ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06235749Updated Jul 16, 2026

Administration Of Calcium Gluconate for The Reduction of Blood Loss During Elective Cesarean Delivery

An interventional study of Calcium Gluconate 10% and sodium chloride 0.9% in Elective Cesarean Delivery, sponsored by Rambam Health Care Campus. Recruiting at 4 sites in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-16.

Sponsored by Rambam Health Care Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of death related to pregnancy. PPH can lead to blood transfusion, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hysterectomy, or death. The prophylactic administration of uterotonic agents as part of an active management of the third stage of labor has been proven to reduce rates of PPH. However, even with these treatments, PPH rate is still relatively high, and puts women at risk of heavy bleeding and death.

Calcium is a key component in the coagulation cascade and known as factor IV. It has a role in platelet activation, and it is an important co-factor for the activation of factors II and There is a concentration-dependent effect of hypocalcemia on in vitro clot strength in patients at risk of bleeding. Calcium gluconate is the calcium salt of gluconic acid, and it has a relatively strong safety profile.

Hypocalcemia is a poor prognostic factor in actively bleeding patients. Calcium has a positive inotropic effect both on skeletal muscle and smooth muscle. The inotropic effect doesn't skip the myometrium, and it is well-established that hypocalcemia can impair myometrial contractility. As so, calcium channel blockers are prescribed as a tocolytic drug and calcium gluconate should be considered as adjuvant therapy for treating PPH duo to atony, in case of prolonged tocolytic or magnesium sulfate use prior to delivery. Studies have already shown an association between low ionized calcium levels and the risk for severe bleeding. In a pilot randomized controlled trial of patients with risk factors for uterine atony, calcium was shown to reduce uterine atony compared to placebo. However, current studies have small sample size and are limited to a high-risk population. There are no recommendations in current guidelines for monitoring calcium levels or prescribing calcium as a prophylactic measure for the third stage of labor, despite atony and coagulopathy being significant causes of PPH.

HYPOTHESIS: Administration of Calcium Gluconate at the third stage of elective Cesarean delivery will decrease the rates of blood loss during and after the surgery by reducing the rates of uterine atony and development of coagulopathy, thus has the potential of reducing the incidence of PPH and its complications without severe side effects.

Read the detailed description

After signing a consent form prior to the surgery (at the pre-operative assessment), At the third stage of labor, women who gave their consent to participate in the study will get either 10 ml of Calcium Gluconate 10% solution (containing 0.94 gr of calcium gluconate) diluted in 100 ml of normal saline IV or 110 ml of normal saline IV.

The solutions will be given in addition to Carbetocin (a long acting oxytocin analogue), in both arms. The invastigators will use calcium gluconate during even-numbered months and normal saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa, according to randomization that will be known to the primary researcher alone.

A blood sample will be drawn at the beginning of the surgery and sent for blood gas analysis, determining ionized calcium levels and coagulation profile. Women with hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia will be excluded from the trial. Only patients with normal calcium levels between 1.0-1.3 mmol/L will be included in this trial.

An ECG strip will be done prior to the surgery, making sure that the patient doesn't suffer from a QT segment abnormality. All patients will be monitored with a 3 lead- ECG prior, during, and 2 hours following calcium administration. Patients with QT interval abnormalities will be excluded from the trial. After the surgery, a blood sample will be drawn and sent to blood gas analysis (determining ionized calcium levels) and for coagulation profile. A complete blood count will be routinely taken for all women the next day. The hemoglobin level will be compared to the hemoglobin level prior to CD.

Decreased mean hemoglobin drop is the primary outcome. the secondary outcomes are described below.

After the primary analysis we will perform a subgroup analysis, determine whether women with high risk for PPH (such as overdistended uterus, abnormal placentation, myomatous uterus, grand multiparty, coagulation disorder, etc.) may benefit from the intervention more than the general population of all participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Elective Cesarean Delivery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Rambam Health Care Campus is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Elective Cesarean Delivery, at Gestational age of 35 weeks or more.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age younger than 18 years old.
  • Patients treated with calcium channel blockers.
  • Chronic renal failure and hyperphosphatemia.
  • Sarcoidosis.
  • Hypocalcemia (ionized Ca\<1 mmol/L) or hypercalcemia (ionized Ca> 1.3 mmol/L) before the surgery.
  • Any abnormalities as evident by before Calcium Gluconate administrations or any known conduction abnormality.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
1,180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    calcium gluconate

    Administration of Calcium Gluconate 10% IV following umbilical cord clamping.

    Drug: Calcium Gluconate 10%

  • Placebo comparator
    normal saline 0.9%

    Administration of normal saline 0.9% IV following umbilical cord clamping.

    Drug: sodium chloride 0.9%

Interventions

  • Administration of Calcium Gluconate 10% IV following umbilical cord clamping

  • Drugsodium chloride 0.9%

    Administration of sodium chloride 0.9% IV following umbilical cord clamping

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in mean hemoglobin drop

    Change in mean hemoglobin drop after cesarean delivery at the Calcium gluconate arm, compared to the control arm.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. The rate of women with a decrease of hemoglobin levels of 2 gr/dl or more

    The rate of women with a decrease of hemoglobin levels of 2 gr/dl or more.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the surgery

  2. additional therapy for the management of PPH

    additional therapy for the management of PPH

    Time frame: during hospitalization, an average of 4 days

  3. Receipt of blood products.

    Receipt of blood products.

    Time frame: during hospitalization, an average of 4 days

  4. treatment with intravenous ferrous (iron).

    treatment with intravenous ferrous (iron).

    Time frame: during hospitalization, an average of 4 days

  5. estimated blood loss during the surgery.

    estimated blood loss during the surgery.

    Time frame: during the surgery

  6. Hospitalization length of stay.

    Hospitalization length of stay.

    Time frame: an average of 4 days

  7. Duration of cesarean delivery

    Duration of cesarean delivery

    Time frame: during the surgery

  8. A composite of adverse maternal outcomes

    A composite of adverse maternal outcomes including at least one of the following: admission to intensive care unit (NICU), the need for a surgical treatment for uncontrolled PPH, massive blood transfusion (defined as transfusion of ≥10 units red blood cells (RBCs) in 24 hours, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and death.

    Time frame: during hospitalization, an average of 4 days

  9. Endometritis or antibiotic treatment following CD.

    Endometritis or antibiotic treatment following CD.

    Time frame: during hospitalization, an average of 4 days

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deneux-Tharaux C, Bonnet MP, Tort J. [Epidemiology of post-partum haemorrhage]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014 Dec;43(10):936-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Nov 6. French. PubMed 25447386 ↗
  • Palta S, Saroa R, Palta A. Overview of the coagulation system. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;58(5):515-23. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.144643. PubMed 25535411 ↗
  • Ho KM, Yip CB. Concentration-dependent effect of hypocalcaemia on in vitro clot strength in patients at risk of bleeding: a retrospective cohort study. Transfus Med. 2016 Feb;26(1):57-62. doi: 10.1111/tme.12272. Epub 2016 Jan 5. PubMed 26729371 ↗
  • Papandreou L, Chasiotis G, Seferiadis K, Thanasoulias NC, Dousias V, Tsanadis G, Stefos T. Calcium levels during the initiation of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Jul 15;115(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.032. PubMed 15223159 ↗
  • Korytny A, Klein A, Marcusohn E, Freund Y, Neuberger A, Raz A, Miller A, Epstein D. Hypocalcemia is associated with adverse clinical course in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;16(7):1813-1822. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02671-6. Epub 2021 Mar 2. PubMed 33651325 ↗
  • Epstein D, Freund Y, Marcusohn E, Diab T, Klein E, Raz A, Neuberger A, Miller A. Association Between Ionized Calcium Level and Neurological Outcome in Endovascularly Treated Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):723-737. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01214-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PubMed 33829378 ↗
  • Kawarabayashi T, Kishikawa T, Sugimori H. Effects of external calcium, magnesium, and temperature on spontaneous contractions of pregnant human myometrium. Biol Reprod. 1989 May;40(5):942-8. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod40.5.942. PubMed 2765618 ↗
  • Epstein D, Solomon N, Korytny A, Marcusohn E, Freund Y, Avrahami R, Neuberger A, Raz A, Miller A. Association between ionised calcium and severity of postpartum haemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1022-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 17. PubMed 33341222 ↗
  • Ansari JR, Kalariya N, Carvalho B, Flood P, Guo N, Riley E. Calcium chloride for the prevention of uterine atony during cesarean delivery: A pilot randomized controlled trial and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Sep;80:110796. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110796. Epub 2022 Apr 18. PubMed 35447502 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 54 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2023
First posted
Feb 1, 2024
StartActual
Nov 14, 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2028
Last update
Jul 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06235749
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2024
Start date
Nov 14, 2023
Primary completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2026

Study contacts

Gili Buchnik Fater, MD
Contact
gili.buchnik@gmail.com
+972-54-6738628

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Calcium Gluconate

Start the discussion