ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01193283Updated May 22, 2017Results posted

Cyclophosphamide Plus Cyclosporine in Treatment-Naive Severe Aplastic Anemia

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporine in Aplastic Anemia, Neutropenia and Pancytopenia, sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-22.

Sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) can lead to problems with bone marrow health and result in low blood cell counts, which require frequent transfusions. Standard treatment for SAA involves injections of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporine (CsA). This regimen has been shown to improve the blood counts in about two-thirds of patients. However, the ATG/CsA regimen has the following limitations: (a) the disease can come back (relapse) in about one-third of patients who improve initially; and (b) in about 10% to 15% of cases, certain types of bone marrow cancer (such as myelodysplasia and leukemia) can develop (called evolution). Experience with other drugs in SAA such as cyclophosphamide suggests that similar response rates to ATG/CsA can be achieved with a lower risk of relapse and clonal evolution. However, cyclophosphamide was found to have significant side effects in SAA when investigated over 10 years ago due to increase risk of fungal infections.
  • Better antibiotic drugs against fungus have been developed and are widely used to treat patients who have low white blood cell counts and are at risk of developing infections. In SAA patients in particular, these newer antibiotics have had a large impact in preventing and treating fungus infections. Researchers are revisiting the use of cyclophosphamide in SAA treatment, and plan to give a lower dose of CsA in combination with the immune-suppressing drug cyclophosphamide, as well as antibiotics to protect against infections, as a possible treatment for the disease.

Objectives:

  • To determine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine in treating severe aplastic anemia that has not been treated with immunosuppressive therapy.
Read the detailed description

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disorder characterized by pancytopenia and a hypocellular bone marrow. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the opportunity for cure in 70 percent of patients, but most patients are not suitable candidates for this treatment modality due to advanced age, comorbidities or lack of a histocompatible donor. For these patients, comparable long-term survival is attainable with immunosuppressive treatment (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA). However, approximately 1/3 of patients do not show blood count improvement after ATG/CsA and are considered to have refractory disease. Furthermore, analysis of our own extensive clinical data suggests that poor blood count responses to a single course of ATG (non-robust responders), even when transfusion-independence is achieved, predicts a markedly worse prognosis compared to those who achieve a robust hematologic improvement (protocol 90-H-0146).

The current limitations of IST in SAA are: 1) the majority of the responses observed following initial h-ATG/CsA are partial with only a few patients achieving normal blood counts; 2) 1/3 of patients are refractory to initial h-ATG/CsA; 3) hematologic relapses occur in 35 percent of responders following initial response to h-ATG/CsA; 4) among relapsed patients chronic use of CsA is not infrequent which often leads to toxicities from the long term exposure to this drug (especially in older patients); 5) and clonal evolution is still observed in 10-15 percent of patients. Efforts to improve initial IST in treatment-naive patients with the addition of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus to standard h-ATG/CsA or use of lymphocytotoxic agents such as r-ATG/CsA or alemtuzumab have not yielded the expected better outcomes when compared to standard h-ATG/CsA (protocols 00-H-0032, 03-H-0193, and 06-H-0034). Because the majority of SAA patients in the US and worldwide are treated with IST due to lack of an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor or inaccessibility to transplant, novel regimens are needed to overcome the current limitations of IST in SAA. Towards the goal of addressing these limitations we are proposing a regimen of cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus low dose CsA.

Cy has been proposed by the investigators at Johns Hopkins as an alternative IST regimen to h-ATG/CsA. In a pilot study, high dose Cy (200 mg/kg) yielded similar results to that observed for h-ATG/CsA. In a randomized study, at National Institute of Heart, Lung, and BIood (NHLBI), comparing high dose Cy (200 mg/kg) and h-ATG/CsA in treatment-na(SqrRoot) ve patients (protocol 97-H-0117), excess toxicity and deaths from invasive fungal infections were observed in the Cy arm which led to the discontinuation of this regimen. Recently reported long-term results from Johns Hopkins of 44 treatment-naive patients who received high dose Cy (200 mg/kg) as sole therapy for SAA showed that a greater number of complete responses were observed with few instances of relapse and clonal evolution noted with Cy when compared to h-ATG/CsA (historical comparison). In an accompanying editorial, the incidence of invasive fungal infections in this cohort were highlighted. Of note, antifungal prophylaxis against Aspergillus sp, the deadliest culprit when neutropenia is severe and prolonged, was not employed in the Hopkins high dose Cy protocol. In the Chinese experience, data presented in a recent meeting in Japan showed that lower doses of Cy (120 mg/kg) plus CsA achieved similar results reported by the Hopkins investigators with reduced toxicity. These data suggest that Cy has activity in SAA and could be a viable alternative to standard h-ATG/CsA if the immediate toxicities associated to prolonged neutropenia could be overcome.

In recent years we have observed a marked improvement in survival in our SAA patients especially among those who are non-responders to IST where pancytopenia remain persistent for months. A detailed analysis (shown in Section 2.4 Scientific and Clinical Justification of Protocol) showed that better antifungal supportive care in recent years contributed to a reduction of infection-related mortality in the months following IST among non-responders, who remain persistently neutropenic. This observation suggests that nowadays patients can be better supported through periods of neutropenia due to improved antifungal supportive care with agents that are better tolerated (compared to deoxycholate amphotericin B), retain a broad-spectrum of activity (especially against Aspergillus sp), and can be administered orally as an outpatient.

The fact that about one-third of initial refractory patients respond to retreatment and that late complications (relapse and clonal evolution) occur in about 40-50 percent of cases suggest that initial IST with h-ATG/CsA has important limitations. Therefore, we propose to investigate Cy + CsA as initial therapy in SAA. Our intention is not to recapitulate the high dose Cy regimen initially proposed by Hopkins (200 mg/kg) but instead, investigate lower doses proposed by the Chinese (120 mg/kg) in addition to low dose CsA (target therapeutic level 100 200 microg/L). The ability to better support patients during periods of neutropenia with better antifungals should allow for the immediate toxicity to be overcome and assess the activity of Cy in SAA.

The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Cy 120 mg/kg + low dose CsA (100 200 microg/L) in treatment-naive SAA. The primary endpoint will be hematologic response, defined as no longer meeting criteria for SAA, at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are relapse, robustness of hematologic recovery at 6 months, response at 3 months and 12 months, survival, clonal evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplasia and acute leukemia. The primary endpoint will be changes in absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, and reticulocyte count at 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include time to relapse, changes in cytogenetics, and time to death.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aplastic Anemia
  • Neutropenia
  • Pancytopenia
  • Severe Aplastic Anemia

Keywords

  • Aplastic Anemia
  • Immunosuppression
  • T-Cells
  • Hematopoiesis
  • Autoimmunity
  • Severe Aplastic Anemia
03

In context

Anemia, Aplastic

371 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Aplastic; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 37 across 281 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Aplastic.

Browse Anemia, Aplastic studies →

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is the lead sponsor of 1,143 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 58 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 51 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Severe aplastic anemia characterized by:

Bone marrow cellularity less than 30 percent (excluding lymphocytes)

AND

At least two of the following:

less than 500/ microL

count less than 20,000/ microL

Absolute reticulocyte count less than 60,000/ microL

Age greater than or equal to 2 years old

Weight greater than or equal to 12 kg

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia

Cardiac less than 30 percent (evaluated by ECHO)

Evidence of a clonal hematologic bone marrow disorder on cytogenetics. Patients with the presence of trisomy 8, loss of Y or del(20q) will not be excluded in the absence of dysplastic changes in the marrow. Patients with very severe neutropenia (ANC less than 200 /microL) will not be excluded initially if cytogenetics are not available or pending. If evidence of a clonal disorder is later identified, the patient will go off study.

Prior therapy with high dose Cy or ATG

Infection not adequately controlled with appropriate therapy

Serologic evidence of infection

Moribund status or concurrent hepatic, renal, cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, infectious, or metabolic disease of such severity that it would preclude the patient s ability to tolerate protocol therapy, or that death within 30 days is likely

Subjects with cancer who are not considered cured, are on active chemotherapeutic treatment or who take drugs with hematological effects

Current pregnancy or unwillingness to take oral or refrain from pregnancy if of

Not able to understand the nature of the study or to give .

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SAA hematologic response

    Treatment-naive severe aplastic anemia patients will receive a low dose of cyclophosphamide (120mg/kg) and low dose cyclosporine ( target therapeutic level of 100-200 micrograms per liter). Cyclophosphamide will be given once daily for 4 doses. Cyclosporine will be started after cyclophosphamide completion, cyclosporine will be given twice daily. The dosing will be modified to attain the therapeutic level.

    Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Cyclosporine

Interventions

  • 30 my/kg for 4 days

    Also known as: Cytoxan

  • daily to a trough of 100 t0 200 ng/ml

    Also known as: Gengraf, Neoral, Sandimmune

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Counts and Adverse Event Profile After 6 Months of Treatment.

    The safety endpoint will be toxicity profile after 6 months of treatment. The efficacy endpoint is complete response rate at 6 months, with complete response defined as blood counts no longer meeting the standard criteria for severe pancytopenia in severe aplastic anemia.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 11, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSAA Hematologic Response
Started22
Completed21
Not completed1
Withdrew: Death1

Outcome measures

PrimaryBlood Counts and Adverse Event Profile After 6 Months of Treatment.

The safety endpoint will be toxicity profile after 6 months of treatment. The efficacy endpoint is complete response rate at 6 months, with complete response defined as blood counts no longer meeting the standard criteria for severe pancytopenia in severe aplastic anemia.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Blood Counts and Adverse Event Profile After 6 Months of Treatment.
participantsSAA Hematologic Response
Complete response4
Partial Response5
No Response12

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SAA Hematologic Response—16/22 (72.7%)0/22 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventSAA Hematologic Response
Febril neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/22
PnuemoniaInfections and infestations7/22
Bacterial infectionInfections and infestations6/22
blood infectionInfections and infestations5/22
Catheter-related infectionInfections and infestations4/22
Fungal infectionImmune system disorders3/22
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/22
Lung abscessRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/22
CholelithiasisGastrointestinal disorders1/22
GastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders1/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)SAA Hematologic Response
<=18 years4
Between 18 and 65 years16
>=65 years2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SAA Hematologic Response
Female7
Male15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SAA Hematologic Response
Hispanic or Latino8
Not Hispanic or Latino14
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)SAA Hematologic Response
United States22
08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rosenfeld S, Follmann D, Nunez O, Young NS. Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine for severe aplastic anemia: association between hematologic response and long-term outcome. JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1130-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1130. PubMed 12622583 ↗
  • Young NS, Calado RT, Scheinberg P. Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia. Blood. 2006 Oct 15;108(8):2509-19. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010777. Epub 2006 Jun 15. PubMed 16778145 ↗
  • Scheinberg P, Nunez O, Wu C, Young NS. Treatment of severe aplastic anaemia with combined immunosuppression: anti-thymocyte globulin, ciclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil. Br J Haematol. 2006 Jun;133(6):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06085.x. PubMed 16704434 ↗
  • Zaimoku Y, Patel BA, Adams SD, Shalhoub R, Groarke EM, Lee AAC, Kajigaya S, Feng X, Rios OJ, Eager H, Alemu L, Quinones Raffo D, Wu CO, Flegel WA, Young NS. HLA associations, somatic loss of HLA expression, and clinical outcomes in immune aplastic anemia. Blood. 2021 Dec 30;138(26):2799-2809. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012895. PubMed 34724566 ↗
  • Scheinberg P, Townsley D, Dumitriu B, Scheinberg P, Weinstein B, Daphtary M, Rios O, Wu CO, Young NS. Moderate-dose cyclophosphamide for severe aplastic anemia has significant toxicity and does not prevent relapse and clonal evolution. Blood. 2014 Oct 30;124(18):2820-3. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-573642. Epub 2014 Sep 3. PubMed 25185712 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01193283
Responsible party
Danielle Townsley, M.D. (Hematology Clinician, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Sep 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Results posted
Nov 11, 2015
Last update
May 22, 2017

Study contacts

Danielle M Townsley, M.D.
principal investigator · National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Cyclophosphamide · Cyclosporine

Start the discussion