ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05471479CHARPP-PilotUpdated Jan 29, 2026

Activated CHARcoal in Poisoned Patient - Pilot Trial

A Phase 4 interventional study of Activated Charcoal and No activated charcoal in Charcoal, Decontamination, Poisoning, sponsored by Laval University. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-29.

Sponsored by Laval University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical pilot trial is to determine the feasibility of the clinical trial. Then the large-scale CHARPP will be conducted in order to determine the efficacity of activated charcoal as a treatment for acute poisoning in a diverse population of both adults and children suspected of ingesting toxic substances that activated charcoal can adsorb. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can activated charcoal administered within a specific time frame prevent the progression of toxicity?
  • How does activated charcoal affect the length of stay in the hospital and the intensive care unit? Researchers will compare the intervention arm (receiving activated charcoal) to the control arm (receiving standard supportive care) to see if activated charcoal reduces hospital stay duration, ICU stay and improves overall patient outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to either receive activated charcoal or standard supportive care.
  • Undergo assessments using standardized clinical scales such as the Poison Severity Score and, for children, the PELODS score.
  • Have their functional outcomes evaluated, such as the ability to return to their original residence without help and manage personal hygiene tasks independently.

This structured approach will help clarify the role of activated charcoal in clinical toxicology and inform future treatment protocols.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND: Activated charcoal (AC) is one of the interventions more frequently recommended by poison centers. For instance, in 2020, 32,646 poisoned patients were treated with AC in the United States. This decontamination method has the potential to prevent toxicity and to decrease its severity, but its use is also associated with adverse effects and has a poor palatability. Therefore, we developed a research program named CHARPP (activated CHARcoal in Poisoned Patients) aiming to describe the effect and potential risks associated with the use of AC. This study is particularly focused on whether early administration of activated charcoal can reduce the severity of poisoning outcomes, shorten hospital stays, and mitigate healthcare costs.The first phase of our research program included: a retrospective study and a validation of the Poison Severity Score. The last phase includes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) preceded by a feasibility study in adults and children to compare outcomes in patients who received AC vs those who did not.

OBJECTIVES: This concerns the CHARPP RCT feasibility study which aims to evaluate the possibility of conducting a large multicenter RCT comparing outcomes between poisoned patients who received AC and who did not received AC. The targeted primary outcomes includes: 1) recruitment success (100 patients total at the poison centre associated with hospitals and greater than one patient enrolled/hospital/month), 2) protocol adherence (at least 85% of the patient randomized in the intervention group received AC in less than two hours after group allocation if AC was recommended or did not received it if it was not recommended) and, 3) Less than 5% loss to follow-up. As for the large-scale clinical trial if pilot trial shows feasability, the primary outcome will be progression of toxicity as measured using the Poison Severity Score, a patient-oriented metric frequently used in toxicology; mortality, length of stay in both the intensive care unit and hospital, quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, and changes in the SOFA score for adults and the PELODS score for children.

METHODS: This randomized concealed multicenter trial will take place in one poison centre and five academic hospitals within the provincial network of the centre antipoison du Québec. Patients presenting to the Emergency rooms with a proven or suspected ingestion of a substance absorbed by activated charcoal and the ones who can receive the intervention within 6 hours of proven or suspected intoxication will be included. Patients requiring or who will likely require another gastro-intestinal decontamination method, who have a contraindication to receive AC, or who ingested a substance with an entero-hepatic circulation requiring multi-dose AC will be excluded. Once the poison centre has identified an eligible patient, we will use a web-based system to perform a randomization in random blocks of two or four. Co-interventions will be standardized as per the poison centre protocols. Follow up will be done every 8h by the poison centres who will also collect data regarding progression of toxicity and relevant outcomes. The research assistant who will extract data will be blinded to study allocation. Only a descriptive analysis will be done for the pilot trial. Data from paediatric patients will be analysed separately. A data and safety monitoring board independent from the study group will follow the results and approve or not the continuation of the study.

RELEVANCE: This will be an excellent opportunity to develop collaborations between poison centers and key actors who will be involved in a larger trial. The results of the research program CHARPP have the potential to influence policies, poison centers recommendations, clinicians' practices and to improve poisoned patients' outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Charcoal, Decontamination, Poisoning

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • activated charcoal
  • decontamination
  • poisoning
  • intoxication
  • toxicity
  • clinical trial
  • toxicology
  • Emergency medicine
  • PROBE trial
03

In context

Anthrax

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Anthrax; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Anthrax.

Browse Anthrax studies →

Lead sponsor

Laval University is the lead sponsor of 380 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult and pediatric patients who presented to the hospital less than 6h after the ingestion of a potentially toxic dose of a carbo-adsorbable substance (substance adsorbed by activated charcoal ).
  • Patients who can receive the intervention within 6 hours of proven or suspected intoxication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring or who will likely require another gastro-intestinal decontamination method;
  • Patients who have to the use of activated charcoal;
  • Patients who ingested a substance with an entero-hepatic circulation requiring multi-dose AC;
  • Patients who have no clinical equipoise for the use of activated charcoal as per the attending physician.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AC administration

    Participants will receive 1g/kg up to a maximum of 50g of activated charcoal by mouth or by naso-gastric tube. The intervention is giving over 15 minutes, as recommended. Activated charcoal can be mixed in a black soft drink to improve palatability and treatment adherence which is often done in usual practice.

    Drug: Activated Charcoal

  • Active comparator
    No AC

    Participants will not receive any activated charcoal

    Other: No activated charcoal

Interventions

  • Activated charcoal

    Also known as: AC

  • OtherNo activated charcoal

    No activated charcoal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment success

    100 patients total at the poison centre associated with hospitals and greater than one patient enrolled/hospital/month

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Protocol adherence

    at least 85% of the patient randomized in the intervention group

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. lost to follow-up

    less than 5%

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression of toxicity (descriptive measure of delta Poison Severity Score - PSS max - PSS at randomization calculated at the end of each case)

    measured by the delta Poison Severity Score (min = 0 - better outcome; max = 4 - worse outcome) (and the SOFA - sequential organ failure assessment - score for adults or PELOD -paediatric logistic organ dysfunction - score for children) and available drug levels

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Mortality

    Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital

    Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. functional outcomes (descriptive measure: "back to baseline" or "not back to baseline" calculated at the moment of medical discharge, death or decision of withdrawal of life support)

    The ability of patients to return to their daily lives and activities after treatment. Specifically, the trial looks at whether patients can return to their original residence without help and manage personal hygiene tasks such as toileting independently. Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. adverse events

    Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) Analytic Code

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Feb 2025 up to 6months after publication

Access criteria: Any scientists

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05471479
Lead sponsor
Laval University
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Responsible party
Maude St-Onge (Associate Professor, Clinician-scientist, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2022
Start date
Jul 16, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2026

Study contacts

Maude St-Onge, MD PhD FRCPC
Contact
maude.st-onge.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
418-932-5357
Maude St-Onge, MD PhD FRCPC
principal investigator · CHU de Québec - Université Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Charcoal

Start the discussion