ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01501045Updated Mar 27, 2019

Effect of Transmagnetic Stimulation on Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

An interventional study of TMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark and TMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark in Headache and Migraine, sponsored by Rambam Health Care Campus. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-27.

Sponsored by Rambam Health Care Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2011, registered Dec 2011).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

While some indications of the neural circuits involved in the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) process are now available, there is still need to clarify what parts of the brain are essential for this process, whether the spino-brainstem loop is largely sufficient to explain CPM or whether other cerebral and spinal regions such as frontal, somatosensory and other cortical regions contribute substantially. Whereas mere observation of correlation between these circuits while activated by brain imaging is still of considerable interest, direct experimental manipulations by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could even establish insights into causal relationships.

Read the detailed description

rTMS of different intensities, frequencies and location will be applied during CPM to evaluate the central mechanisms of pain modulation, their location and role in pain reduction through enhancement or suppression of activity in the relevant brain regions. In other words, cortical regions that may be implicated in CPM will be determined by augmenting or interrupting their activity via rTMSapplied to the areas under investigation. The regions will be the pain network sites, which are assumed to control the top-down influence on CPM and are superficial enough to be stimulated by the magnetic coil. These include primarily DLPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and OFC (orbitofrontal cortex), with possible later addition of other relevant sites such as ACC (anterior cortex cinguli), insula and somatosensory cortices, etc. Since rTMS may be administered in a manner that either reduces or enhances the excitability of the stimulated cortical region, it should be possible to clarify the inhibitory or excitatory role of these regions in the CPM process. In summary, the planned studies should allow for identifying the cortical regions of the descending pain system, which are critical as starting points for the top-down modulation of CPM.

02

Conditions studied

  • Headache
  • Migraine

Keywords

  • TMS
  • CPM
  • headache
  • migraine
  • EEG
  • psychophysics
03

In context

Headache

1,235 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache; 201 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is above the median of 60 across 926 interventional studies indexed under Headache.

Browse Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Rambam Health Care Campus is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18-70
  • males and females
  • right handed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • metal in brain/skull
  • cardiac pacemaker
  • cohlear implants
  • history of head trauma
  • history of epilepsy or seizures
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    healthy subjects

    healthy subjects

    Device: TMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark

  • Experimental
    pain patients

    Migraine and muscle headache patients

    Device: TMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark

Interventions

  • DeviceTMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark

    repeated TMS (rTMS)

    Also known as: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

  • DeviceTMS system MagPro x100, Tonica Elektronik A/S, Denmark

    repeated TMS

    Also known as: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain scores as measured by pain numerical scale (NPS)

    TMS directed to pain inhibitory cortical areas will evoke pain reduction

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Amplitude of pain-evoked potentials

    Change in pain evoked potentials will be assessed before and after the TMS

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. conditioned pain modulation (CPM)

    Change in the efficiency of CPM will be assessed in response to TMS

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The lab of clinical neurophysiology, the faculty of medicine, Technion and Rambam Medical Center
    Haifa, Israel
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2011 to primary completion in Nov 2017, 82 months.

Of 314 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Headache, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30. This study's 82 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 335 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 12, 2011
First posted
Dec 29, 2011
StartActual
Jan 2011
Primary completionActual
Nov 6, 2017
CompletionActual
Nov 6, 2017
Last update
Mar 27, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01501045
Collaborators
German Research Foundation
Responsible party
d_yarnitsky (head of Neurology Department, Rambam Health Care Campus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 29, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2017
Completion
Nov 6, 2017
Last update
Mar 27, 2019

Study contacts

David Yarnitsky, professor
principal investigator · Rambam Health Care Campus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion