ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00868309Updated Apr 18, 2016Results posted

A Comparison of Crotalinae Equine Immune F(ab)2 Antivenom (Anavip) and Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab,

A Phase 2 interventional study of Anavip and CroFab in Snake Bite and Blood Coagulation Disorders, sponsored by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-18.

Sponsored by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. (part of Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase II study was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study in the United States, involving patients from 18 to 70 years of age, comparing Anavip (Antivenin Crotalinae [pit viper] equine immune F(ab)2; Instituto Bioclon, Mexico City, Mexico) against CroFab (Protherics Inc., Nashville, Tennessee), the only currently approved product for treatment of Crotalinae (pit viper) envenomation in the US.

The study was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that lasting correction of snakebite induced thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia are possible following correction with F(ab)2 antivenom, by analyzing in detail the relationships among platelet count, fibrinogen, venom levels, and antivenom levels in subjects presenting with thrombocytopenia following crotaline viper envenomation. In the study we expected to see a fall in platelet count following Fab treatment, commensurate with that reported in the past. We hypothesized that following F(ab)2 treatment there would be a slower drop in post-treatment platelet counts, with a relatively higher platelet count at any given point in the follow-up period. We further hypothesized that an initial rise and later fall in platelet count would correspond with rise and fall in antivenom levels, and would be mirrored by concurrent drop and rise in levels of unbound circulating venom.

Read the detailed description

The overall objective of this Phase 2 open-label comparative study was to demonstrate that the F(ab)2 antivenom Anavip has significantly longer plasma persistence than does Fab, and that this is associated with a slower rise in venom levels and slower decline in platelet count and fibrinogen following hospital discharge of envenomated subjects. The effectiveness of F(ab)2 in preventing the recurrence of coagulopathies after the subject's discharge from hospital will indicate that, inherently, F(ab)2 antivenom has an improved safety profile relative to the Fab antivenom CroFab in treating envenomation by crotaline vipers.

Each subject was assessed for quantitative serum venom levels. Relatively few historical data exist to support the use of venom levels as a surrogate endpoint in envenomation. However, changes in venom levels have been correlated with coagulopathic effects, during both the acute phase of venom toxicity and the post treatment period of recurrent venom effect. Validation of this surrogate endpoint via correlation of venom effect with platelet count and fibrinogen level in this phase II study is intended to support future studies.

The secondary endpoints were the determination of coagulation abnormalities during the follow up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Snake Bite
  • Blood Coagulation Disorders

Keywords

  • Snake Bite
  • Venom and antivenom kinetics
03

In context

Snake Bites

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Snake Bites; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 70 across 18 interventional studies indexed under Snake Bites.

Browse Snake Bites studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • men and women 18 to 70 years of age
  • presenting for emergency treatment of pit viper bite
  • document read and signed by subject

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to horse serum, sheep serum, or papaya
  • current use of any antivenom, or use within the last month
  • current participation in a clinical drug study, or participation within the last month
  • pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • underlying medical conditions that significantly alter blood coagulation: thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, familial dysfibrinogenemia, leukemia, recent ingestion of superwarfarin compounds (rat poison)
  • use of any medication expected to affect count, coagulation factors, or fibrinogen: chemotherapeutic agents, warfarin, heparin, aspirin
  • No clinical indications of snake bite envenomation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anavip

    The initial dose of study drug was administered in a total volume of 500 mL (initial doses only) IV over 30 minutes for Anavip

    Biological: Anavip

  • Active comparator
    CroFab

    The initial dose of study drug was administered in a total volume of 500 mL (initial doses only) IV over 60 minutes for CroFab, or as permitted by IV access.

    Biological: CroFab

Interventions

  • BiologicalAnavip

    Anavip, 10 vials Intravenous (IV) every 2 hours until initial control has been achieved; then 3 maintenance doses of 4 vials every 6 hrs

    Also known as: Antivenin Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

  • BiologicalCroFab

    CroFab, 5 vials Intravenous (IV) every 2 hours until initial control has been achieved; then 3 maintenance doses of 2 vials every 6 hrs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Detection of Plasma Venom Levels During the Post Acute Treatment Period.

    Time frame: Follow up after Maintenance doses were completed. Two Weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. >50,000 Platelets/mm3

    Thrombocytopenia during follow up period. Two weeks

    Time frame: Follow up after maintenance dose

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2009

Participant flow

Subjects arriving at participating centers with a pit viper bite were evaluated with respect to the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAnavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine Antivenom
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryDetection of Plasma Venom Levels During the Post Acute Treatment Period.
Time frame:
Follow up after Maintenance doses were completed. Two Weeks.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Detection of Plasma Venom Levels During the Post Acute Treatment Period.
participantsAnavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine Antivenom
Detectable venom04
Undetectable venom62
Secondary>50,000 Platelets/mm3

Thrombocytopenia during follow up period. Two weeks

Time frame:
Follow up after maintenance dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
>50,000 Platelets/mm3
participantsAnavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine Antivenom
Thrombocytopenia present03
Thrombocytopenia absent63

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Anavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 Antivenom——6/6 (100%)
CroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine Antivenom——6/6 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAnavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine Antivenom
Rehospitalization for treatment of thrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/61/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventAnavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine Antivenom
pruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/65/6
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/63/6
insomniaPsychiatric disorders1/63/6
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/62/6
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/62/6
pruritus generalisedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/62/6
hyperhidrosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/60/6
petechiaeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/62/6
erythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/62/6
thrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/62/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Anavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine AntivenomTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6612
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Anavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine AntivenomTotal
Mean50.2 ± 4.840.7 ± 16.545.3 ± 12.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Anavip Crotalinae (Pit Viper) Equine Immune F(ab)2 AntivenomCroFab Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, Ovine AntivenomTotal
Female516
Male156
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Tucson snakebite investigational site
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2005, a primary completion of Aug 2006 and a completion of Feb 2007. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2009, 2 years 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 6, 2008
First posted
Mar 24, 2009
Start
Jan 2005
Primary completionActual
Aug 2006
CompletionActual
Feb 2007
Results first posted
Mar 24, 2009
Last update
Apr 18, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00868309
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2009
Start date
Jan 2005
Primary completion
Aug 2006
Completion
Feb 2007
Results posted
Mar 24, 2009
Last update
Apr 18, 2016

Study contacts

Walter García, MD
study director · Instituto Bioclon
Leslie Boyer, MD
principal investigator · University of Arizona
Alejandro Alagón, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Instituto de Biotecnología UNAM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion