ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00591968Updated Jul 22, 2019

Telesonography Adaptation and Use to Improve the Standard of Patient Care Within a Dominican Community

An interventional study of SonoSite Titan portable ultrasound coupled with email telediagnosis in Ascites, Blunt Abdominal Trauma and Cholelithiasis, sponsored by Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Dominican Republic. Open to participants aged 13 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-22.

Sponsored by Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The role of teleradiology has far reaching implications for the health of remote and underserved populations. The ability to coordinate radiographic evaluation and diagnosis from a distance has the potential to raise the standard of patient care throughout the world. Perhaps the safest and most cost effective mode of teleradiology today is telesonography. The current project attempts to determine the extent that telesonography improves the standard of care within a rural government-run primary clinic within the Dominican Republic. The work reported herein is intended to compare the use of telesonography to the current standard of sonographic examination (referral to government hospital 60km from target clinic). The study was conducted by randomly assigning 100 patients with clinical indications for sonographic examination into experimental and control groups. Following a 60-day implementation period, the following research questions will be addressed: 1) To what extent does the use of asynchronous telesonography increase the percentage of definitive diagnoses based on the total number of scans (definitive diagnoses / total number of scans)? 2) To what extent does the use of asynchronous telesonography increase the continuity of care for patients? 3) To what extent does the elapsed time between scanning and final radiological interpretation decrease with the use of asynchronous telesonography? This study will also look at the history of telemedicine / telesonography and its dissemination into the mainstream practice of medicine, explore training protocols that may be used to assist others to establish new telesonography programs in a developing nations, and discuss both advances and persistent barriers to the implementation of telesonography programs.

Hypothesis:

The use of a store-and-forward telesonography system in this setting will increase the speed and number of final diagnoses per scan received by the target clinic and will increase the continuity of care by increasing the number and speed of follow-up appointments to the target clinic.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this project is comparable to the diagnostic imaging goals of the WHO including 1) make safe and reliable diagnostic imaging services available to as many as possible; 2) advise, guide and support those working in the field developing and maintaining diagnostic imaging services; 3) promote the importance of safe and appropriate diagnostic imaging services (WHO, 2007).

This project will use teleultrasound to rapidly diagnose and rule-out abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic pathologies within the sole government-run ambulatory clinic of Veron, Dominican Republic. The clinic's patient records as well as the expert opinion of the clinic's physicians indicate a need for this diagnostic modality. These sources indicate a number of individuals with symptomologies suggestive of abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic pathology including fever, abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, abnormal menses, etc. (see appendix D). Given the large number of construction projects and transportation accidents within this area, it is not uncommon for individuals to present with blunt abdominal trauma. Combine these reasons and other patient indications with the clinic's remote location and the difficulty and/or resistance of members within this community to undergo timely radiological evaluation, and the utility of telesonography becomes immediately recognizable.

If the use of telesonography within this setting is shown to be feasible through this work, future projects will center on the education of native Dominican health care providers regarding the use and long-term operation of telesonography. This study could serve as a gateway to the permanent establishment of high-quality telesonography within this region of the DR. This project could also serve to augment the medical and technological knowledge of both the native health care workers and visiting U.S. medical students.

This study will contribute to the body of knowledge on telesonography by determining to what extent this technology can improve the standard of patient care within this setting. The results of this study will have implications to the practice of medicine within Veron and similar settings within the developing world. The further development of telesonography within this setting is important because it may improve the efficiency of health care through increased diagnoses, decreased time to diagnoses, and increased continuity of care.

While this pilot study focuses mainly on transabdominal evaluation of abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic structures, long-term use of telesonography at the clinic could expand to include regular fetal monitoring, vascular studies, and perhaps interventional procedures granted the clinic physicians are provided with the appropriate training. Given the majority of health disparities within the DR are related to maternal, pre/perinatal, and circulatory pathologies, using telesonography to target these specific abnormalities will be the ultimate goal of a continuing telemedical presence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ascites
  • Blunt Abdominal Trauma
  • Cholelithiasis
  • Cholecystitis
  • Cholangitis
  • Pancreatitis
  • Hydronephrosis
  • Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
  • Hepatitis
  • Portal Hypertension
  • Urolithiasis
  • Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
  • Ovarian Mass
  • Ovarian Torsion

Keywords

  • ultrasound
  • telediagnosis
  • teleultrasound
  • telesonography
  • teleultrasonography
  • teleradiology
  • telemedicine
  • dominican republic
  • puntacana
  • veron
  • store-and-forward
  • asynchronous
03

In context

Ascites

247 studies on the registry are indexed under Ascites; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 106 is above the median of 54 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Ascites.

Browse Ascites studies →

Lead sponsor

Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical suspicion of one or more of the following: ascites, blunt abdominal trauma, cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, hydronephrosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hepatitis, portal hypertension, urolithiasis, abnormal uterine bleeding, or ovarian mass or torsion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urgent condition that requires immediate surgical intervention / transfer to tertiary medical center
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
106 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    1

    The control group will receive traditional ultrasound consults (i.e. travel to nearest tertiary center for intraabdominal sonographic evaluation and return with radiologist's report).

  • Experimental
    2

    The experimental group will receive the teleultrasound service. Participants are randomly assigned to this group. All patients will receive a traditional clinical work-up. An ultrasound examination will be offered if, based on initial clinical evaluation by an attending physician, the patient is found to have symptoms consistent with any the following abnormalities: ascites, blunt abdominal trauma, cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, hydronephrosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hepatitis, portal hypertension, urolithiasis, abnormal uterine bleeding, ovarian mass or torsion.

    Device: SonoSite Titan portable ultrasound coupled with email telediagnosis

Interventions

  • DeviceSonoSite Titan portable ultrasound coupled with email telediagnosis

    Sonographic exam will be performed by principal investigator. A "first-look" diagnosis, correlated with patient symptomology and laboratory analysis, will be made at the point of care. Using a store-and-forward framework, properly formatted non-compressed sonographic images and "Request for Interpretation" (RFI) forms will be transmitted to participating radiologists. RFI forms will be used to record diagnostic findings and rate the quality of the images and/or diagnostic value using a five-point Likert scale. RFI forms will also include a five-digit patient number, age, sex, and symptomology / reason for sonographic exam. Completed RFI forms will be transmitted back to the clinic at the radiologist's earliest convenience.

    Also known as: SonoSite Titan, teleradiology, telesonography, ultrasound telediagnosis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Using frequency distribution graphs, the time to final diagnosis, time to follow-up appointments, and number of successful follow-ups will be compared between the experimental and control groups.

    Time frame: 60 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. A test for significant differences for ordinal data (Likert-scale) will be obtained using the Mann-Whitney test (if data is skewed) or the sign test (if data is non-skewed).

    Time frame: 60 days

  2. Measures of variability for interval data (time) will be obtained using standard deviation.

    Time frame: 60 days

  3. Measures of variability for ordinal data (Likert-scale) will be obtained using a semi-interquartile range and standard deviation.

    Time frame: 60 days

  4. The measure of central tendency will be assessed using the mean.

    Time frame: 60 days

  5. A number of ratios can be extracted from the data including time, number of scans, type of scan, number of reports, number of follow-ups, correct preliminary diagnoses, etc

    Time frame: 60 days

  6. Correlational analysis of the interval data (time) will be obtained between groups using Spearman's rho (r2) and Pearson's r.

    Time frame: 60 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Primary Clinic of Veron
    Punta Cana, La Altagracia 23000, Dominican Republic
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2008, a primary completion of Mar 2008 and a completion of Mar 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 31, 2007
First posted
Jan 11, 2008
Start
Jan 2008
Primary completionActual
Mar 2008
CompletionActual
Mar 2008
Last update
Jul 22, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00591968
Lead sponsor
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2008
Completion
Mar 2008
Last update
Jul 22, 2019

Study contacts

James E Sutherland, D.O.
principal investigator · Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine
Dean Sutphin, Ph.D.
study chair · Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion