CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00696683Updated Jun 13, 2008

Establishment of Natural History of Scorpion Envenomation

An observational study in Scorpion Sting Envenomation, sponsored by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-06-13.

Sponsored by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
97
Ages
6 Months to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This retrospective study was conducted to collect data from approximately 100 patients from 6 months to 18 years of age who were stung by a scorpion but were not treated with antivenom. The study consisted of a review of hospital records of patients who were admitted for intensive care management of scorpion envenomation, at the only two hospitals in North America known to admit children routinely for scorpion sting management without antivenom. The standard of care consisted of symptomatic and supportive care, including airway maintenance, fluid and electrolyte support and, if necessary, sedation.

Read the detailed description

The study objective was to document the clinical syndrome of scorpion envenomation in the absence of antivenom treatment in pediatric patients. This was done to establish historical control data on the time from sting to the time of resolution of signs of envenomation. These historical control data are intended to be used for comparison with Alacramyn treated patients in two prospective studies being conducted in Mexico and the U.S.for which a control population could not otherwise be established.

The total duration of clinically important systemic signs of envenomation was determined based upon overall investigator assessment of the last signs of any respiratory compromise, any pathological agitation or other indicator of continuing illness (e.g., continuing need for sedative administration).

To facilitate comparison of these historical data with prospective open label trials, periodic assessments of the overall presence or absence of clinically important signs was performed. Periodic assessments were also performed for each individual component indicator of respiratory compromise and of pathological agitation, when available.

A research nurse reviewed hospital discharge diagnoses for all pediatric charts coded for "scorpion sting". For these cases demographic, diagnostic, and therapeutic data were entered on the case report form (CRF) as well as data necessary to assess compliance with study inclusion and exclusion criteria.

A physician subinvestigator reviewed the research nurse's findings for the key outcome indicators, which consisted of clinically important systemic signs of scorpion envenomation and adjunctive sedation treatment (dose and timing of dose) when medical judgment was required.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scorpion Sting Envenomation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • scorpion
  • sting
  • envenomation
  • antivenom
03

In context

Poisoning

209 studies on the registry are indexed under Poisoning; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is below the median of 121 across 94 observational studies indexed under Poisoning.

Browse Poisoning studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Male and female patients 6 months to 18 years of age who presented for emergency treatment of scorpion sting and who had clinically important systemic signs of envenomation were included.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females 6 months to 18 years of age
  • Presenting for emergency treatment with clinically important systemic signs of scorpion sting envenomation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of any antivenom within the last month or concomitantly
  • Signs and symptoms confined to local sting site
  • Concurrent medical condition involving a baseline neurologic status mimicking envenomation (chorea, tardive dyskinesia, uncontrolled epilepsy)
  • Incomplete or unavailable medical record
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • A

    Patients from the identified scorpion envenomation cases, who met inclusion/exclusion criteria.

    Other: None, this is an observational study

Interventions

  • OtherNone, this is an observational study
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of overall duration of clinically important signs of scorpion envenomation (Clinically important signs of envenomation were divided into those indicative of respiratory distress and those comprising pathological agitation)

    Time frame: 4 hours or discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. To characterize treatment in the absence of antivenom (total dose, maximum rate per hour and duration of use of midazolam)

    Time frame: 4 hours or discharge

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Arizona Health Science Center & Tucson Medical Center
    Tucson, Arizona 210202, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00696683
Lead sponsor
Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
Collaborators
University of Arizona
First posted
Jun 13, 2008
Start date
Aug 2004
Primary completion
Aug 2004
Completion
Jul 2005
Last update
Jun 13, 2008

Study contacts

Walter García, MD
study chair · Instituto Bioclon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion