ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01874951Updated Feb 24, 2017Results posted

Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN) for Depression Relapse and Recurrence

A Phase 2 interventional study of Naltrexone and Placebo in Major Depressive Disorder, Depression, Unipolar and Recurrence, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-24.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine if taking a low dose of naltrexone in addition to an antidepressant medication can help treat relapse or recurrence in people with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved naltrexone for the treatment of alcohol dependence and opioid dependence, but the FDA has not approved naltrexone to treat depression. The investigators hypothesize that patients with breakthrough depression on an antidepressant regimen containing a pro-dopaminergic agent assigned to treatment with low dose naltrexone will demonstrate higher rates of response compared to those patients taking placebo.

Read the detailed description

We carried out a pilot double-blind, randomized, controlled study of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) 1 mg b.i.d. versus placebo augmentation in MDD patients who relapsed on dopaminergic agents. The primary aim was to test the hypothesis that patients experiencing depressive breakthrough would demonstrate greater improvement in their depression when supplementing their current antidepressant regimen with LDN versus placebo, with no significant difference in side effects.

Boston area men and women with MDD were recruited from 01/13/2014-11/11/2014 via Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved newspaper, television, internet, and radio ads initiated by Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Boston Clinical Trials (BCT). Screened and eligible patients returned one week later for a baseline visit and were randomized consecutively to double-blind treatment with placebo or LDN 1 mg b.i.d. The randomization list was generated by an online randomization program and maintained by the research pharmacist. Subjects were treated for 3 weeks, with weekly assessments. All subjects were required to continue on their baseline antidepressant regimen without changes for the duration of the study; they were likewise asked not to modify any other allowed baseline medications that they had been taking prior to entering the study. Adherence was determined by weekly pill counts; protocol violation was defined as less than 80% adherence.

Side effects were assessed at every visit using the Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Effects-Specific Inquiry (SAFTEE-SI) scale (Levine and Schooler, 1992) and categorized by severity as: 0-none, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe. Because some SAFTEE items could be present at baseline, particularly in a sample of subjects taking antidepressants that could themselves produce side effects, we defined as treatment-emergent any SAFTEE side effect for which severity increased by two or more levels (e.g. from none to moderate or from mild to severe) from baseline (Mischoulon et al., 2014). Frequency of side effect was based on the number of patients reporting the side effect at any time during the study.

Suicidal ideation was assessed at each visit using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Subjects considered to be at high risk for suicide were discontinued and referred for further evaluation and hospitalization if clinically indicated. Subjects were also discontinued for any emergence of hypomania, mania, or psychosis; a Clinical Global Improvement (CGI-I) score greater than 5 (e.g., score of 6 or 7); evidence of illicit drug use or problematic alcohol use.

At the end of the double-blind study, both responders and non-responders who completed the double-blind phase had the option of receiving open-label adjunctive treatment with LDN for 3 more weeks.

Paired and independent samples t-tests and their nonparametric counterparts (Wilcoxon's signed ranks and Mann-Whitney U tests) were used to examine and compare outcomes for each treatment arm. All analyses were two-tailed. Response and remission rates, and emergence of side effects were compared by Fisher's exact test. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated by Cohen's d (Cohen, 1988), for between-subjects comparisons (changes in depression scales from baseline to end for LDN vs. placebo) and for within-subjects comparisons (changes in depression scales from baseline to end for each separate treatment group). Correlation coefficients were calculated for use in within-subjects comparisons. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Depression, Unipolar
  • Recurrence
  • Relapse

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Recurrence
  • Relapse
  • Antidepressants
  • Naltrexone
  • Drug augmentation
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

2,805 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 565 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 80 across 2,338 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,582 studies on the registry; 451 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65.
  • Written informed consent.
  • Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) criteria by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), current.
  • Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (QIDS-SR) score of at least 12 at both screen and baseline visits.
  • Received treatment with either an Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) in combination with a dopaminergic agent, or with an antidepressant with a dopaminergic mechanism of action in adequate doses, achieved remission per American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP) Task Force guidelines for ≥3 months, currently in relapse or recurrence without dose change for at least the past 4 weeks, based on meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD.

    1. Dopaminergic agents here include classical stimulants from the amphetamine or methylphenidate families; dopamine agonists (e.g. pramipexole); or dopamine active antidepressants like bupropion.
    2. Additionally, low dose (\< 2.5 mg) Abilify, a D2 partial agonist, is believed to exert pro-dopaminergic effects and will therefore be included as a dopamine agent.
    3. Sertraline, although classified as an SSRI, has dopamine reuptake inhibiting properties believed to be relevant at higher doses (> 150 mg of sertraline), and will also therefore be considered a dopaminergic antidepressant at dose range above.
    4. Based on the finding that the norepinephrine transporter is the reuptake inhibitor for dopamine in the prefrontal cortex and the robust sustained clinical response of a patient on duloxetine and low dose naltrexone, we include duloxetine, traditionally classed as an SNRI, among the dopamine acting antidepressants.)
  • During the baseline visit, patients must be on a stable dose of antidepressant regimen for the past 4 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy).
  • Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit.
  • Patients who demonstrate a greater than 25% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the QIDS-SR total score - screen to baseline.
  • Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician.
  • Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease.
  • Substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past).
  • History of a seizure disorder or clinical evidence of untreated hypothyroidism.
  • Patients requiring excluded medications (including but not limited to chronic or episodic use of anorexiants, episodic hormones, episodic benzodiazepines, episodic insulin, episodic and other episodic psychotropic medications).
  • Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features, as assessed by SCID.
  • History of naltrexone intolerance at any dose.
  • Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania.
  • Inadequate exposure time or dose of current SSRI or Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI); failure to comply with at least 80% of doses.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    In this arm, patients will receive placebo for three weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Naltrexone

    In this arm, patients will receive low dose naltrexone for three weeks.

    Drug: Naltrexone

Interventions

  • 1 mg of naltrexone will be given twice daily to all patients assigned to active drug.

    Also known as: LDN

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo identical in appearance to naltrexone will be given twice daily to all patients assigned to placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HAM-D-17 Total Score

    Hamilton Depression Scale-17 (HAM-D-17) item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 52 to zero, or -52. A maximum increase would be from 18 (the minimum score required for admission) to 52, or +34.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in HAM-D28 Total Score

    Hamilton Depression Scale-28 item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 81 to zero, or -81. A maximum increase would be from 18 (the minimum score required for admission) to 81, or +63.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 3

  2. Change in MADRS-10 Total Score

    Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale- 10 item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 60 to zero, or -60. There is no minimum score on the MADRS-10 required for study entry, since the HAMD-17 was the sole entry criteria. However, a score of 18 on the HAMD17 corresponds to approximately a score of 21 on the MADRS-10. A maximum estimated increase would thus be from 21 to 60, or +39.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 3

  3. Change in MADRS-15 Total Score

    Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale- 15 item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 90 to zero, or -90. There is no minimum score on the MADRS-15 required for study entry, since the HAMD-17 was the sole entry criteria. However, a score of 18 on the HAMD17 corresponds to approximately a score of 21 on the MADRS-10. A maximum estimated increase would thus be from 21 to 90, or +69.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 3

  4. Change in CGI-S Total Score

    Clinical Global Improvement-Severity Scale. The CGI-S score is a one-item scale that measures severity of depression, scored from 1-7, where 1 = no depression is present, 2 = borderline depression, 3 = mild depression, 4 = moderate depression, 5 = marked depression, 6 = severe depression, and 7 = among the most extremely depressed patient. Thus higher scores indicate greater depressive severity. The change in CGI-S score can represent a drop from 7 (maximum severity) to 1 (no depression) or -6. There is no minimum CGI-S score required for admission, but a minimum score of 18 on the HAMD17 corresponds to approximately a score of 4 on the CGI-S. Thus a maximum worsening would be from 4 to 7, or +3.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 3

  5. Final CGI-I Score

    Clinical Global Improvement-Improvement Scale. The CGI-I scale is a one item scale that measures overall change in patient's global condition compared to when they were entered into the study. The scale is graded from 1-7, where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Thus higher scores indicate greater worsening, and lower scores indicate greater improvement. The lowest possible score (indicating maximum improvement) is 1, and the highest possible score (indicating greatest worsening) is 7.

    Time frame: From baseline to week 3

  6. Response Rate

    Response is defined as an improvement in HAM-D-17 score of greater than or equal to 50% compared to baseline score. Response rate is the percent of patients who attain this threshold degree of improvement.

    Time frame: Response rate after 3 weeks

  7. Remission Rate

    Remission is defined as a final HAM-D-17 score of 7 or less. Remission rate is the percent of patients who attain this threshold score.

    Time frame: Remission rate at 3 weeks.

07

Results

Posted Feb 24, 2017
Limitations and caveats
1\) Very small sample. 2) No detailed data about the total number of relapses or recurrences prior to the patients' current regimen. 3) Short double blind treatment period. 4) Focus on antidepressants with dopaminergic activity only.

Participant flow

After approval by our Institutional Review Board (IRB), written informed consent was obtained. Boston area men and women with major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited from 01/13/2014-11/11/2014 via IRB-approved newspaper, television, internet, and radio ads initiated by Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Boston Clinical Trials (BCT).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboNaltrexone
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in HAM-D-17 Total Score

Hamilton Depression Scale-17 (HAM-D-17) item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 52 to zero, or -52. A maximum increase would be from 18 (the minimum score required for admission) to 52, or +34.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in HAM-D-17 Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboNaltrexone
Change in HAM-D-17 Total Score-5.8 ± 5.1-9.5 ± 6.9
SecondaryChange in HAM-D28 Total Score

Hamilton Depression Scale-28 item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 81 to zero, or -81. A maximum increase would be from 18 (the minimum score required for admission) to 81, or +63.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in HAM-D28 Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboNaltrexone
Change in HAM-D28 Total Score-6.5 ± 7.4-14.6 ± 6.7
SecondaryChange in MADRS-10 Total Score

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale- 10 item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 60 to zero, or -60. There is no minimum score on the MADRS-10 required for study entry, since the HAMD-17 was the sole entry criteria. However, a score of 18 on the HAMD17 corresponds to approximately a score of 21 on the MADRS-10. A maximum estimated increase would thus be from 21 to 60, or +39.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in MADRS-10 Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboNaltrexone
Change in MADRS-10 Total Score-7.8 ± 8.5-18.2 ± 5.5
SecondaryChange in MADRS-15 Total Score

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale- 15 item. The change in scores depends on the difference between the initial (baseline) score and the final score at the conclusion of the double blind treatment period. There is no formal range of score changes, since they depend on the initial and final score. A negative score represents a lowering in the score from baseline to end (improvement), and a positive score indicates an increase in score from baseline to end (worsening). A zero score would indicate no change. In theory, the maximum drop in score would be from 90 to zero, or -90. There is no minimum score on the MADRS-15 required for study entry, since the HAMD-17 was the sole entry criteria. However, a score of 18 on the HAMD17 corresponds to approximately a score of 21 on the MADRS-10. A maximum estimated increase would thus be from 21 to 90, or +69.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in MADRS-15 Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboNaltrexone
Change in MADRS-15 Total Score-10.7 ± 10-23.4 ± 6.8
SecondaryChange in CGI-S Total Score

Clinical Global Improvement-Severity Scale. The CGI-S score is a one-item scale that measures severity of depression, scored from 1-7, where 1 = no depression is present, 2 = borderline depression, 3 = mild depression, 4 = moderate depression, 5 = marked depression, 6 = severe depression, and 7 = among the most extremely depressed patient. Thus higher scores indicate greater depressive severity. The change in CGI-S score can represent a drop from 7 (maximum severity) to 1 (no depression) or -6. There is no minimum CGI-S score required for admission, but a minimum score of 18 on the HAMD17 corresponds to approximately a score of 4 on the CGI-S. Thus a maximum worsening would be from 4 to 7, or +3.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in CGI-S Total Score
units on a scalePlaceboNaltrexone
Change in CGI-S Total Score-0.3 ± 0.8-1.3 ± 0.8
SecondaryFinal CGI-I Score

Clinical Global Improvement-Improvement Scale. The CGI-I scale is a one item scale that measures overall change in patient's global condition compared to when they were entered into the study. The scale is graded from 1-7, where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Thus higher scores indicate greater worsening, and lower scores indicate greater improvement. The lowest possible score (indicating maximum improvement) is 1, and the highest possible score (indicating greatest worsening) is 7.

Time frame:
From baseline to week 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Final CGI-I Score
units on a scalePlaceboNaltrexone
Final CGI-I Score3.5 ± 0.82.2 ± 1.2
SecondaryResponse Rate

Response is defined as an improvement in HAM-D-17 score of greater than or equal to 50% compared to baseline score. Response rate is the percent of patients who attain this threshold degree of improvement.

Time frame:
Response rate after 3 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Response Rate
ParticipantsPlaceboNaltrexone
Response Rate13
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Naltrexone · Chi-squared · p = 0.55 (Threshold of statistical significance is 0.05.)Chi-squared value was 1.5.
SecondaryRemission Rate

Remission is defined as a final HAM-D-17 score of 7 or less. Remission rate is the percent of patients who attain this threshold score.

Time frame:
Remission rate at 3 weeks.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Remission Rate
ParticipantsPlaceboNaltrexone
Remission Rate03

Adverse events

Collected over 3 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—0/6 (0%)6/6 (100%)
Naltrexone—0/6 (0%)6/6 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboNaltrexone
Trouble sleepingNervous system disorders0/62/6
Loss of sexual interestReproductive system and breast disorders2/60/6
Problems with sexual arousalReproductive system and breast disorders2/60/6
Delayed or absent orgasmReproductive system and breast disorders2/60/6
NightmaresNervous system disorders1/60/6
IrritablePsychiatric disorders1/60/6
Hearing or seeing thingsPsychiatric disorders0/61/6
Numbness or tinglingNervous system disorders0/61/6
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders1/61/6
Drooling or increased salivationGastrointestinal disorders1/60/6

Baseline characteristics

Twenty-one patients were screened, of which twelve patients were admitted into the study, all men and women with major depressive disorder who had relapsed on a pro-dopaminergic antidepressant regimen.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6612
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
Mean43 ± 1147 ± 1345 ± 12
Gender
Gender(Participants)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
Female134
Male538
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
Hispanic or Latino022
Not Hispanic or Latino538
Unknown or Not Reported112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White538
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported022
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
United States6612
Hamilton-D-17 score
Hamilton-D-17 score(units on a scale)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
Mean23.7 ± 2.321.2 ± 2.022.4 ± 2.4
Hamilton-D-28 score
Hamilton-D-28 score(units on a scale)PlaceboNaltrexoneTotal
Mean26.3 ± 2.626.2 ± 4.026.3 ± 3.2

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital; Depression Research and Clinical Program
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mischoulon D, Hylek L, Yeung AS, Clain AJ, Baer L, Cusin C, Ionescu DF, Alpert JE, Soskin DP, Fava M. Randomized, proof-of-concept trial of low dose naltrexone for patients with breakthrough symptoms of major depressive disorder on antidepressants. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PubMed 27736689 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01874951
Collaborators
Boston Clinical Trials
Responsible party
David Mischoulon, MD (Staff Psychiatrist, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2013
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Results posted
Feb 24, 2017
Last update
Feb 24, 2017

Study contacts

David Mischoulon, M.D.
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Naltrexone

Start the discussion