ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02060747OPTIPOSTUpdated Feb 23, 2017

Optimization of Osteoporosis Management Among Patients Older Than 45 Years Old With Low Energy Fracture.

An interventional study of Coordinator-based post fracture program in Osteoporosis, Management Care, Fracture, sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 95 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-23.

Sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2013, registered Jan 2014).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
480
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 95 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Harrington's metaphorical depiction captures the essence of the problem : "Osteoporosis care of fracture patients has been characterized as the Bermuda Triangle made up of orthopaedists, primary care physicians and osteoporosis experts into which the fracture patient disappears".

The most effective way to achieve this goal is through implementation of coordinator-based post fracture models of care. Exemplar models have been refered to as "Fracture Liaison Service" (United-Kingdom [1-3], Europe [4,5] and Australia [6-8]) "Osteoporosis Coordinator Program" (Canada [9,10]) or "Care Manager Programs" (USA [11,12]).

The objective of this trial is to assess efficacy of a new coordinator-based post-fracture program in the Saint-Joseph Hospital in Paris to improve the management of osteoporosis after fracture thanks to an optimal recommendations practice to reduce the incidence of secondary fractures.

Men and women are included aged over 45 years with fragility wrist and hip fractures.

Evaluation criteria are based on the evidence-based assessment (stratify risk, identify secondary causes of osteoporosis, fracture evaluation), the medication adherence, others prescriptions adherence (osteodensitometry), the incidence of secondary fractures and number of falls.

Number of patients : 200 Duration of the study: 3 years Patients' participation duration: 6 months

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis, Management Care, Fracture
03

In context

Osteoporosis

1,675 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 211 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 480 is above the median of 95 across 1,152 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.

Browse Osteoporosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph is the lead sponsor of 344 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 95 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women over 45 years
  • Fragility wrist and hip fractures
  • Volunteer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Public route accident
  • Emergency illness associated
  • Short life expectancy
  • Not volunteer
  • Bedridden patient
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
480 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Coordinator-based post fracture program

    The intervention arm deals with the intervention of a nurse trained in the management of osteoporosis fractures assisted by a clinical research technician who will manage the logistics and reglementary aspects of the study (patient enrollment, quality and study proceedings).

    Behavioral: Coordinator-based post fracture program

  • No intervention
    standard care

Interventions

  • BehavioralCoordinator-based post fracture program
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patient with a correct management care.

    This outcome is a composite outcome wich differ with each fracture type. It will be assess 6 months after patient inclusion. An adequate management care is defined for each fracture as below. * For wrist fracture: medical visit at J15, osteodensitometry, therapeutic decision if necessary (if not, reasons have to be precised in medical sheet). * For hip fracture: osteodensitometry if necessary, therapeutic (chronic care) decision if necessary (if not, reasons have to be precised in medical sheet).

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient adherence to their osteoporosis medication (Morisky composite score) and exploration (osteodensitometry).

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of rehospitalisation for fracture.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Number of falls over 6 months post-inclusion.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
    Paris, 75014, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. Mc Lellan AR and al. Osteoprosis Int. 2003; 1028-1034 2. Wright SA and al. Rheumatol Int 2005; 489-490 3. Clunie G and al. J Orthop Nurs 2008; 156-162 4. Boudou L and al. Osteoporos Int 2011; 2099-2016 5. Huntjzens KM ana al. Osteoporos Int 2011; 2119-2135 6. Cooper MS and al. Osteoporos Int 2012; 97-107 7. Inderjeeth CA and al. Med J Aus 2010; 149-153 8. Lih A and al. Osteoporos Int 2011; 849-858 9. Bogoch ER and al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 25-34 10. SAbder B abd al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 1197-1205 11. Dell R and al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 188-194 12. Greene D and al. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2010; 326-329

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2013 to primary completion in Oct 2016, 39 months.

Of 228 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoporosis, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 44. This study's 39 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 246 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2014
First posted
Feb 12, 2014
StartActual
Jul 1, 2013
Primary completionActual
Oct 7, 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 2016
Last update
Feb 23, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02060747
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2014
Start date
Jul 1, 2013
Primary completion
Oct 7, 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Last update
Feb 23, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion