ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03949855REBOOTUpdated Sep 18, 2026

Belimumab With Rituximab for Primary Membranous Nephropathy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Belimumab and Placebo for Belimumab in Membranous Nephropathy and Nephrotic Syndrome, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Recruiting at 20 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2020; still recruiting 6 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 34 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranous with a site in United States — 12 open to participants now, 15 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Glomerulonephritis, Membranous · United States.

Planned enrollment
10th of 32
58 · median 31
Started
2020
the only one that year
Phase 2
11 of 34
6 open now
Primary completion
2029-03
later than 9 of 14 live
Registered
19th of 34
by date

Among the 34 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranous with a site in United States, this one is the 10th largest by planned enrollment of the 32 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2020, is one of 11 in phase 2, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 14 other live ones, and was the 19th registered.

Glomerulonephritis, Membranous

144 studies on the registry are indexed under Glomerulonephritis, Membranous; 58 are open to participants now.

Browse Glomerulonephritis, Membranous studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 34 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranous with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

6 more — sign in →

All 12 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 40 Glomerulonephritis, Membranous studies recruiting now, 14 (35%) set no upper age limit and 13 (33%) stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 34 studies in Glomerulonephritis, Membranous with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of belimumab and intravenous rituximab co-administration at inducing a complete or partial remission (CR or PR) compared to rituximab alone in participants with primary membranous nephropathy.

Background:

Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is among the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. MN affects individuals of all ages and races. The peak incidence of MN is in the fifth decade of life.

Primary MN is recognized to be an autoimmune disease, a disease where the body's own immune system causes damage to kidneys. This damage can cause the loss of too much protein in the urine.

Drugs used to treat MN aim to reduce the attack by one's own immune system on the kidneys by blocking inflammation and reducing the immune system's function. These drugs can have serious side effects and often do not cure the disease. There is a need for new treatments for MN that are better at improving the disease while reducing fewer treatment associated side effects.

In this study, researchers will evaluate if treatment with a combination of two different drugs, belimumab and rituximab, is effective at blocking the immune attacks on the kidney compared to rituximab alone. Rituximab works by decreasing a type of immune cell, called B cells. B cells are known to have a role in MN. Once these cells are removed, disease may become less active or even inactive. However, after stopping treatment, the body will make new B cells which may cause disease to become active again.

Belimumab works by decreasing the new B cells produced by the body and, may even change the type of new B cells subsequently produced. Belimumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (also referred to as lupus or SLE). Rituximab is approved by the FDA to treat some types of cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and vasculitis. Neither rituximab nor belimumab is approved by the FDA to treat MN. Treatment with a combination of belimumab and rituximab has not been studied in individuals with MN, but has been tested in other autoimmune diseases, including lupus nephritis and Sjögren's syndrome.

Read the detailed description

This trial is a two-part study (Part A and Part B) of adults with primary membranous nephropathy (MN), ages 18-75 inclusive. The study will be conducted at multiple sites in the United States and Canada.

Part A: Open-label Phase

Part A is an open-label, PK study to compare belimumab exposure between participants who have "low" proteinuria (≥ 4 to \< 8 g/day) and "high" proteinuria (≥ 8 g/day) at Visit -1.

Initially Part A planned to enroll 20 individuals with primary MN: 10 individuals with low proteinuria and 10 individuals with high proteinuria. All Part A participants received 200 mg subcutaneous belimumab weekly, the initially approved dose of belimumab in SLE, for 52 doses (weeks 0-51). Trough serum belimumab levels would be obtained weekly following the first 4 doses of belimumab. All participants would receive rituximab 1000 mg IV at weeks 4 and 6, and are followed after the 52 week treatment period on no study medication until week 156.

Belimumab trough levels were to be analyzed after all 20 participants received the first 4 doses to compare the belimumab exposure between the low and high proteinuria groups. If the belimumab exposure was not comparable between the high and low proteinuria groups, the belimumab dose would be doubled to 400 mg/weekly for participants with high proteinuria in Part B. Dose determination for participants with high proteinuria in Part B would be made by an adjudication committee comprised of the Protocol Chair, NIAID Medical Monitor, ITN Clinical Trial Physician, and Rho Scientist, in consultation with the belimumab PK expert at GSK.

Due in part to the observed imbalance in enrollment between the high and low proteinuria groups, an ad hoc PK analysis was conducted. The serum belimumab trough levels of the first 12 participants (8 with high proteinuria and 4 with low proteinuria) who received the first 4 belimumab doses were analyzed to compare belimumab exposure between the low and high proteinuria groups.

The results of the PK analysis were reviewed by the adjudication committee, who determined that the results did not support doubling the dose of belimumab in individuals with high proteinuria nor did it identify a new proteinuria threshold that warranted an increased belimumab dose. The belimumab PK expert at GSK concurred. Thus, enrollment into Part A has been suspended, and all participants in Part B are to receive the same dose of belimumab. All participants currently enrolled in Part A continue to receive belimumab and rituximab as previously planned and are undergoing the safety assessments as presented in Appendix A.

All enrolled participants in Part A will be followed until week 156 and will be assessed for the same study endpoints as participants in Part B.

Part B: Randomized Phase

Part B is a prospective, randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial in adults with primary MN to assess the effectiveness of belimumab and rituximab at treating primary MN. Part B is commencing after the completion of the ad hoc PK analysis, which did not support increasing the belimumab dose in participants with high proteinuria.

A total of 58 participants will be randomized into two treatment arms.

Randomization will be stratified by low (≥ 4 to \< 8 g/day) and high proteinuria (≥ 8 g/day). Eleven participants who entered Part B prior to protocol version 7.0 were randomized at a 1:1 ratio; 47 participants entering at or after protocol version 7.0 will be randomized at a 3:1 ratio. A total of 41 participants are projected to be enrolled in the belimumab and rituximab arm and 17 participants in the belimumab placebo and rituximab arm. The effectiveness of belimumab with rituximab will be evaluated using a hybrid control arm that combines participants who receive belimumab placebo and rituximab in this study and the subgroup of subjects with primary MN in the MENTOR trial who were anti-PLA2R positive at baseline and received rituximab alone. The randomized arms will also be used to evaluate the safety of adding belimumab to rituximab in primary MN and to support mechanistic studies.

Participants randomized to the belimumab and rituximab arm will receive subcutaneous belimumab 400 mg (two 200 mg injections) once weekly from weeks 0-3, and then 200 mg once weekly from weeks 4-51. This dosing regimen is based on the recommended dosing of subcutaneous belimumab for lupus nephritis. Participants randomized to the belimumab placebo and rituximab arm will receive subcutaneous belimumab placebo according to the same dose and schedule.

Participants in both arms will receive rituximab 1000 mg IV at weeks 4 and 6.

At week 30, participants will be assessed for a response to study treatment. Participants who meet at least two of the following three criteria at week 30 will be considered to have an inadequate response to study treatment and, defined as fulfilling at least two of the following three criteria at week 30, will receive a second course of rituximab (defined as 1000 mg IV given at weeks 34 and 36):

  • Anti-PLA2R levels is ≥ 25% of baseline
  • Proteinuria is ≥ 50% of baseline
  • Serum albumin is \< 2.8 g/dL

After the 52 week treatment period, all participants will be followed on no study medication with assessment of the primary endpoint (CR or PR) at week 104.

The primary endpoint will be assessed at week 104 because the proteinuric response to treatment is known to lag behind the active treatment period and is recommended to be assessed at least 18 months after the initiation of therapy. There will be a tolerance endpoint at week 156 to determine if treatment with belimumab with rituximab results in a more durable remission compared to rituximab alone, and to assess the rate of relapse after having achieved complete or partial remission.

03

Conditions studied

  • Membranous Nephropathy
  • Nephrotic Syndrome

Keywords

  • Primary Membranous Nephropathy
  • nephrotic syndrome
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK) Analysis
  • Double-Blind (Masked), Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Co-administered belimumab and rituximab
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for this study-

  1. Age 18 to 75 years inclusive
  2. Diagnosis of one of the following:

    1. Primary MN confirmed by a kidney within the past 5 years
    2. Primary MN that is relapsing following a CR (Section 3.3.1) or PR (Section 3.3.2), confirmed by a kidney biopsy within the past 7 years
    3. Nephrotic syndrome with > 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and no history of treatment (e.g. , cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, B-cell depleting agent) for nephrotic syndrome, and without evidence of a secondary cause of nephrotic syndrome
    4. Nephrotic syndrome and a to kidney biopsy (e.g., anticoagulation, solitary kidney, body habitus that increases the risk of biopsy, or other contraindication in the opinion of the investigator), and without evidence of a secondary cause of nephrotic syndrome
  3. Serum anti-PLA2R positive
  4. eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m2 while on maximally tolerated RAS blockade
  5. Proteinuria:

    1. ≥ 4 and \< 8 g/day that has persisted for at least the previous 3 months while on maximally tolerated RAS blockade. Documentation of persistent proteinuria may be from a 24-hour collection or calculated from a spot urine collection. Or,
    2. ≥ 8 g/day while on maximally tolerated RAS blockade
  6. Blood pressure while on maximally tolerated RAS blockade:

    1. Systolic blood pressure ≤ 140 mmHg
    2. Diastolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will not be eligible for this study-

  1. Secondary cause of MN (e.g., SLE, drug, infection, ) suggested by review of the patient's medical history and/or clinical presentation
  2. Rituximab use within the previous 12 months
  3. Rituximab use > 12 months ago:

    1. With an undetectable CD19 B cell count, or
    2. Did not result in a CR (Section 3.3.1) or PR (Section 3.3.2) with rituximab treatment alone (e.g., without other or immunomodulatory therapy)
  4. Use of anti-B cell therapy other than rituximab within the previous 12 months (or 5 half-lives, whichever is greater)
  5. Cyclophosphamide use within the past 3 months
  6. Use of other immunosuppressive medications such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus within the past 30 days
  7. Use of systemic within the past 30 days
  8. Use of any biologic agent (defined as any drug not approved for sale in the country it is used) in the previous 12 months
  9. Use of any non-biologic investigational agent in the past 30 days (or 5 half-lives, whichever is greater)
  10. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus defined as (HbA1c) ≥ 9.0%
  11. Patients with diabetic glomerulopathy on renal that is:

    1. Greater than Class I diabetic glomerulopathy, or
    2. Class I diabetic glomerulopathy with a history of poor diabetic control (e.g., HbA1c ≥ 9.0%) since time of biopsy
  12. Unstable kidney function defined as > 20% decrease in during the previous 3 months due to primary MN, as determined by the site investigator in consultation with the protocol chair
  13. Decrease in proteinuria by 50% or more during the previous 12 months
  14. WBC count \< 3.0 x 103/μl
  15. \< 1.5 x 103/μl
  16. Moderately severe anemia ( \< 9 g/dL)
  17. History of primary immunodeficiency
  18. Serum IgA \< 10 mg/dL
  19. (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 2x the (ULN)
  20. Positive serology
  21. Positive serology, unless treated with anti-viral therapy with achievement of a sustained virologic response (undetectable viral load 24 weeks after cessation of therapy)
  22. Evidence of current or prior infection with , as indicated by positive HBsAg or positive HBcAb
  23. Positive QuantiFERON - TB Gold test results. PPD tuberculin test may be substituted for QuantiFERON - TB Gold test
  24. History of lung disease with FVC \< 70% predicted, DLCO \< 70% predicted, or requiring supplemental oxygen
  25. History of malignant neoplasm within the last 5 years except for basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated locally and with no evidence of disease for 3 years
  26. Absence of individualized, age-appropriate cancer screening
  27. Women of who are pregnant, nursing, or unwilling to be sexually inactive or use FDA-approved until week 104
  28. Acute or chronic infection, including current use of suppressive therapy for chronic infection, hospitalization for treatment of infection in the past 60 days, or parenteral anti-microbial (including anti-bacterial, anti-viral, or anti-fungal agents) use in the past 60 days for infection
  29. History of an anaphylactic reaction or known sensitivity or intolerance to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins, or monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab or belimumab
  30. Evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation in the last 2 months, or who in the investigator's judgment, poses a significant suicide risk
  31. Evidence of current drug or alcohol abuse or dependence, or a history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence in the past 12 months
  32. Vaccination with a within the past 30 days
  33. Other diseases or conditions or other abnormal laboratory value which in the opinion of the investigator would put the patient at risk or confound the results of the study
  34. Inability to comply with study and follow-up procedures
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part A: Low Proteinuria Group - Belimumab and Rituximab

    Open-label pharmacokinetics (PK) phase. Participants with low proteinuria classification will receive belimumab weekly subcutaneous injections (52 doses administered Week 0 to Week 51) and rituximab infusions at Weeks 4 and 6. Low proteinuria classification: The excretion of ≥4 to \<8 g/day of protein by the kidneys in adults. (Normal in adults: 0.15 g/day).

    Drug: Belimumab · Drug: Rituximab

  • Experimental
    Part A :High Proteinuria Group - Belimumab and Rituximab

    Open-label pharmacokinetics (PK) phase. Participants with high proteinuria classification will receive belimumab weekly subcutaneous injections (52 doses administered Week 0 to Week 51) and rituximab infusions at Weeks 4 and 6. High proteinuria classification: The excretion of ≥8 g/day of protein by the kidneys in adults. (Normal in adults: 0.15 g/day).

    Drug: Belimumab · Drug: Rituximab

  • Experimental
    Part B: Belimumab and Rituximab

    Participants in the low proteinuria classification stratification, based upon Part A, and randomized to this arm, will receive subcutaneous belimumab 400 mg (two 200 mg injections) once weekly from weeks 0-3, and then 200 mg once weekly from weeks 4-51. Participants will receive rituximab infusions at Weeks 4 and 6. At week 30, participants will be assessed for a response to study treatment. Participants who meet at least two out of the following three criteria at week 30 will be considered to have an inadequate response to study treatment and receive a second course of rituximab (defined as 1000 mg IV given at weeks 34 and 36): * Anti-PLA2R level is ≥ 25% of baseline * Proteinuria is ≥ 50% of baseline * Serum albumin is \< 2.8 g/dL

    Drug: Belimumab · Drug: Rituximab

  • Placebo comparator
    Part B: Placebo and Rituximab

    Participants in the low proteinuria classification stratification, based upon Part A, and randomized to this arm, will receive subcutaneous belimumab placebo 400 mg (two 200 mg injections) once weekly from weeks 0-3, and then 200 mg once weekly from weeks 4-51. Participants will receive rituximab infusions at Weeks 4 and 6. At week 30, participants will be assessed for a response to study treatment. Participants who meet at least two out of the following three criteria at week 30 will be considered to have an inadequate response to study treatment and receive a second course of rituximab (defined as 1000 mg IV given at weeks 34 and 36): * Anti-PLA2R level is ≥ 25% of baseline * Proteinuria is ≥ 50% of baseline * Serum albumin is \< 2.8 g/dL

    Drug: Placebo for Belimumab · Drug: Rituximab

Interventions

  • Belimumab is a recombinant, human, IgG1λ monoclonal antibody. Belimumab will be provided as a 200 mg sterile, liquid product in a prefilled syringe. Each syringe contains 1.0 mL of 200 mg/mL belimumab. Each syringe will be a single use. Standard Weekly dose: Part A: 200 mg. administered subcutaneously. Part B: 400 mg (two 200 mg injections) from weeks 0-3, and then 200 mg from weeks 4-51, administered subcutaneously.

    Also known as: Benlysta®

  • DrugPlacebo for Belimumab

    The placebo control will be provided as a sterile liquid product in a prefilled syringe. Each syringe will be of a single use. Standard weekly dose: Part A: 200 mg. administered subcutaneously. Part B: 400 mg (two 200 mg injections) from weeks 0-3, and then 200 mg from weeks 4-51, administered subcutaneously.

    Also known as: Belimumab placebo

  • Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody with specificity for CD20, a transmembrane protein expressed on B cells from the pre-B to memory cell development stages. Rituximab is supplied at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100 mg/10 mL or 500 mg/50 mL single-use vials for infusion. It is a clear, colorless liquid. Dose: 1000 mg intravenously (IV), Week 4 and -6.

    Also known as: Rituxan®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants in Complete or Partial Remission (CR or PR) at Week 104.

    . CR is defined as proteinuria of ≤ 0.3 g/day with a serum albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL. PR is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in proteinuria compared to baseline and proteinuria \< 3.5 g/day glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline.

    Time frame: Week 104

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants in Complete or Partial Remission (CR or PR) at Week 52 and Week 156.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 156

  2. Proportion of Participants in Complete Remission (CR) at Week 52, Week 104 and Week 156.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  3. Proportion of Participants in PR but not CR at Week 52, Week 104, Week 156.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  4. Time to Relapse for Participants who Achieved CR or PR.

    Time frame: Up to 156 Weeks (3 Years)

  5. Level of Proteinuria at Week 52, Week 104 and Week 156.

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  6. Proportion of participants meeting criteria for a second course of rituximab at week 30

    Time frame: Week 30

  7. Proportion of Participants in CR or PR and Anti-PLA2R Negative at week 52, 104, and 156

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  8. Proportion of Participants in PR and Anti-PLA2R Negative at week 52, 104, and 156

    Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

  9. Proportion of participants in PR but not CR and who are anti-PLA2R negative at week 52, 104, and 156

    Time frame: Week 52, Week104, Week 156

  10. Proportion of Participants who are Anti-PLA2R Negative at week 52, 104, and 156

    Time frame: Week 52, Week104, Week 156

  11. Quality of life at weeks 52, 104, and 156

    Time frame: Week 52, Week104, Week 156

  12. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs).

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52

  13. Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Events (AEs): By Treatment Group

    Reference: NCI-CTCAE manual titled, National Cancer Institute (NCI)s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (published November 27, 2017).

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52

  14. Incidence of Arterial Thromboembolic Events: By Treatment Group

    Peripheral vascular embolism, mesenteric infarct, or myocardial infarction.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52

  15. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolic Events: By Treatment Group

    Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) is defined as a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT): the formation of a blood clot in a deep vein, detected by systematic compression ultrasonography, symptomatic DVT, or symptomatic fatal or non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). An embolism is a clot in the blood that forms and blocks a blood vessel. A pulmonary embolism is a blood clot that has travelled from elsewhere in the body through the blood stream to block the main artery of the lung or one of its branches.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 52

07

Study locations

20 of 20 sites recruiting
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine: Division of Nephrology
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
    Recruiting
    • Maria El Hachem · Contactmehachem@uabmc.edu · 205-975-0549
    • Dana Rizk · Principal investigator
  • University of Arkansas
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94146, United States
    Recruiting
  • Stanford University School of Medicine: Division of Nephrology
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
    Recruiting
  • The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center:Division of Nephrology and Hypertension
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
    Recruiting
    • Janine LaPage · Contactjlapage@lundquist.org · 310-222-4104
    • Sharon G. Adler · Principal investigator
  • University of Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville: Department of Nephrology and Hypertension
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Div of Nephrology
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
    Recruiting
    • Carlos D Bidot · Contactcbidot2@med.miami.edu · 305-243-8793
    • Jair Munoz Mendoza · Principal investigator
  • Johns Hopkins
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kristin Lyman · Contactklyman1@jh.edu · (734) 276-1248
    • Duvuru Geetha · Principal investigator
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
    Recruiting
    • Lilian V. Howard, CRNP · Contacthowardlv@mail.nih.gov · 301-594-0298
    • Meryl A. Waldman · Principal investigator
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, United States
    Recruiting
    • Marie Grutt · Contactmfrb@med.umich.edu · 734-232-9358
    • Andrea Oliverio · Principal investigator
  • University of Minnesota Health Clinical Research Unit
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
    Recruiting
    • Brady Wallner · Contactwalln080@umn.edu · 612-626-3415
    • Patrick H. Nachman · Principal investigator
  • Washington University in St. Louis
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
    Recruiting
    • Emily Green · Contactgreen.e@wustl.edu · 314-273-0339
    • Tinting Li · Principal investigator
  • University of Nebraska
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
    Recruiting
    • Tammy Jones, RN · Contacttamjones@unmc.edu · 402-559-4335
    • Prasanth Ravipati · Principal investigator
  • Columbia University Medical Center: Division of Nephrology
    New York, New York 10032, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of North Carolina School of Medicine: Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kidney Center
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    Recruiting
    • Sandra Hodnick · Contacthodnics@ccf.org · 216-444-0124
    • John Sedor · Principal investigator
  • Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center: Division of Nephrology
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania: Department of Medicine: Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
    Recruiting
  • Providence Medical Research Center, Providence Health Care: Nephrology
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ayoub I, Nachman PH. Advances in ANCA-associated vasculitis and lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021 Feb;17(2):89-90. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00388-x. No abstract available. PubMed 33311560 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The plan is to share data upon completion of the study in: Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts.

Time frame: On average, within 24 months after database lock for the trial.

Access criteria: Open access.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.immport.org

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2029, 107 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2019
First posted
May 14, 2019
StartActual
Mar 6, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2030
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03949855
Collaborators
Immune Tolerance Network (ITN), GlaxoSmithKline, PPD Development, LP, Rho Federal Systems Division, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2019
Start date
Mar 6, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Patrick Nachman
study chair · University of Minnesota, Department of Medicine, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension
Iñaki Sanz
study chair · Emory University, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Belimumab

Start the discussion