ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07456592ALPTH1Updated Mar 11, 2026

Development of an Aptamer-based Lateral Flow Device for Point-of-care Detection of Toxic Chinese Medicine Herbs (ALPTH Project)

An observational study in Aconite Poisoning, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 2 sites in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-11.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aconitine and related alkaloids are potent cardiotoxins and neurotoxins found in the Aconitum species used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), such as 'Chuanwu', 'Caowu' and 'Fuzi'. They pose significant health risks when used inappropriately without professional supervision. Patients with acute aconite poisoning often present with a combination of cardiovascular, neurological, and gastrointestinal toxicities, which can occur after an overdose, inadequate processing of the aconite roots, erroneous use of tincture preparations, and contamination or substitution of other herbs with aconite roots. Timely diagnosis of aconite poisoning remains challenging due to the long laboratory turnaround time. The aim of this study is to develop an aptamer-based lateral flow device (LFD) for point-of-care detection of aconitine and its metabolites (benzoylaconine and aconine) and evaluate its diagnostic performance.

Read the detailed description

In this study, the investigators will first develop an aptamer-based LFD for point-of-care detection of aconitine, benzoylaconine and aconine in human urine samples. The investigators will perform in vitro selection of binding aptamers for each of the target alkaloids (aconitine, benzoylaconine and aconine) using systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). High throughput sequencing (HTS) and bioinformatics analysis will be performed to characterise the selected aptamers. The selected aptamers will be integrated into ELISA and LFD competition assay. Spiked samples (80 samples, including 20 for each target alkaloids and 20 controls) will be used for calibrating the LFD reader and determining the cutoff points.

The investigators will then conduct a cross-sectional study on stored human urine samples to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the newly developed LFD. The gold standard will be the independent laboratory analysis by the Centre for PanorOmic Sciences (CPOS) at The University of Hong Kong.

Patient urine samples will be stored at 4°C in emergency departments or Chinese medicine clinics. The samples will then be transported to the Laboratory Block of the School of Biomedical Sciences by our research staff within 12 hours of collection. LFD assays will be performed in batch with 5 replicates. 150 µL aliquots of patients' urine sample will be thawed on ice and added to the LFD sample pad. After the flow has completed (approximately 5 minutes), a LFD reader will be used to scan the line intensities for statistical analysis and diagnosis. The operators of the LFD assays will be blinded to the CPOS analytic results.

The primary outcome is the accuracy of the newly developed LFD in detecting aconitine, benzoylaconine and aconine in human urine samples. The secondary outcomes include other diagnostic metrics, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hypothsis is that the LFD can achieve a high diagnostic accuracy, with a sum of the lower bounds of sensitivity and specificity 95% CIs exceeding 1.75.

The study will be conducted in full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The risks of participating in this study will be minimal since the recruited participants only need to submit urine samples. This study will also adhere to the safety guidelines of the University of Hong Kong Biological Safety Policy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aconite Poisoning

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • aconite
  • traditional Chinese medicine
  • poisoning
  • aptamer
  • point-of-care test
03

In context

Poisoning

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Poisoning; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 122 across 41 observational studies indexed under Poisoning.

Browse Poisoning studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The patient participants are recruited from 3 sources. The Aconite Poisoned Group will include adult patients who present to the emergency departments of Queen Mary Hospital or United Christian Hospital and are reported to the Hong Kong Poison Control Centre for acute aconite poisoning.

The Aconite Therapeutic Group will include adult patients who have therapeutic use of aconite in Chinese Medicine Clinics.

The Control Group will include adult emergency department patients who have no exposure to aconitine, benzoylaconine, or aconine within 30 days and no clinical evidence of aconite toxicities

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Aconite Poisoned Group):

  • adult patients aged 18 years or above
  • clinical presentations consistent with acute aconite poisoning, including neurological, gastrointestinal, or cardiovascular symptoms
  • exposure to aconite alkaloids within 3 days

Exclusion Criteria (Aconite Poisoned Group):

  • refusal of for urine collection
  • alternative explanations for clinical presentations

Inclusion Criteria (Aconite Therapeutic Use Group):

  • adult patients aged 18 years or above
  • documented history of using aconite for therapeutic purposes, as prescribed by a qualified practitioner in a Chinese medicine clinic
  • exposure to aconite alkaloids within 3 days

Exclusion Criteria (Aconite Therapeutic Use Group):

- Refusal of informed consent for urine collection.

Inclusion Criteria (Control Group):

  • adults aged 18 years or above
  • no documented history of exposure to aconitine, benzoylaconine, or aconine within 30 days
  • no clinical evidence of aconite toxicities

Exclusion Criteria (Control Group):

  • refusal of informed consent for urine collection
  • recent history of poisoning or overdose from any other substances within 30 days
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Aconite Poisoned Group

    Patients with acute aconite poisoning reported to the Hong Kong Poison Control Centre

  • Aconite Therapeutic Use Group

    Patients with therapeutic use of aconite with no clinical toxicities in Chinese medicine clinics

  • Control Group

    Patients with no exposure to aconite

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The accuracy of the newly developed lateral flow device in detecting aconitine, benzoylaconine and aconine in human urine samples

    The sum of the lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals of sensitivity and specificity

    Time frame: 0 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. True positive

    The number of correctly identified cases with aconite exposure

    Time frame: 0 hour

  2. False positive

    The number of incorrectly identified cases with no aconite exposure

    Time frame: 0 hour

  3. True Negative

    The number of correctly identified cases with no aconite exposure

    Time frame: 0 hour

  4. False Negative

    Number of missed cases with aconite exposure

    Time frame: 0 hour

  5. Sensitivity

    True positive/(True positive + False negative) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

  6. Specificity

    True negative/(False positive + True negative) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

  7. Positive likelihood ratio

    (Sensitivity/ (1 - Specificity)) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

  8. Negative likelihood ratio

    (1 - Sensitivity)/Specificity) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

  9. Positive predictive values

    (True positive/(True positive + False positive)) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

  10. Negative predictive value

    (True negative/(False negative + True negative)) and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

  11. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

    The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and its 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 0 hour

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Additional IRB approval for IPD is required due to local regulations on data privacy

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 14 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 2, 2026
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
StartActual
Oct 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07456592
Collaborators
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, School of Chinese Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Poison Control Centre, Hospital Authority
Responsible party
Lam Pui Kin (Clinical Associate Professor of Practice, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 11, 2026

Study contacts

Rex Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH, FHKCEM
Contact
lampkrex@hku.hk
+85239179413

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion