CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07705607Updated Jul 15, 2026

A Clinical Trial of MK-8748 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (MK-8748-005)

A Phase 3 interventional study of MK-8748 and Aflibercept in Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Edema, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). In this trial, researchers want to learn if a trial medicine called MK-8748 can treat DME. An available standard (usual) treatment for DME is aflibercept. However, standard treatments such as aflibercept may not work for every person.

The main goal of this trial is to learn if MK-8748 works as well as aflibercept to treat DME.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Macular Edema

Keywords

  • Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The main inclusion criteria include but are not limited to the following:

  • Has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus and a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of ≤12%
  • Has a decrease in vision in the study eye determined by the Investigator to be primarily the result of diabetic macular edema (DME)
  • For participants who are treatment-naïve for DME, the diagnosis must have been made within 9 months of screening. For all treatment-experienced participants, the first treatment should have been no longer than 3 years prior to the Screening visit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The main exclusion criteria include but are not limited to the following:

  • Has had renal failure requiring renal transplant, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis or has renal failure anticipated to require hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis at any time during the study
  • Has history of stroke (cerebral vascular accident) or myocardial infarction within 180 days to first dose of study intervention
  • Has newly diagnosed or previously untreated diabetes mellitus and initiated oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication within 3 months to first dose of study intervention
  • Has history of cataract surgery and/or minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in the study eye within 90 days of screening
  • Has any treatment for complications of cataract surgery with steroids or yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy in the study eye within 90 days of screening
  • Has advanced or uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye
  • Has any history of retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment in the study eye
  • Has active retinal disease other than the condition under investigation in the study eye
  • Has uncontrolled blood pressure at screening
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MK-8748 Low Dose

    Participants receive 5 initial administrations of MK-8748 low dose every 4 weeks (Q4W), then continue to receive MK-8748 low dose every 8 weeks (Q8W) until week 48. After week 48, participants will be treated at intervals determined based on individualized response to treatment, up to week 100.

    Drug: MK-8748

  • Experimental
    MK-8748 High Dose

    Participants receive 5 initial administrations of MK-8748 high dose every 4 weeks (Q4W), then continue to receive MK-8748 high dose every 8 weeks (Q8W) until week 48. After week 48, participants will be treated at intervals determined based on individualized response to treatment, up to week 100.

    Drug: MK-8748

  • Active comparator
    Aflibercept 2 mg

    Participants receive 5 initial administrations of aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), then continue to receive aflibercept 2mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) until week 100.

    Drug: Aflibercept

Interventions

  • DrugMK-8748

    Administered by intravitreal injection (IVT)

    Also known as: EYE201, Tiespectus

  • DrugAflibercept

    Administered by intravitreal injection (IVT)

    Also known as: Eylea

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] Letters) From Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. Mean change in ETDRS letters from baseline to Year 1 will be assessed.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) from Baseline to Week 52

    Central subfield thickness (CST) in the study eye will be measured in microns using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean change in CST from baseline to Year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  2. Mean Change in CST from Baseline Over Time

    Central subfield thickness (CST) in the study eye will be measured in microns using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean change in CST from baseline over time will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  3. Time to Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) at Week 52

    The absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is defined as a Central Subfield Thickness (CST) of \<300 μm measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The time to absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) in the study eye up to Week 52 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 52

  4. Proportion of Participants with Absence of Intraretinal Fluid Over Time

    Participants' intraretinal fluid in the study eye will be measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The proportion of participants with absence of intraretinal fluid over time will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  5. Proportion of Participants with Absence of Subretinal Fluid Over Time

    Participants' subretinal fluid in the study eye will be measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The proportion of participants with absence of subretinal fluid over time will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  6. Proportion of Participants with Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid Over Time

    Participants' subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid in the study eye will be measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The proportion of participants with absence of intraretinal and subretinal fluid over time will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  7. Proportion of Participants with Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) Score Improvement of ≥2 Steps from Baseline to Year 1

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The proportion of participants with ≥2 step improvement in DRSS score from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  8. Proportion of Participants with DRSS Score Improvement of ≥3 Steps from Baseline to Year 1

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The proportion of participants with ≥3 step improvement in DRSS score from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  9. Proportion of Participants with Resolution of Macular Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography (FA) at Week 24

    Fluorescein Angiography (FA) images will be used to determine the resolution of macular leakage in the study eye, defined as 0 to 1 mm\^2. The proportion of participants with resolution of macular leakage at Week 24 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 24

  10. Mean change in Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Central Subfield Thickness (CST) from Baseline to Week 104

    Central subfield thickness (CST) in the study eye will be measured in microns using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean change in OCT CST from baseline to Week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

  11. Proportion of Participants with DRSS Score Improvement of ≥2 Steps from Baseline to Week 104

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The proportion of participants with ≥2 step improvement in DRSS score from baseline to week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

  12. Proportion of Participants with DRSS Score Improvement of ≥3 Steps from Baseline to Week 104

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The proportion of participants with ≥3 step improvement in DRSS score from baseline to week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

  13. Proportion of Participants Without Retinal Fluid at the Foveal Center on OCT at Week 104

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to measure retinal fluid at the foveal center of the study eye. The proportion of participants without retinal fluid at the foveal center on OCT at Week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 104

  14. Mean change in Foveal Avascular Zone (FAZ) Area on Fluorescein Angiography (FA) from Baseline to Year 1

    Fluorescein Angiography (FA) images will be used to measure the Foveal Avascular Zone (FAZ) area of the study eye. The mean change in FAZ area on FA from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  15. Proportion of Participants with Reduction in FAZ Area on FA from Baseline to Year 1

    Fluorescein Angiography (FA) images will be used to measure the Foveal Avascular Zone (FAZ) area of the study eye. The proportion of participants with reduction of FAZ area on FA from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  16. Proportion of Participants Without Retinal Fluid at the Foveal Center at Week 52

    Participants' retinal fluid in the study eye will be measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The proportion of participants without retinal fluid at the foveal center at week 52 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 52

  17. Mean Number of Intravitreal (IVT) Injections from Week 56 to Week 104

    The mean number of intravitreal (IVT) Injections from week 56 to week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 48 Weeks

  18. Proportion of Participants on a Personalized Treatment Interval (PTI) of every 8 weeks (Q8W) at Week 104

    The proportion of participants on a personalized treatment interval (PTI) of every 8 weeks (Q8W) at Week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 104

  19. Proportion of Participants on a Personalized Treatment Interval (PTI) of every 12 weeks (Q12W) at Week 104

    The proportion of participants on a personalized treatment interval (PTI) of every 12 weeks (Q12W) at Week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 104

  20. Proportion of Participants on a Personalized Treatment Interval (PTI) of every 16 weeks (Q16W) at Week 104

    The proportion of participants on a personalized treatment interval (PTI) of every 16 weeks (Q16W) at Week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 104

  21. Proportion of Participants who Gain ≥5 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who gain ≥5 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  22. Proportion of Participants who Gain ≥10 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who gain ≥10 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  23. Proportion of Participants who Gain ≥15 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who gain ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  24. Proportion of Participants who Lose ≥5 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who lose ≥5 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  25. Proportion of Participants who Lose ≥10 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who lose ≥10 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  26. Proportion of participants who Lose ≥15 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who lose ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 Year

  27. Time to gain ≥5 ETDRS Letters Over Time

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The time to gain ≥5 ETDRS letters over time will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  28. Time to gain ≥10 ETDRS Letters at Week 52

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The time to gain ≥10 ETDRS letters up to Week 52 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 52

  29. Time to gain ≥15 ETDRS letters at Week 52

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The time to gain ≥15 ETDRS letters up to Week 52 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately Week 52

  30. Mean Change in BCVA (ETDRS letters) from Baseline Over Time

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The mean change in BCVA (ETDRS) letters from baseline over time will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 Years

  31. Proportion of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better at Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/20 or better is defined as ≥84 letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart. The proportion of participants with BCVA Snellen equivalent of 20/20 or better at year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 1 year

  32. Proportion of Participants with BCVA Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or worse is defined as ≤38 letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart. The proportion of participants with BCVA Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 1 year

  33. Proportion of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Year 1

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better is defined as ≥69 letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart. The proportion of participants with BCVA Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better at year 1 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 1 year

  34. Mean Change in BCVA from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. Mean change in ETDRS letters from baseline to year 2 will be assessed.

    Time frame: Baseline and Year 2

  35. Proportion of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better at Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better is defined as ≥69 letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart. The proportion of participants with BCVA Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better at year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  36. Proportion of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or worse is defined as ≤38 letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart. The proportion of participants with BCVA Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or Worse at year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  37. Proportion of Participants who Gain ≥5 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who gain ≥5 ETDRS Letters from baseline to year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 Years

  38. Proportion of Participants who Gain ≥10 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who gain ≥10 ETDRS Letters from baseline to year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 Years

  39. Proportion of Participants who Gain ≥15 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who gain ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 Years

  40. Proportion of Participants who Lose ≥5 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who lose ≥5 ETDRS Letters baseline to year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Years

  41. Proportion of Participants who Lose ≥10 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who lose ≥10 ETDRS letters from baseline to year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Years

  42. Proportion of Participants who Lose ≥15 ETDRS Letters from Baseline to Year 2

    Participants' BCVA in the study eye will be measured using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) methodology. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better visual acuity. The proportion of participants who lose ≥15 ETDRS Letters from baseline to year 2 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

  43. Change from Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) Version Composite Score at Week 48

    The NEI-VFQ-25 is a validated and reliable 25-item survey that measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on generic health domains (emotional well-being, social functioning and task-oriented domains). The composite score ranges from 0-100 with the higher score indicating better visual function. The change from baseline in NEI-VFQ-25 version composite score at week 48 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

  44. Change from Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) Version Composite Score at Week 104

    The NEI-VFQ-25 is a validated and reliable 25-item survey that measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on generic health domains (emotional well-being, social functioning and task-oriented domains). The composite score ranges from 0-100 with the higher score indicating better visual function. The change from baseline in NEI-VFQ-25 version composite score at week 104 will be presented.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 104

  45. Number of Participants who Experience a Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who experience a systemic AE will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  46. Number of Participants who Experience an Ocular Adverse Events (AEs)

    An ocular adverse event (OAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence involving the eye or ocular adnexa (including eyelids, conjunctiva, lacrimal apparatus, extraocular muscles, and orbit) that: Occurs or worsens after the first administration of the investigational product (IP) or a study-related ocular procedure, and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the IP or procedure. OAEs include, but are not limited to, changes in: Symptoms (e.g., ocular pain, photophobia, floaters, blurred vision), Visual function (e.g., best-corrected visual acuity \[BCVA\], visual field). Intraocular pressure (IOP), Anterior segment findings (e.g., conjunctival hyperemia, keratitis, anterior chamber inflammation), Posterior segment findings (e.g., vitreous inflammation, retinal hemorrhages, retinal tears or detachment, macular edema), or ocular adnexa (e.g., eyelid edema, ptosis). The number of participants who experience an ocular AE will be presented.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  47. Number of Participants who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AE

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years

  48. Number of Participants with Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) to MK-8748

    Blood samples collected at designated timepoints will be used to determine the ADA response to MK-8748. The number of participants with ADA to MK-8748 will be presented.

    Time frame: At designated time points (up to approximately 104 weeks)

  49. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8748

    Cmax is defined as the peak concentration over the dosing interval. Blood samples collected pre-dose and at multiple timepoints post-dose will be used to determine Cmax of MK-8748.

    Time frame: At designated time points (up to approximately 104 weeks)

  50. Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of MK-8748

    Ctrough is defined as the trough concentration. Blood samples collected pre-dose and at multiple timepoints post-dose will be used to determine Ctrough of MK-8748.

    Time frame: At designated time points (up to approximately 104 weeks)

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — https://trialstransparency.msdclinicaltrials.com/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07705607
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion