ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07923318Updated Nov 6, 2026

Optimal Treatment Strategy for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

An interventional study of Routine Follow-up Paracentesis at 48 Hours and Other in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, Paracentesis and Treatment Efficacy, sponsored by Chonnam National University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Chonnam National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious infection that occurs in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Current clinical practice often includes follow-up paracentesis approximately 48 hours after starting antibiotic treatment to assess the change in the ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count. However, it remains uncertain whether routine follow-up paracentesis improves clinical outcomes compared with a strategy based primarily on clinical response.

This pilot randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether routine follow-up paracentesis is necessary in patients with cirrhosis and SBP. A total of 40 adult patients with SBP will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a routine follow-up paracentesis group or a no-routine follow-up paracentesis group. All participants will receive standard antibiotic therapy and intravenous albumin according to the study protocol.

Participants assigned to the routine follow-up paracentesis group will undergo repeat paracentesis approximately 48 hours after initiation of antibiotic therapy. Ascitic fluid PMN counts and other laboratory findings will be assessed, and antibiotic treatment may be modified according to the treatment response. Participants assigned to the no-routine follow-up paracentesis group will be monitored using clinical symptoms, vital signs, and blood inflammatory markers without scheduled repeat paracentesis. However, paracentesis may be performed at any time if clinically indicated, such as in the presence of worsening abdominal symptoms, persistent fever, or hemodynamic instability.

The study will compare clinical outcomes between the two treatment strategies, including 30-day and 90-day survival, treatment response, duration of antibiotic therapy, length of hospital stay, SBP recurrence, complications, new infections, and medical costs. The results of this pilot study are intended to provide preliminary evidence for determining whether routine follow-up paracentesis can be safely avoided in selected patients with SBP and to inform the design of a larger randomized controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
  • Paracentesis
  • Treatment Efficacy
  • Adverse Events
  • Survival Rate

Keywords

  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Paracentesis
  • Ascites
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,298 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 338 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 78 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Chonnam National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 72 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis based on clinical, histologic, or imaging findings
  • Diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis confirmed by an ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count of ≥250 cells/mm³ at initial paracentesis
  • Ability and willingness to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected secondary bacterial peritonitis, including suspected perforation of a gastrointestinal organ
  • Inability to safely undergo paracentesis, defined as count \<20,000/mm³ or international normalized ratio (PT-INR) >3.0
  • Active bleeding or shock
  • Expected survival of less than 48 hours
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Previous ascitic fluid or blood culture demonstrating resistance to cefotaxime or ceftriaxone
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would prevent adherence to the study protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A (Routine Follow-up Paracentesis)

    Routine follow-up paracentesis approximately 48 hours after initiation of antibiotic therapy.

    Procedure: Routine Follow-up Paracentesis at 48 Hours

  • Active comparator
    B (No Routine Follow-up Paracentesis)

    No routine follow-up paracentesis; paracentesis will be performed only when clinically indicated.

    Procedure: Other

Interventions

  • ProcedureRoutine Follow-up Paracentesis at 48 Hours

    Participants assigned to the routine follow-up paracentesis arm will undergo repeat paracentesis approximately 48 hours after initiation of antibiotic therapy for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Ascitic fluid will be analyzed for polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count, bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility, and biochemical parameters. If the ascitic fluid PMN count has not decreased by at least 25% from baseline, antibiotic therapy may be escalated according to the study protocol. Standard antibiotic therapy and intravenous albumin will be administered according to the study protocol.

  • ProcedureOther

    Participants will not undergo scheduled follow-up paracentesis at approximately 48 hours. Treatment response will be assessed based on clinical symptoms, vital signs, and blood inflammatory markers. Paracentesis may be performed if clinically indicated, such as for worsening abdominal symptoms, persistent fever, or hemodynamic instability. Standard antibiotic therapy and intravenous albumin will be administered according to the study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30 Day Overall Survival

    The proportion of participants who are alive at 30 days after randomization. Survival status will be assessed during hospitalization or through outpatient follow-up or telephone contact after discharge.

    Time frame: 30 days after randomization

  2. 90 Day Overall Survival

    The proportion of participants who are alive at 90 days after randomization. Survival status will be assessed during hospitalization or through outpatient follow-up or telephone contact after discharge.

    Time frame: 90 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Total number of days from hospital admission to discharge.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to discharge, assessed up to 90 days

  2. Antibiotic-Related Adverse Events

    The proportion of participants experiencing antibiotic-related adverse events, including Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea, drug allergy, or anaphylaxis.

    Time frame: Through index hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

  3. Duration of Antibiotic Therapy

    Total number of days of systemic antibiotic treatment administered for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during the index hospitalization.

    Time frame: From initiation of antibiotic therapy to discontinuation or hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

  4. Recurrence of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

    The proportion of participants who develop recurrent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis within 90 days after randomization.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization

  5. New Infection During Hospitalization

    The proportion of participants who develop a new infection other than the initial episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during the index hospitalization.

    Time frame: Through index hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

  6. Cirrhosis-Related Complications

    The proportion of participants who develop major cirrhosis-related complications, including hepatorenal syndrome or clinically significant bleeding, during follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization

  7. Medical Costs

    Total medical costs incurred during the index hospitalization, including costs associated with paracentesis, laboratory testing, antibiotic treatment, and other inpatient care.

    Time frame: Total direct medical costs (in Korean Won or USD) incurred during the index hospitalization, including costs associated with paracentesis, laboratory testing, antibiotic treatment, and other inpatient care, as assessed from hospital billing records.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — De-identified individual participant data collected during the study, including data dictionaries, will be shared upon reasonable request directed to the principal investigator.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07923318
Lead sponsor
Chonnam National University Hospital
Collaborators
Korean association for study of the liver
Responsible party
Jae Hyun Yoon (M.D., PhD., Chonnam National University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Oct 4, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Eun-chae Yoo, CRC(Clinical research coordinator)
Contact
karenaec5@daum.net
+82-62-220-6216

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion