CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07791069RESTRICTUpdated Sep 15, 2026

International Multicenter Outcomes of Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors in Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease

An observational study in Congenital Heart Disease, sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph. Enrolling by invitation at 5 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 3 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
Up to 3 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The international multicenter registry aims to collect real-world data on clinical outcomes and evaluate the net clinical success of transcatheter microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, international, non-randomized, non-interventional, observational post-marketing clinical follow-up study with retrospective and prospective data collection, designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of off-label implantation of microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Heart Disease

Keywords

  • Pulmonary flow restriction
  • microvascular plug
  • pulmonary artery banding
  • staged palliation
  • single-ventricle physiology
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 3 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pediatric patients (≤3 years) with any congenital or acquired heart disease, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or geographic location, who underwent transcatheter insertion of the MVP-based PFR device in single or bilateral PA branches between January 2019 and January 2028.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pediatric patients (≤3 years) with any congenital or acquired heart disease, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or geographic location, who underwent transcatheter insertion of the MVP-based PFR device in single or bilateral PA branches between January 2019 and January 2028.
  • Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study device implanted in other locations: modified BT shunt, arterial duct, stented arterial duct, Sano conduit, and central shunt.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
24 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscatheter pulmonary flow restriction

    Transcatheter implantation of a microvascular plug (MVP)-based pulmonary flow restrictor (PFR) in a single or bilateral pulmonary artery (PA) branch(es).

    Also known as: Percutaneous pulmonary flow restriction, Endovascular pulmonary flow restriction

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Net clinical success

    Composite non-hierarchical net clinical success, evaluated at the time of surgical PFR removal (either as a standalone procedure or during target surgery), and defined by meeting the following three criteria: 1) technical success (successful implantation and retention\* of the MVP device in each branch PA), 2) clinical success (evidence of PBF restriction\*\* at PFR removal), and 3) safety success (no major adverse device-related events (MADREs).

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical implantation success

    Technical success of PFR implantation (device successfully delivered, deployed, and retained in each branch PA) at hospital discharge after the index procedure.

    Time frame: From date of device implant until hospital discharge, assessed up to 6 weeks

  2. Immediate flow restriction success

    Immediate flow restriction success of MVP-based PFRs, defined as technical success and evidence of pulmonary blood flow (BPF) restriction, at procedure conclusion (Evidence of PBF restriction at procedure conclusion was defined as a minimal drop in oxygen saturation on arterial blood gas by 10% at the same level of FiO2 compared to preoperative levels, a systolic-diastolic Doppler-pattern across the PFRs with a minimum peak Doppler gradient of 40 mmHg (Vmax=3.2 m/s) on per-procedural ultrasound assessment, and, when performed, a reduction in the baseline QP/QS mismatch by 50%).

    Time frame: From device implant to procedure conclusion

  3. Safety success

    Safety success (freedom from MADREs\*, vascular-, or procedure-related SAEs\*\*) at the time of device removal. The severity of MADRE and SAE will be classified using a validated 1-to-5 scale, ranging from none to catastrophic. \*MADREs include device-related vascular erosion, vascular aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, bronchial compression, device collapse, migration, embolization, thrombosis, fracture, infection, endocarditis, resulting in unplanned or anticipated device removal, or redo-intervention (surgical or catheter-based) \*\*SAEs encompassed device- vascular- or procedure-related adverse events resulting in death, life-threatening situations, hospitalization, disability, or major surgical intervention.

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

  4. All cause mortality

    All-cause mortality rate at the time of device removal.

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Freedom from unplanned pulmonary artery (PA) reintervention

    Freedom from unplanned PA reintervention (surgical or catheter-based) until surgical device removal

    Time frame: From date of device implant until the date of surgical device removal, assessed up to 24 months

  2. Freedom from unplanned pulmonary artery intervention post-device removal

    Freedom from unplanned PA intervention at 24 months following surgical device removal (such as angioplasty or stenting for residual stenosis or deformity at the former device site).

    Time frame: From date of surgical device removal through 24 months after removal

06

Study locations

5 sites
  • Marie Lannelongue Hospital
    Le Plessis-Robinson, France
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Mother and Child Health Institute of Serbia
    Belgrade, Serbia
  • Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
    Leeds, United Kingdom
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07791069
Lead sponsor
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Raymond N. Haddad, MD, MHSc, PhDc
principal investigator · Marie Lannelongue Hospital, INSERM, UMR-S1358, UP-Saclay

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion