ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00652132SIOPEL6Updated May 29, 2018

Cisplatin With or Without Sodium Thiosulfate in Treating Young Patients With Stage I, II, or III Childhood Liver Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of cisplatin and sodium thiosulfate in Liver Cancer and Ototoxicity, sponsored by University of Birmingham. Completed at 16 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 1 Month to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-29.

Sponsored by University of Birmingham · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2007, registered Apr 2008).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
116
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Month to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Chemoprotective drugs, such as sodium thiosulfate, may protect normal cells from the side effects of chemotherapy. It is not yet known whether giving sodium thiosulfate is effective in reducing hearing damage caused by cisplatin in treating young patients with liver cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well sodium thiosulfate works to decrease hearing loss caused by cisplatin in treating young patients with stage I, stage II, or stage III childhood liver cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To assess the efficacy of sodium thiosulfate (STS) to reduce the hearing impairment caused by cisplatin chemotherapy.

Secondary

  • To carefully monitor any potential impact of STS on response to cisplatin and survival.
  • To assess the short- and long-term tolerability of the combination of STS and cisplatin
  • To prospectively evaluate and validate biological, radiological and pathological features of standard-risk hepatoblastoma for future risk adapted management
  • To investigate the effect of STS on the formation of cisplatin-DNA adducts.
  • To prospectively collect patient DNA specifically for the analysis of possible genetic factors that may contribute to the development of treatment-related ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to country, median age (\< 15 months vs ≥ 15 months), and PRETEXT tumor classification (I vs II vs III). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I (Neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin): Patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients with progressive disease after course 4 are taken off study. Patients without evidence of disease progression proceed to surgery. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Arm II (Neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin and sodium thiosulphate): Patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours and sodium thiosulphate IV over 15 minutes (beginning 6 hours after completion of cisplatin) on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients with progressive disease after course 4 are taken off study. Patients without evidence of disease progression proceed to surgery. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours and sodium thiosulphate IV over 15 minutes (as in neoadjuvant therapy) on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo blood collection and tumor biopsies periodically for biological and pharmacological studies consisting of biomarker analysis, gene expression profiling, IHC, proteomic analysis, and gene rearrangement analysis. Patients undergo auditory evaluations at baseline, and at the completion of study treatment or at an age of at least 3.5 years to measure ototoxicity and hearing impairment.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for at least 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Cancer
  • Ototoxicity

Keywords

  • ototoxicity
  • childhood hepatoblastoma
  • stage I childhood liver cancer
  • stage II childhood liver cancer
  • stage III childhood liver cancer
03

In context

Liver Neoplasms

1,345 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Neoplasms; 335 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 116 is above the median of 48 across 928 interventional studies indexed under Liver Neoplasms.

Browse Liver Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion confirmed newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma

  • Standard risk hepatoblastoma (Pretext I,II,III)
  • Age ≤ 18 years and > 1 month
  • Written and national/local ethics committee and regulatory approval
  • Centre/country willing and able to organise audiometry at the minimum required quality standard and to provide the contact details of the Consultant Audiologist or Ear Nose and Throat Surgeon who will take the responsibility for seeing that this is done
  • Ability to comply with requirements for submission of material for central review
  • For females of , a negative pregnancy test prior to study treatment is required.
  • Any patient who is of reproductive age should agree to use adequate for the duration of the trial.

Exclusion:

High risk hepatoblastoma

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Treatment starting more than 15 days from written report
  • Abnormal renal function
  • Any previous chemotherapy
  • Recurrent disease
  • Previous to STS
  • Patient unable to follow the protocol for any reason
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
116 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm I (cisplatin)

    Neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin: patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients with progressive disease after course 4 are taken off study. Patients without evidence of disease progression proceed to surgery. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Drug: cisplatin

  • Experimental
    Arm II (cisplatin + STS)

    Neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin and sodium thiosulphate (STS): patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours and sodium thiosulphate IV over 15 minutes (beginning 6 hours after completion of cisplatin) on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients with progressive disease after course 4 are taken off study. Patients without evidence of disease progression proceed to surgery. Beginning within 3 weeks after surgery, patients receive cisplatin IV over 6 hours and sodium thiosulphate IV over 15 minutes (as in neoadjuvant therapy) on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

    Drug: cisplatin · Drug: sodium thiosulfate

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Brock grade ≥ 1 hearing loss

    To investigate if the administration of sodium thiosulfate simultaneously with the administration of Cisplatin significantly reduces the hearing impairment

    Time frame: End of trial treatment or at an age of 3.5 years, whichever is later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response to preoperative chemotherapy

    Defined as: Complete response (CR): no evidence of disease and normal serum AFP value (for age). Partial response (PR): any tumour volume shrinkage associated with a decreasing serum AFP value, \> 1 log below the original measurement. Stable disease (SD): no tumour volume change and no change, or \< 1 log fall of the serum AFP concentration. Progressive disease (PD): unequivocal increase in 1 or more dimensions and/or any unequivocal increase of the serum AFP concentration (three successive 1-2 weekly determinations) even without clinical (physical and/or radiological) evidence of tumour re-growth.

    Time frame: Following completion of preoperative chemotherapy

  2. Complete resection

    Total macroscopic removal of the tumour as reported by the surgeon and pathologist. In case of any doubt the lack of residual tumour must be confirmed with imaging studies performed

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks after surgery.

  3. Complete remission

    Lack of evidence of residual disease and normal (for age) alpha-foetal protein (AFP). To establish a complete remission all of the following requirements must be fulfilled: * No evidence of tumour intra-abdominally: negative abdominal (including hepatic) ultrasound or CT scan or Magnetic resonance imaging * No evidence of metastases: clear chest X-ray (PA and lateral) for non-metastatic patients. (Normal lung CT scan for patients with lung metastasis at diagnosis, who are high-risk by definition and not treated according to SIOPEL 6). * Serum AFP level either normal or compatible with age for at least 4 weeks after normalisation.

    Time frame: End of trial treatment

  4. Event-free survival (EFS)

    Calculated from the time of randomisation to the first of the following events: progression, relapse, secondary primary malignancy or death.

    Time frame: Until first event or up to 5 years

  5. Overall survival (OS)

    Calculated from the time of randomisation to death.

    Time frame: Until event or up to 5 years

  6. Toxicity as graded by CTCAE v 3.0

    Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events, which are possibly, probably or definitely related to the trial treatment. They will be assessed according to NCI CTCAE v 3.0.

    Time frame: 30 days post treatment

  7. Long-term renal clearance

    By clearance method either EDTA, iohexol or inulin.

    Time frame: Until event or up to 5 years

  8. Feasibility of central audiology review

    The feasibility of central review

    Time frame: End of trial treatment or at an age of 3.5 years, whichever is later

07

Study locations

16 sites
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital
    Birmingham, England B4 6NH, United Kingdom
  • Bristol Royal Hospital for Childre
    Bristol, England BS2 8AE, United Kingdom
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, England CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
  • Royal Marsden - London
    London, England SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
    London, England WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital
    Manchester, England M27 4HA, United Kingdom
  • Queen's Medical Centre
    Nottingham, England NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
  • Sheffield Hallam University - City Campus
    Sheffield, England S1 1WB, United Kingdom
  • Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital
    Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2ZG, United Kingdom
  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children
    Glasgow, Scotland G3 8SJ, United Kingdom
  • The Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales
    Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Royal Hospital For Sick Children
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary
    Leicester, United Kingdom
  • Alder Hey Children's Hospital Trust
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
    Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Southampton Children's Hospital
    Southampton, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brock PR, Maibach R, Childs M, Rajput K, Roebuck D, Sullivan MJ, Laithier V, Ronghe M, Dall'Igna P, Hiyama E, Brichard B, Skeen J, Mateos ME, Capra M, Rangaswami AA, Ansari M, Rechnitzer C, Veal GJ, Covezzoli A, Brugieres L, Perilongo G, Czauderna P, Morland B, Neuwelt EA. Sodium Thiosulfate for Protection from Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):2376-2385. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801109. PubMed 29924955 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00652132
Collaborators
Childhood Liver Tumours Strategy Group - SIOPEL
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2008
Start date
Dec 15, 2007
Primary completion
Sep 4, 2017
Completion
Feb 28, 2018
Last update
May 29, 2018

Study contacts

Milind D. Ronghe, MD
principal investigator · Royal Hospital for Sick Children

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sodium thiosulfate

Start the discussion