ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07892287Updated Oct 23, 2026

Effect of Neurofeedback and TMS

An interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Alpha-down EEG Neurofeedback in Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to is to learn whether adding EEG neurofeedback (NFB) to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is safe and feasible for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). The study will also explore whether combining NFB with TMS may improve depression symptoms and change brain activity related to mood, focus, and rumination. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is alpha-down neurofeedback safe, tolerable, and feasible for people with MDD?
  • Does alpha-down neurofeedback improve symptoms of depression, anxiety, and difficulties with attention, emotion regulation, and rumination?
  • Does combining neurofeedback with TMS produce greater changes in symptoms than either treatment alone?

Researchers will compare 3 groups (TMS only, neurofeedback only, and TMS combined with neurofeedback) to see if combining neurofeedback with TMS will produce greater changes in symptoms than either treatment alone.

Participants will:

  • Complete assessments of depression severity, anxiety, and cognitive function.
  • Complete 5 treatment sessions Monday through Friday.
  • Receive alpha-down neurofeedback, TMS, or both, depending on their group assignment.
  • Complete EEG recordings of brain activity before and after treatment.
  • Complete a questionnaire about their experience in the study.
02

Conditions studied

  • Depression - Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Neurofeedback
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Depression
  • Treatment-Resistant Depression
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
03

In context

Depression

8,240 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 84 across 6,869 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,582 studies on the registry; 451 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be between 18 and 65 years old.
  • Have a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), confirmed using standard diagnostic criteria.
  • Have normal hearing and normal or corrected-to-normal vision.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have ever been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, psychosis, autism spectrum disorder, or another neurodevelopmental disorder.
  • Current major depressive episode with suicidal thoughts.
  • Have ever had a seizure or been diagnosed with epilepsy.
  • Have had a significant head injury that resulted in prolonged loss of consciousness, ongoing neurological problems, or a known structural brain abnormality.
  • Are currently intoxicated, experiencing substance withdrawal, or have an unstable pattern of substance use that could make participation unsafe or interfere with the study procedures.
  • Are pregnant or think you may be pregnant.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TMS Only

    Participants will receive treatment-as-usual repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for five consecutive weekdays (Monday through Friday). No study neurofeedback intervention will be provided in this arm.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Experimental
    Neurofeedback and TMS

    Participants will receive standard of care rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), administered daily (Monday through Friday) for five sessions. Neurofeedback training will also be conducted daily for five sessions during the same week. Each neurofeedback session will occur 30 minutes following the rTMS session and will last approximately 20 minutes. Neurofeedback will target downregulation of the alpha frequency band (8-12 Hz) using EEG electrodes at Pz, A1, and A2.

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation · Device: Alpha-down EEG Neurofeedback

  • Experimental
    Neurofeedback only

    Participants will receive five consecutive weekday sessions of alpha-down EEG neurofeedback (Monday through Friday), with each session lasting approximately 20 minutes. Neurofeedback will target downregulation of the alpha frequency band (8-12 Hz) using EEG electrodes at Pz, A1, and A2. No rTMS will be administered as part of the study intervention in this arm.

    Device: Alpha-down EEG Neurofeedback

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) will be delivered using a MagVenture device targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). TMS is delivered through magnetic pulses which induce electrical currents in the brain. TMS will be administered once a day, for 5 consecutive days.

  • DeviceAlpha-down EEG Neurofeedback

    Alpha-down EEG neurofeedback (NFB) will be administered using EEGer 4.4.0 software with electrodes placed at Pz, A1, and A2. Participants will receive visual feedback while training to downregulate alpha-band EEG activity (8-12 Hz). Neurofeedback training will be administered once a day, for 5 consecutive days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility and Tolerability of NFB and rTMS Interventions

    The primary outcome measure will be measured through session completion rates, adverse event frequency, and participant satisfaction.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Depression Symptom Severity as Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

    Changes in depressive symptom severity will be assessed by comparing baseline and post-treatment scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The HAM-D measures the severity of depression based on observations made by trained personnel during a clinical interview. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores representing greater depression symptom severity.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

  2. Changes in Rumination

    Changes in rumination will be assessed by comparing baseline and post-treatment scores of the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS). The Ruminative Responses Scale measures an individual's tendency to repetitively think about negative emotions and engage in self-critical thinking. Scores range from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater levels of rumination.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

  3. Change in Emotion Regulation

    Changes in emotional regulation will be assessed through the baseline and post-treatment scores of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire measures cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating frequent application of emotion regulation strategies.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

  4. Changes in Attentional Control

    Changes in attentional control will be measured through comparing baseline and post-treatment Emotional Stroop task scores. Emotional Stroop measures attentional bias towards emotional stimuli.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

  5. Changes in Alpha-Band EEG Power and Connectivity

    Alpha-band EEG activity will be assessed during EEG recordings. Changes in 8-12 Hz alpha-band power and connectivity from baseline to post-treatment will be measured as neurophysiological change.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

  6. Change in Depression Symptom Severity as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory

    Changes in depression symptom severity will be assessed by comparing baseline and post-treatment Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores. The Beck Depression Inventory is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater depression symptom severity.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in Alcohol Use Behavior

    Changes in alcohol use behavior will be characterized by comparing baseline and post-treatment scores of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption measures the frequency and quantity of drinking. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating hazardous drinking behaviors.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment after 6 days.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nicholson AA, Ros T, Densmore M, Frewen PA, Neufeld RWJ, Theberge J, Jetly R, Lanius RA. A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: A preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102490. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102490. Epub 2020 Nov 5. PubMed 33395981 ↗
  • Nicholson AA, Densmore M, Frewen PA, Neufeld RWJ, Theberge J, Jetly R, Lanius RA, Ros T. Homeostatic normalization of alpha brain rhythms within the default-mode network and reduced symptoms in post-traumatic stress disorder following a randomized controlled trial of electroencephalogram neurofeedback. Brain Commun. 2023 Mar 16;5(2):fcad068. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad068. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37065092 ↗
  • Noda Y, Nakamura M, Saeki T, Inoue M, Iwanari H, Kasai K. Potentiation of quantitative electroencephalograms following prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with major depression. Neurosci Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;77(1-2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 1. PubMed 23827366 ↗
  • Mantini D, Perrucci MG, Del Gratta C, Romani GL, Corbetta M. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):13170-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700668104. Epub 2007 Aug 1. PubMed 17670949 ↗
  • Murphy OW, Hoy KE, Wong D, Bailey NW, Fitzgerald PB, Segrave RA. Individuals with depression display abnormal modulation of neural oscillatory activity during working memory encoding and maintenance. Biol Psychol. 2019 Nov;148:107766. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107766. Epub 2019 Sep 8. PubMed 31509766 ↗
  • Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Jin Y, Phillips B. The relationship between brain oscillatory activity and therapeutic effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 26;7:37. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00037. eCollection 2013. PubMed 23550274 ↗
  • Kazemi R, Rostami R, Nasiri Z, Hadipour AL, Kiaee N, Coetzee JP, Philips A, Brown R, Seenivasan S, Adamson MM. Electrophysiological and behavioral effects of unilateral and bilateral rTMS; A randomized clinical trial on rumination and depression. J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:360-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.098. Epub 2022 Aug 30. PubMed 36055535 ↗
  • Godfrey KEM, Muthukumaraswamy SD, Stinear CM, Hoeh N. Decreased salience network fMRI functional connectivity following a course of rTMS for treatment-resistant depression. J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.129. Epub 2022 Jan 2. PubMed 34986371 ↗
  • Fernandez-Alvarez J, Grassi M, Colombo D, Botella C, Cipresso P, Perna G, Riva G. Efficacy of bio- and neurofeedback for depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;52(2):201-216. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004396. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34776024 ↗
  • Clancy KJ, Andrzejewski JA, Simon J, Ding M, Schmidt NB, Li W. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Is Associated with alpha Dysrhythmia across the Visual Cortex and the Default Mode Network. eNeuro. 2020 Jul 31;7(4):ENEURO.0053-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0053-20.2020. Print 2020 Jul/Aug. PubMed 32690671 ↗
  • Carpenter LL, Janicak PG, Aaronson ST, Boyadjis T, Brock DG, Cook IA, Dunner DL, Lanocha K, Solvason HB, Demitrack MA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for major depression: a multisite, naturalistic, observational study of acute treatment outcomes in clinical practice. Depress Anxiety. 2012 Jul;29(7):587-96. doi: 10.1002/da.21969. Epub 2012 Jun 11. PubMed 22689344 ↗
  • Bonnard M, Chen S, Gaychet J, Carrere M, Woodman M, Giusiano B, Jirsa V. Resting state brain dynamics and its transients: a combined TMS-EEG study. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 4;6:31220. doi: 10.1038/srep31220. PubMed 27488504 ↗
  • Batail JM, Xiao X, Azeez A, Tischler C, Kratter IH, Bishop JH, Saggar M, Williams NR. Network effects of Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT) in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: a randomized, controlled trial. Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 3;13(1):240. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02537-9. PubMed 37400432 ↗
  • Arns M, de Ridder S, Strehl U, Breteler M, Coenen A. Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: the effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009 Jul;40(3):180-9. doi: 10.1177/155005940904000311. PubMed 19715181 ↗
  • Alexander ML, Alagapan S, Lugo CE, Mellin JM, Lustenberger C, Rubinow DR, Frohlich F. Double-blind, randomized pilot clinical trial targeting alpha oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0439-0. PubMed 30837453 ↗
  • Wang B, Li M, Haihambo N, Qiu Z, Sun M, Guo M, Zhao X, Han C. Characterizing Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) using alpha-band activity in resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) combined with MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). J Affect Disord. 2024 Jun 15;355:254-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.145. Epub 2024 Mar 30. PubMed 38561155 ↗
  • Tozzi L, Bertrand C, Hack LM, Lyons T, Olmsted AM, Rajasekharan D, Chen T, Berlow YA, Yesavage JA, Lim K, Madore MR, Philip NS, Holtzheimer P, Williams LM. A cognitive neural circuit biotype of depression showing functional and behavioral improvement after transcranial magnetic stimulation in the B-SMART-fMRI trial. Nat Ment Health. 2024 Aug;2(8):987-998. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00271-9. Epub 2024 Jul 5. PubMed 39911692 ↗
  • Taylor SF, Ho SS, Abagis T, Angstadt M, Maixner DF, Welsh RC, Hernandez-Garcia L. Changes in brain connectivity during a sham-controlled, transcranial magnetic stimulation trial for depression. J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 21. PubMed 29494898 ↗
  • Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, Weiskopf N, Blefari ML, Rana M, Oblak E, Birbaumer N, Sulzer J. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):86-100. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164. Epub 2016 Dec 22. PubMed 28003656 ↗
  • Shaw SB, Nicholson AA, Ros T, Harricharan S, Terpou B, Densmore M, Theberge J, Frewen P, Lanius RA. Increased top-down control of emotions during symptom provocation working memory tasks following a RCT of alpha-down neurofeedback in PTSD. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;37:103313. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103313. Epub 2023 Jan 3. PubMed 36669352 ↗
  • Roelofs CL, Krepel N, Corlier J, Carpenter LL, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ, Tendolkar I, Wilson A, Downar J, Bailey NW, Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Leuchter AF, Arns M. Individual alpha frequency proximity associated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation outcome: An independent replication study from the ICON-DB consortium. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Feb;132(2):643-649. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Nov 10. PubMed 33243617 ↗
  • Ros T, Munneke MA, Ruge D, Gruzelier JH, Rothwell JC. Endogenous control of waking brain rhythms induces neuroplasticity in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Feb;31(4):770-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07100.x. PubMed 20384819 ↗
  • Ros T, Michela A, Bellman A, Vuadens P, Saj A, Vuilleumier P. Increased Alpha-Rhythm Dynamic Range Promotes Recovery from Visuospatial Neglect: A Neurofeedback Study. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:7407241. doi: 10.1155/2017/7407241. Epub 2017 Apr 25. PubMed 28529806 ↗
  • Riddle J, Alexander ML, Schiller CE, Rubinow DR, Frohlich F. Reduction in Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder Is Context Dependent in a Randomized Clinical Trial. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Mar;7(3):302-311. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 14. PubMed 34273556 ↗
  • Patil AU, Lin C, Lee SH, Huang HW, Wu SC, Madathil D, Huang CM. Review of EEG-based neurofeedback as a therapeutic intervention to treat depression. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2023 Mar;329:111591. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111591. Epub 2023 Jan 13. PubMed 36682174 ↗
  • Philip NS, Barredo J, van 't Wout-Frank M, Tyrka AR, Price LH, Carpenter LL. Network Mechanisms of Clinical Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;83(3):263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 8. PubMed 28886760 ↗
  • Liston C, Chen AC, Zebley BD, Drysdale AT, Gordon R, Leuchter B, Voss HU, Casey BJ, Etkin A, Dubin MJ. Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 1;76(7):517-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Feb 5. PubMed 24629537 ↗
  • O'Reardon JP, Solvason HB, Janicak PG, Sampson S, Isenberg KE, Nahas Z, McDonald WM, Avery D, Fitzgerald PB, Loo C, Demitrack MA, George MS, Sackeim HA. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 1;62(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Jun 14. PubMed 17573044 ↗
  • Lynch CJ, Elbau IG, Ng T, Ayaz A, Zhu S, Wolk D, Manfredi N, Johnson M, Chang M, Chou J, Summerville I, Ho C, Lueckel M, Bukhari H, Buchanan D, Victoria LW, Solomonov N, Goldwaser E, Moia S, Caballero-Gaudes C, Downar J, Vila-Rodriguez F, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM, Kay K, Aloysi A, Gordon EM, Bhati MT, Williams N, Power JD, Zebley B, Grosenick L, Gunning FM, Liston C. Frontostriatal salience network expansion in individuals in depression. Nature. 2024 Sep;633(8030):624-633. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07805-2. Epub 2024 Sep 4. PubMed 39232159 ↗
  • Zhou HX, Chen X, Shen YQ, Li L, Chen NX, Zhu ZC, Castellanos FX, Yan CG. Rumination and the default mode network: Meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116287. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116287. Epub 2019 Oct 23. PubMed 31655111 ↗
  • Tozzi L, Zhang X, Pines A, Olmsted AM, Zhai ES, Anene ET, Chesnut M, Holt-Gosselin B, Chang S, Stetz PC, Ramirez CA, Hack LM, Korgaonkar MS, Wintermark M, Gotlib IH, Ma J, Williams LM. Personalized brain circuit scores identify clinically distinct biotypes in depression and anxiety. Nat Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):2076-2087. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03057-9. Epub 2024 Jun 17. PubMed 38886626 ↗
  • Bertocci MA, Afriyie-Agyemang Y, Rozovsky R, Iyengar S, Stiffler R, Aslam HA, Bebko G, Phillips ML. Altered patterns of central executive, default mode and salience network activity and connectivity are associated with current and future depression risk in two independent young adult samples. Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;28(3):1046-1056. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01899-8. Epub 2022 Dec 8. PubMed 36481935 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07892287
Responsible party
Tracy Barbour (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Tracy Barbour, MD
Contact
tbarbour@mgh.harvard.edu
(617) 726-5340 ext. +1

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion