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy will be compared between groups at the end of the study period.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 15 months later.

Of 111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Retinopathy, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 126 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2026
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Jul 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07519707
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Sriranjani Padmanabhan, MD
Contact
eyestudy@ucsf.edu
415-353-2020
Sriranjani Padmanabhan, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion