ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT00977977Updated Oct 26, 2026

Rituximab Plus Cyclosporine in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Rituximab Infusion and Oral Cyclosporine in Nephrotic Syndrome, Proteinuria and Autoimmune Disease, sponsored by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2010; still recruiting 15 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Membranous nephropathy is associated with damage to the walls of the glomeruli, the small blood vessels in the kidneys that filter waste products from the blood. This damage causes leakage of blood proteins into the urine and is associated with low blood protein levels, high blood cholesterol values, and swelling of the legs. These problems can decrease or go away without treatment in about 25 percent of patients, but if they persist, some patients may experience impaired (or loss of) kidney function, blood vessel and heart disease, and a risk of forming blood clots in veins.
  • Kidney biopsies that show that antibodies have been deposited along the glomeruli suggest that specialized cells of the immune system, called B and T cells, are causing damage to the kidneys through their increased activity. To suppress the action of B and T cells and to decrease the harmful deposits in the kidneys, drug treatments are required.
  • Patients with membranous nephropathy are often treated with immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine or cytoxan plus steroids that attempt to reduce or suppress the activity of the immune system, decrease antibody production, and reduce antibody deposits in the kidney. However, not everyone responds to these medications and the kidney disease can return in some patients when the drugs are stopped. Also, there are side effects associated with long term usage of these medications. Rituximab, a different immunosuppressant, has also been used for this purpose. Although cyclosporine and Rituximab have been used separately, they have not been tried in combination as a possible treatment for membranous nephropathy.

Objectives:

- To determine the safety and effectiveness of combining rituximab and cyclosporine to treat membranous nephropathy.

Eligibility:

- Individuals 18 years of age and older who have been diagnosed with membranous nephropathy based on a kidney biopsy done within the preceding 24 months, and who have had excess levels of protein in the urine for at least 6 months based on urine and blood tests.

Design:

  • Potential participants will be screened with an initial clinic evaluation and full medical history.
  • Before the treatment, there will be a run-in period that will last up to 2 months. During this time, participants will be placed on a blood pressure lowering medication and will not take any other immunosuppressant medications.
  • Participants will visit the NIH clinical center for a baseline evaluation, four intravenous infusions of rituximab, and also at 1- to 6-month intervals throughout the study.
  • Active treatment period will involve a 6-month course of cyclosporine and a total of four doses of rituximab. Participants will take cyclosporine tablets twice daily, and have two infusions of rituximab given 2 weeks apart, After 6 months, the cyclosporine dose will slowly be decreased over several weeks and then completely discontinued. Participants will then receive another course (two doses 2 weeks apart) of rituximab, depending on results of blood work.
  • Participants will have frequent blood and urine tests performed to monitor the results of treatment and reduce the chance of side effects.
Read the detailed description

Study Description:

Subjects with idiopathic membranous nephropathy will be treated with a combination of rituximab and cyclosporine. The study hypothesis of combining Rituximab and cyclosporine provides more effective immunosuppression than either agent alone by targeting both arms of the immune system which are believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of MN. The combination of Rituximab and cyclosporine may achieve greater reductions in proteinuria, increase the number of remissions (especially complete) of the nephrotic syndrome, decrease the number of relapses and perhaps reset the immune system, thereby obviating the need for long term immunosuppression. The prolonged effects of Rituximab on the immune system may allow for withdrawal of cyclosporine. Although each of these medications has been used separately in membranous nephropathy, the potential benefits and risks of this combination have not yet been formally explored.

Objectives:

Primary objective:

To determine the safety and effectiveness of combining rituximab and cyclosporine to treat membranous nephropathy by evaluating the acceptable safety profile and efficacy to reduce proteinuria.

Secondary objective:

To evaluate the efficacy to maintain durable remission.

Endpoints:

Primary endpoint:

Incidence of adverse events (AEs) will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

Number of subjects who achieve complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) at 6, 12, and 18 months.

Secondary endpoint:

  1. Time to remission
  2. Time to relapse (in those who achieved a remission)
  3. Change in proteinuria from baseline to 12 months
02

Conditions studied

  • Nephrotic Syndrome
  • Proteinuria
  • Autoimmune Disease
  • Glomerular Disease
  • Membranous Glomerulonephritis

Keywords

  • Kidney Disease
  • Nephrotic Syndrome
  • Autoimmune Diseases
  • Clinical Trial
  • Proteinuria
03

In context

Nephrotic Syndrome

191 studies on the registry are indexed under Nephrotic Syndrome; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 46 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Nephrotic Syndrome.

Browse Nephrotic Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Of its 80 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 51 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  2. Male or female, >= 18 years of age
  3. Nephrotic range proteinuria that persists for at least 6 months post diagnosis of membranous nephropathy greater than 3.5 grams /24 hours (based on 24-hour urine collection).

    a. If the subject s renal function rapidly declines in less than 6 months could proceed with therapy sooner such as complications of the nephrotic syndrome that are not controlled with supportive therapy or evidence of decline in or proteinuria >8 grams/day. Subjects with declining renal function and/or high-grade proteinuria due to MN are considered "high risk" subjects and have a higher probability of progression to end stage kidney disease.

  4. Nephrotic range proteinuria (>3.5 g/24 hours) that persists despite angiotensin antagonist therapy (ACE inhibitor or ARB) for at least 2 months unless intolerant.

    a. The rationale is that blockade of the renin angiotensin system (RAAS) is widely considered to be part of the standard of care treatment for subjects with the nephrotic syndrome. Nephrotic range proteinuria will be defined as an estimated average proteinuria >3.5 g/24 hours in adults based on at least two 24-hour urine protein excretions obtained prior to initiating therapy. Incomplete urine

    collections (based on inadequate creatinine excretion) will be excluded.

  5. Renal within the past 24 months must reveal typical changes of membranous nephropathy by light and electron microscopy or a positive anti-PLA2R antibody test in the serum. There has been a change in the management strategies for MN such that a renal biopsy is not absolutely required for diagnosis if patient has positive circulating anti-PLA2R antibody.

    a. Based on published KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines 3.1.1 patients with MN who are positive for anti-PLA2R do not require renal biopsy as long as renal function is normal (eGFR >60) and has not had immunosuppression as it has been demonstrated that results of the biopsy have not altered clinical approach and management. If not PLA2R positive, renal biopsy within 24 months is still required.

  6. Blood pressure \<=140/90 on >75% of measurement while on anti-hypertensive treatment for at least 1-2 months.
  7. There is no evidence to suggest secondary forms of membranous nephropathy.
  8. Ability to take oral medication and be willing to adhere to the cyclosporine regimen
  9. For females of : use of highly effective for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a method during study participation and for 12 months after the last Rituximab infusion.
  10. For males of reproductive potential: use of condoms or other methods to ensure effective contraception with partner.
  11. Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written document.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Estimated \<40 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 from the preceding 2 months prior to enrollment while on ACEI/ARB therapy.
  2. medications or experimental medications of any type during the three-month period prior to initiating Rituximab and cyclosporine.
  3. Prior exposure to cyclosporine or tacrolimus for more than 6 months and/or evidence of intolerance or toxicity associated with cyclosporine treatment of any duration including irreversible azotemia, liver dysfunction or hypertension
  4. Rituximab use within the previous 12 months.
  5. medical conditions (i.e., severe heart failure class IV, uncontrolled coronary artery disease/unstable angina), which in the opinion of the investigator, could increase the subject s risk of participating in the study or could confound the interpretation of the results of the study.
  6. Positive serology
  7. Positive serology
  8. Active acute or chronic infection requiring antimicrobial therapy or serious viral infection cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, varicella zoster virus (chicken pox or shingles), Parvovirus B19 (can be based on previous medical records within the past 24-months)
  9. Live viral vaccines within one month prior to Rituximab.
  10. Pregnancy or lactation
  11. Cancer diagnosis or cancer recurrence within the preceding 5 years, excluding basal cell carcinoma of the skin. The rationale is that immunosuppression may accelerate cancer progression.
  12. Clinical evidence of cirrhosis or chronic active liver disease sufficiently severe to impair cyclosporine metabolism; this would include a prolonged .
  13. Cytopenia (neutrophils \<1500/mm\^3 and/or thrombocytopenia \<75,000) and/or \<200/mm\^3). The rationale is that Rituximab therapy may be followed by cytopenia with the granulocyte lineage being at greatest risk. Patients with low CD4 T cell counts are prone to infection which can be exacerbated by Rituximab.
  14. Diabetes mellitus. The rationale is that diabetes may lead to worsening of proteinuria that would not respond to immunosuppression and would confound the results.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

CD4 count

The number of CD4 cells, a type of white blood cell, in a given amount of blood. It is used to follow how well the immune system is doing in HIV.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combination of Rituximab plus cyclosporine

    2 infusions (each 1000 mg) separated by 2 weeks; repeated after 6 months. Daily therapy for 6 months (3-5 mg/kg), then tapered and discontinued.

    Drug: Rituximab Infusion · Drug: Oral Cyclosporine

Interventions

  • Drug Rituximab Infusion 2 infusions (each 1000 mg) separated by 2 weeks; repeated after 6 months

  • Daily therapy for 6 months (3-5 mg/kg), then tapered and discontinued

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety

    Safety 24 months We will assess using the National Cancer Institute common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Percentage of complete and partial remissions (CR and PR)

    Proteinuria; complete remission (CR) defined as less than 300 mg/24 proteinuria and partial remission (PR) \<3.5 grams/day and \>=50%reduction of proteinuria

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Percentage of complete and partial remissions (CR and PR)

    Proteinuria; complete remission (CR) defined as less than 300 mg/24 proteinuria and partial remission (PR) \<3.5 grams/day and \>=50%reduction of proteinuria

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Percentage of complete and partial remissions (CR and PR)

    Proteinuria; complete remission (CR) defined as less than 300 mg/24 proteinuria and partial remission (PR) \<3.5 grams/day and \>=50%reduction of proteinuria

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Percentage of complete and partial remissions (CR and PR)

    Proteinuria; complete remission (CR) defined as less than 300 mg/24 proteinuria and partial remission (PR) \<3.5 grams/day and \>=50%reduction of proteinuria

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to remission Baseline to 24 months

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

  2. Time to relapse (in those who achieved a remission)

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

  3. Change in proteinuria from baseline to 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • National Naval Medical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20889, United States
    Recruiting
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Glassock RJ. Diagnosis and natural course of membranous nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2003 Jul;23(4):324-32. doi: 10.1016/s0270-9295(03)00049-4. PubMed 12923720 ↗
  • Cattran D. Management of membranous nephropathy: when and what for treatment. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 May;16(5):1188-94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010028. Epub 2005 Mar 30. No abstract available. PubMed 15800117 ↗
  • Kerjaschki D, Neale TJ. Molecular mechanisms of glomerular injury in rat experimental membranous nephropathy (Heymann nephritis). J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Dec;7(12):2518-26. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7122518. PubMed 8989729 ↗
  • Burbelo PD, Olson SW, Keller JM, Joshi M, Schwartz DM, Chuang YJ, Lambeau G, Beck LH Jr, Waldman M. Prediagnostic Appearance of Thrombospondin Type-1 Domain 7A Autoantibodies in Membranous Nephropathy. Kidney360. 2023 Feb 1;4(2):217-225. doi: 10.34067/KID.0005112022. Epub 2022 Nov 29. PubMed 36821613 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2010 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 204 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2009
First posted
Sep 16, 2009
StartActual
Dec 22, 2010
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00977977
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2009
Start date
Dec 22, 2010
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Meryl A Waldman, M.D.
Contact
waldmanm@mail.nih.gov
(301) 451-6990
Meryl A Waldman, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Rituximab · Cyclosporine

Start the discussion