ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01024907Updated Dec 10, 2020

Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Low Grade Gliomas

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of proton beam radiation therapy and quality-of-life assessment in Adult Brain Tumor, Adult Brain Stem Glioma and Adult Diffuse Astrocytoma, sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-10.

Primary conditionPinealomaRegistry: Brain NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Brain Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pinealoma
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Pinealoma, a narrower term within Brain Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy, such as proton beam radiation therapy, that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the best way to give proton beam radiation therapy and to see how well it works in treating patients with low grade gliomas.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate the feasibility of proton beam radiation therapy in patients with low grade gliomas. (Phase I)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess late complications from irradiation using proton beam therapy in place of conventional photon beam therapy for the treatment of low grade gliomas. (Phase II) II. To assess acute side effects from irradiation using proton beam therapy in place of conventional photon beam therapy for the treatment of low grade gliomas. (Phase II) III. To compare the dose distribution to tumor and surrounding normal structures using DVH's (Dose Volume Histograms) generated from the proton plan used to treat the patient and the photon plan generated for comparison purposes. (Phase II) IV. To monitor the rates of local control, overall and disease specific survival using proton radiotherapy. (Phase II) V. To evaluate the time to progression of low grade gliomas treated with protons. (Phase II) VI. To evaluate the incidence and severity of fatigue in low grade glioma treated with protons. (Phase II) VII. To evaluate the effect of proton beam radiation on neurocognitive outcome in patients with low grade glioma. (Phase II) VIII. To evaluate the quality of life in patients treated for low grade glioma. (Phase II)

OUTLINE: Patients undergo proton beam radiation therapy for 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adult Brain Tumor
  • Adult Brain Stem Glioma
  • Adult Diffuse Astrocytoma
  • Adult Ependymoma
  • Adult Grade II Meningioma
  • Adult Melanocytic Lesion
  • Adult Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma
  • Adult Mixed Glioma
  • Adult Oligodendroglioma
  • Adult Pineal Gland Astrocytoma
  • Adult Pineocytoma
  • Recurrent Adult Brain Tumor
03

In context

Pinealoma Reclassified

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Pinealoma; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 26 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Pinealoma.

Browse Pinealoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine is the lead sponsor of 460 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (42%) have results posted.

Compared within Pinealoma, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Brain Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of low grade glioma of the CNS
  • Patients with WHO grade II; may be symptomatic; including patients who are being followed and have radiographic expression
  • Patients must have a Performance Status of >= 60
  • Patients must be able to provide
  • Patients must have adequate bone marrow function:

    1. WBC >= 4000/mm\^3
    2. >= 100,000 mm\^3
  • Women of as long as she agrees to use a recognized method of (e.g. oral contraceptive, IUD, condoms or other barrier methods etc); Hysterectomy or menopause must be clinically documented

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion

  • Patients who have had prior or simultaneous within the past two years (other than cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, melanoma in situ or thyroid carcinoma)
  • Patients with the following histologies:

gliomatosis cerebrei, WHO III or IV gliomas

  • Patients who have had any prior Radiation treatment
  • Patients who have had any chemotherapy administered within 30 days of the planned radiation treatment start date
  • Pregnant women, women planning to become pregnant and women that are nursing
  • Patients who are actively being treated on any other therapeutic research study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I

    Patients undergo proton beam radiation therapy for 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Radiation: proton beam radiation therapy · Procedure: quality-of-life assessment · Other: questionnaire administration

Interventions

  • Radiationproton beam radiation therapy

    Undergo radiation

  • Procedurequality-of-life assessment

    Ancillary study

  • Otherquestionnaire administration

    Ancillary study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility (phase I)

  2. Acute toxicity as assessed by NCI CTC version 3.0 (phases I and II)

    Time frame: 60 days (phase I) or 90 days (phase II) from completion of radiation therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Late toxicity as graded according to the RTOG/EORTC late morbidity scoring system (phases I and II)

  2. Fatigue as assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (phases I and II)

    Time frame: Pre-radiation, mid-treatment, and post-radiation; at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiation; and then every 6 months

  3. Cumulative total dose to normal brain tissue (phase II)

  4. Progression-free survival (phases I and II)

  5. Overall survival (phases I and II)

  6. Adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE version 3.0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Abramson Cancer Center of The University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Maquilan G, Grover S, Alonso-Basanta M, Lustig RA. Acute toxicity profile of patients with low-grade gliomas and meningiomas receiving proton therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;37(5):438-43. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827de86b. PubMed 23388559 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01024907
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2009
Start date
Dec 17, 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Feb 2014
Last update
Dec 10, 2020

Study contacts

Robert Lustig
principal investigator · Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion