ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01029353NESTUpdated Jul 18, 2024Results posted

Laparotomy vs. Drainage for Infants With Necrotizing Enterocolitis

An interventional study of Laparotomy and Drainage in Infant, Newborn, Infant, Low Birth Weight and Infant, Small for Gestational Age, sponsored by NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Completed at 22 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 8 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-18.

Sponsored by NICHD Neonatal Research Network · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
529
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 8 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of two surgical procedures -laparotomy versus drainage - commonly used to treat necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or isolated intestinal perforations (IP) in extremely low birth weight infants (≤1,000 g). Infants diagnosed with NEC or IP requiring surgical intervention, will be recruited. Subjects will be randomized to receive either a laparotomy or peritoneal drainage. Primary outcome is impairment-free survival at 18-22 months corrected age.

Read the detailed description

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a condition, generally affecting premature infants, in which the intestines become ischemic (lack oxygen and/or blood flow). NEC occurs in up to 5-15% of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Isolated or focal intestinal perforation (IP) is a less common condition, affecting an estimated 4% of ELBWs, in which a hole develops in the intestines leaking fluid into the abdominal cavity. Outcome for infants with NEC and/or IP is poor: 49% die and half of the surviving infants are neurodevelopmentally impaired.

Surgical options for NEC and IP include two possible procedures: peritoneal drainage, in which a tube is placed in the abdominal cavity through a small incision for fluid to drain out; or laparotomy, in which an incision is made in the abdomen and necrotic intestine is removed. Drainage may be followed by a laparotomy.

The Neonatal Research Network's observational study of 156 ELBW infants with NEC or IP (Pediatrics. 2006 Apr; 117(4): e680-7) showed comparable outcomes for the two procedures before hospital discharge, but suggested an advantage of laparotomy over drainage at 18-22 months corrected age with lower rates of death or neurodevelopmental impairment. However, the infants that underwent laparotomy were more mature; infants with drains were smaller and more premature. We hypothesize that initial laparotomy may improve an infant's long-term neurodevelopmental outcome, potentially by reducing the maximum severity or duration of inflammation.

This study included a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of laparotomy versus drainage for treating NEC or IP in extremely low birth weight infants. Target enrollment is 300 infants diagnosed with NEC or IP for randomization to receive initially either a laparotomy or drainage. Subsequent laparotomies may be performed on infants in either group, if their condition continues to deteriorate. Surviving infants will return for a follow-up assessment at 18-22 months corrected age.

This study also attempted to use a comprehensive cohort design that would have added additional information beyond the conventional randomized trial component. The cohort component included trial data among eligible, non-randomized infants with NEC/IP, who consented for the non-randomized cohort, would be collected and analyzed as a secondary specific aim. This additional cohort was called the preference cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Low Birth Weight
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age
  • Infant, Premature
  • Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
  • Intestinal Perforation

Keywords

  • NICHD Neonatal Research Network
  • Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW)
  • Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW)
  • Prematurity
  • Laparotomy
  • Drainage
  • Isolated intestinal perforation
  • Focal intestinal perforation
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 529 is above the median of 84 across 1,666 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

NICHD Neonatal Research Network is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 8 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants born at ≤1,000 g birth weight
  • Infant is ≤8 0/7 weeks of age at the time of eligibility assessment
  • Pediatric surgeon decision to perform surgery for suspected NEC or IP
  • Subject is at a center able to perform both laparotomy and drainage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major anomaly that influences likelihood of developing primary outcome or affects surgical treatment considerations
  • Congenital infection
  • Prior laparotomy or peritoneal drain placement
  • Prior NEC or IP
  • Infant for whom full support is not being provided
  • Follow-up unlikely
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
529 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Randomized Trial: Laparotomy

    Under general anesthesia in the NICU or operating room, a laparotomy will be performed following standard procedures.

    Procedure: Laparotomy

  • Active comparator
    Randomized Trial: Peritoneal drain placement

    Place a one-fourth inch Penrose drain in the lower abdomen with local anesthesia and sedation.

    Procedure: Drainage

  • Active comparator
    Preference Cohort: Laparotomy

    Under general anesthesia in the NICU or operating room, a laparotomy will be performed following standard procedures.

    Procedure: Laparotomy

  • Active comparator
    Preference Cohort: Peritoneal drain placement

    Place a one-fourth inch Penrose drain in the lower abdomen with local anesthesia and sedation.

    Procedure: Drainage

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparotomy

    Initial laparotomy will be performed. Standard procedures will be used, including inspection of the bowel with removal of diseased areas, creation of stoma(s), and other procedures deemed indicated by the surgeon.

  • ProcedureDrainage

    Initial drainage will involve placing a Penrose drain in the abdomen.

    Also known as: Peritoneal drain

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Death or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)

    Death or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age

    Time frame: at 18-22 months corrected age

Secondary outcomes

  1. Death

    Death by 18-22 months corrected age

    Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

  2. Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)

    NDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors)

    Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

  3. Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  4. Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  5. Death or Blindness

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  6. Death or Hearing Loss

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  7. Subsequent Laparotomy

    Subsequent laparotomy after initial surgery

    Time frame: between initial surgery and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  8. Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery

    Any intraoperative complications during any surgery

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  9. Any Wound Dehiscence

    Any wound dehiscence during any surgery

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  10. Any Intra-abdominal Abscess

    Any intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  11. Any Intestinal Stricture

    Any intestinal stricture during any surgery

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  12. Any Late Onset Sepsis

    Any late onset sepsis after randomization

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  13. Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis

    Any Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  14. Any Severe IVH

    Any severe IVH ater randomization

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  15. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Duration of mechanical ventilation while on study

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  16. Duration of Parenteral Nutrition

    Duration of parenteral nutrition while on study

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  17. Final Bowel Length

    Final bowel length after last surgery

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  18. Time to Full Feeds

    Time to full feeds while on study

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  19. Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of hospital stay while on study

    Time frame: from randomization up to 1 year following birth

  20. Death or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Death or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: at 18-22 months corrected age

  21. Death Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

  22. Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    NDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors). Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

  23. Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  24. Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP). Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  25. Death or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  26. Death or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Death within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

  27. Subsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Subsequent laparotomy after initial surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  28. Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any intraoperative complications during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  29. Any Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any wound dehiscence during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  30. Any Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  31. Any Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any intestinal stricture during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  32. Any Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any late onset sepsis after randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  33. Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  34. Any Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Any severe IVH ater randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  35. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Duration of mechanical ventilation while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  36. Duration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Duration of parenteral nutrition while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  37. Final Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Final bowel length after last surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  38. Time to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Time to full feeds while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

  39. Length of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

    Length of hospital stay while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

    Time frame: from randomization up to 1 year following birth

07

Results

Posted Nov 23, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Started148162100119
Included in itt analysis146162100119
Reached network status146162100119
Completed14115493115
Not completed7874
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4554
Withdrew: Consent withdrawn2000
Withdrew: Primary outcome indeterminate1320

Outcome measures

PrimaryDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)

Death or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame:
at 18-22 months corrected age
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No44462728
Yes971086687
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Robust Poisson regression · p = 0.03 (Pre-specified threshold = 0.05)
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
  • Preference Cohort: Laparotomy vs Preference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.97 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.26RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariate.
SecondaryDeath

Death by 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame:
by 18-22 months corrected age
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No105114
Yes4148
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.69 to 1.45RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondarySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)

NDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors)

Time frame:
by 18-22 months corrected age
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No4446
Yes5660
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.02 · 95% CI 0.78 to 1.34RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No8478
Yes5879
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.06RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No4651
Yes95100
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Blindness

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Blindness
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No101105
Yes4152
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.64 to 1.31RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Hearing Loss

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Hearing Loss
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No98105
Yes4351
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.97 · 95% CI 0.69 to 1.36RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondarySubsequent Laparotomy

Subsequent laparotomy after initial surgery

Time frame:
between initial surgery and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subsequent Laparotomy
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No11081
Yes3581
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.47 · 95% CI 0.35 to 0.63RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery

Any intraoperative complications during any surgery

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No116141
Yes2921
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.57 · 95% CI 1.04 to 2.36RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Wound Dehiscence

Any wound dehiscence during any surgery

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Wound Dehiscence
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No135154
Yes118
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.58 · 95% CI 0.71 to 3.50RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Intra-abdominal Abscess

Any intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Intra-abdominal Abscess
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No141158
Yes54
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Intestinal Stricture

Any intestinal stricture during any surgery

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Intestinal Stricture
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No139153
Yes79
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.34 to 2.20RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Late Onset Sepsis

Any late onset sepsis after randomization

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Late Onset Sepsis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No123126
Yes2334
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.73 · 95% CI 0.37 to 1.42RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis

Any Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No110116
Yes3646
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.15RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryAny Severe IVH

Any severe IVH ater randomization

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Severe IVH
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
No122132
Yes1825
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.77 · 95% CI 0.44 to 1.36RR: Initial Laparotomy over Peritoneal Drain. RR from robust Poisson regression with log link, reference cell coding, center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDuration of Mechanical Ventilation

Duration of mechanical ventilation while on study

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation33.3 ± 25.638.9 ± 26.7
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -6.01 · 95% CI -12.77 to 0.75Mean Difference (MD): Laparotomy minus Drain. MD from mixed model using PROC MIXED in SAS, center as random effect, and reference cell coding. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDuration of Parenteral Nutrition

Duration of parenteral nutrition while on study

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Parenteral Nutrition
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Duration of Parenteral Nutrition55.5 ± 34.164.1 ± 36.4
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -8.75 · 95% CI -17.05 to -0.46Mean Difference (MD): Laparotomy minus Drain. MD from mixed model using PROC MIXED in SAS, center as random effect, and reference cell coding. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryFinal Bowel Length

Final bowel length after last surgery

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Final Bowel Length
cmRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Final Bowel Length74.4 ± 24.668.7 ± 35.7
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): 6.59 · 95% CI -9.09 to 22.27Mean Difference (MD): Laparotomy minus Drain. MD from mixed model using PROC MIXED in SAS, center as random effect, and reference cell coding. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryTime to Full Feeds

Time to full feeds while on study

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to Full Feeds
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Time to Full Feeds46.9 ± 45.850.6 ± 27.7
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -2.56 · 95% CI -13.02 to 7.91Mean Difference (MD): Laparotomy minus Drain. MD from mixed model using PROC MIXED in SAS, center as random effect, and reference cell coding. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay

Length of hospital stay while on study

Time frame:
from randomization up to 1 year following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Length of Hospital Stay101.2 ± 71.2113.8 ± 73.8
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -13.95 · 95% CI -30.54 to 2.63Mean Difference (MD): Laparotomy minus Drain. MD from mixed model using PROC MIXED in SAS, center as random effect, and reference cell coding. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP) as covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
at 18-22 months corrected age
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No3138
IP — Yes6864
NEC — No138
NEC — Yes2944
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.64 to 1.04The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.31The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
by 18-22 months corrected age
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No8088
IP — Yes2421
NEC — No2526
NEC — Yes1727
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.77 · 95% CI 0.52 to 1.13The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.28 · 95% CI 0.79 to 2.06The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondarySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

NDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors). Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
by 18-22 months corrected age
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No3138
IP — Yes4443
NEC — No138
NEC — Yes1217
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.73 · 95% CI 0.42 to 1.27The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.45The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No6464
IP — Yes3641
NEC — No2014
NEC — Yes2238
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.70 · 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.95 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.19The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP). Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No3242
IP — Yes6759
NEC — No149
NEC — Yes2841
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.06The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.17 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.37The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No7683
IP — Yes2422
NEC — No2522
NEC — Yes1730
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.68 · 95% CI 0.46 to 1.01The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.74 to 2.01The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondaryDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Death or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No7381
IP — Yes2623
NEC — No2524
NEC — Yes1728
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.73 · 95% CI 0.51 to 1.04The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.25 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.93The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to infants with IP.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain ·
SecondarySubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Subsequent laparotomy after initial surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No8158
IP — Yes2351
NEC — No2923
NEC — Yes1230
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.53 · 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.44 · 95% CI 0.29 to 0.66The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any intraoperative complications during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No8395
IP — Yes2114
NEC — No3346
NEC — Yes87
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.44 · 95% CI 0.58 to 3.57The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.63 · 95% CI 1.06 to 2.50The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any wound dehiscence during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No99104
IP — Yes55
NEC — No3650
NEC — Yes63
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 2.52 · 95% CI 0.84 to 7.55The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.38 to 2.88The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No101106
IP — Yes33
NEC — No4052
NEC — Yes21
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.78 · 95% CI 0.82 to 3.86The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.42 to 3.20The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any intestinal stricture during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No101103
IP — Yes36
NEC — No3850
NEC — Yes43
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.68 · 95% CI 0.35 to 8.05The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.50 · 95% CI 0.10 to 2.44The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any late onset sepsis after randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No8880
IP — Yes1627
NEC — No3546
NEC — Yes77
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 1.29 · 95% CI 0.62 to 2.69The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.60 · 95% CI 0.27 to 1.32The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No7982
IP — Yes2527
NEC — No3134
NEC — Yes1119
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.75 · 95% CI 0.41 to 1.36The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.99 · 95% CI 0.69 to 1.42The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any severe IVH ater randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Any Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
ParticipantsRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP — No8484
IP — Yes1722
NEC — No3848
NEC — Yes13
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.43 · 95% CI 0.04 to 4.45The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Risk ratio (rr): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.44 to 1.49The model was fit using PROC GENMOD in SAS, using center as the repeated effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryDuration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Duration of mechanical ventilation while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP34.1 ± 26.642.2 ± 28
NEC31 ± 22.631.7 ± 22.5
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -1.27 · 95% CI -14.10 to 11.60The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -7.85 · 95% CI -15.84 to 0.13The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryDuration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Duration of parenteral nutrition while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP56.3 ± 35.263.6 ± 33.7
NEC53.5 ± 31.365.3 ± 42
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -11.57 · 95% CI -27.15 to 4.01The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -7.63 · 95% CI -17.46 to 2.20The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryFinal Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Final bowel length after last surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Final Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
cmRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP83.1 ± 20.974.7 ± 22.4
NEC62.7 ± 2564 ± 44.2
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): 4.00 · 95% CI -18.84 to 26.83The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): 9.05 · 95% CI -13.29 to 31.38The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
SecondaryTime to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Time to full feeds while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP52.4 ± 50.456.3 ± 27.1
NEC29.6 ± 18.932.3 ± 21.3
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -3.13 · 95% CI -24.62 to 18.36The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -2.39 · 95% CI -14.42 to 9.63The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to infants with IP.
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Length of hospital stay while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame:
from randomization up to 1 year following birth
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis
daysRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
IP109.6 ± 67121.3 ± 64.7
NEC80.2 ± 77.899.2 ± 87.7
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -18.43 · 95% CI -48.41 to 11.55The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.
  • Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy vs Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain · Mean difference (final values): -11.95 · 95% CI -31.96 to 8.06The model was fit using PROC MIXED in SAS, using center as the random effect. Effect coding was used to represent the binary covariates.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events are monitored from randomization through study status (death, discharge or 120 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0.00% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy41/146 (28.1%)41/146 (28.1%)0/146 (0%)
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain48/162 (29.6%)49/162 (30.2%)0/162 (0%)
Preference Cohort: Initial Laparotomy48/100 (48%)49/100 (49%)0/100 (0%)
Preference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain60/119 (50.4%)60/119 (50.4%)0/119 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent serious events
EventRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Necrotizing enterocolitis neonatalGastrointestinal disorders21/14624/16235/10025/119
Neonatal sepsisInfections and infestations10/14616/16213/1009/119
Neonatal spontaneous intestinal perforationGastrointestinal disorders3/1460/1622/1009/119
DeathGeneral disorders4/14611/1626/1008/119
Neonatal respiratory distress syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/1461/1620/1007/119
Neonatal infectionInfections and infestations1/1462/1620/1007/119
Intracranial hemorrhageNervous system disorders4/1461/1620/1003/119
PrematurityPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions3/1461/1620/1002/119
Bronchopulmonary dysplasiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1462/1621/1002/119
Cardiopulmonary failureCardiac disorders0/1461/1620/1002/119

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(days)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Mean11.6 ± 1012.1 ± 9.979.9 ± 125.449.9 ± 111.733.3 ± 81.0
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Female66634853230
Male80985266296
Missing01001
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Black62673142202
Missing551112
Other689629
White73825970284
Maternal hispanic ethnicity
Maternal hispanic ethnicity(Participants)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Missing193922
No1071207595397
Yes38332215108
Infant gestational age
Infant gestational age(weeks)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Mean25 ± 1.724.9 ± 1.724.6 ± 1.124.5 ± 1.225 ± 1.7
Infant birth weight
Infant birth weight(gram)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Mean721.2 ± 138.4711.4 ± 135.9719.8 ± 150.5675.6 ± 161.7707.6 ± 146.2
Infant was small for gestational age
Infant was small for gestational age(Participants)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
Missing01001
No1311458498458
Yes1516162168
Inborn status
Inborn status(Participants)Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainTotal
In born82906575312
Out born64723544215

27 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

22 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • University of California - Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • Stanford University
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • Yale University
    New Haven, Connecticut 06504, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • Indiana University
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Wayne State University
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Children's Mercy Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • University of New Mexico
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
  • University of Rochester
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • RTI International
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
  • Case Western Reserve University
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Univeristy of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
    Providence, Rhode Island 02905, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01029353
Lead sponsor
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 10, 2009
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2019
Completion
Aug 2019
Results posted
Nov 23, 2021
Last update
Jul 18, 2024

Study contacts

Abbot R. Laptook, MD
principal investigator · Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Michele C. Walsh, MD MS
principal investigator · Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital
C. Michael Cotten, MD
principal investigator · Duke University
David Carlton, MD
principal investigator · Emory University
Greg Sokol, MD
principal investigator · Indiana University
Abhik Das, PhD
principal investigator · RTI International
Krisa P. Van Meurs, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University
Ivan D. Frantz III, MD
principal investigator · Tufts Medical Center
Brenda Poindexter, MD, MS
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Waldemar A. Carlo, MD
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham
Edward F. Bell, MD
principal investigator · University of Iowa
Kristi L. Watterberg, MD
principal investigator · University of New Mexico
Myra Wyckoff, MD
principal investigator · University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Kathleen A. Kennedy, MD MPH
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Seetha Shankaran, MD
principal investigator · Wayne State University
Richard A. Ehrenkranz, MD
principal investigator · Yale University
Martin K. Blakely, MD
study director · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
William Truog, MD
principal investigator · Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Barbara Schmidt, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Univeristy of Pennsylvania
Carl D'Angio, MD
principal investigator · University of Rochester
Uday Devaskar, MD
principal investigator · University of Carlifornia - Los Angeles
Leif Nelin, MD
principal investigator · Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
Brad Yoder, MD
principal investigator · University of Utah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion