ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06533345MERCIUpdated Feb 20, 2026

VCOM Pain Free Research Collaborative

An interventional study of Behavior Change Coaching and Nutrition in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-20.

Sponsored by Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Studies estimate that 30% of people worldwide experience chronic pain. The mechanisms causing this pain can vary: a neuropathic offender, such as nerve compression; a structural offender, such as long-term effects of soft tissue damage and repair; or nociplastic, dysfunctional offenders, such as fibromyalgia. The type of pain experienced influences diagnostic and treatment choice. In theory, there's a significant blending of these pain types within individuals and across patients, leading many specialists to view pain classification as a spectrum. Multidisciplinary pain management (MPM) is a standard model for addressing and treating different mechanisms of chronic pain using multiple interventions from different disciplines. Although many clinics employing these strategies have resulted in positive and clinically effective outcomes, the creation and implementation of such facilities have not been widespread. With increasing focus on psychosocial factors that impact pain in conjunction with structural and biomechanical offenders, a need for a whole-person, integrated approach to chronic pain management is needed. We propose an observational study to gather data that will inform the design, implementation, and operation of such a chronic pain research clinic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • Autonomic Dysfunction
  • Sympathetic Dominance
  • Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
  • Dry Needling
  • Nutrition
  • Lifestyle
  • Group Therapy
  • Therapy
  • Trauma
  • Flourishing
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Those experiencing chronic pain, i.e., ongoing pain not relevant to an acute perturbation (e.g., recent injury).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those subjects seeking pharmaceutical intervention
  • Those whose myofascial pain is deemed functional (normal response to acute injury or ongoing pathology
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

    Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

    Other: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

  • Experimental
    Dry Needling

    Dry Needling

    Procedure: Dry Needling

  • Experimental
    Autonomic Recalibration

    Autonomic Recalibration

    Other: Autonomic Recalibration

  • Experimental
    Nutrition

    Nutrition

    Behavioral: Nutrition

  • Experimental
    Behavior Change Coaching

    Behavior Change Coaching

    Behavioral: Behavior Change Coaching

  • Experimental
    Counseling Psychology

    Counseling Psychology

    Behavioral: Counseling Psychology

  • Experimental
    Multiple

    Multiple

    Behavioral: Behavior Change Coaching · Behavioral: Nutrition · Other: Autonomic Recalibration · Procedure: Dry Needling · Other: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment · Behavioral: Counseling Psychology · Other: Multiple Treatments

Interventions

  • BehavioralBehavior Change Coaching

    Done by Dr. Hollingsworth or students via consultations with participants. Participant's health behavior aspirations or target outcomes will be clarified, informed by the participant's interactions with other MERCI providers. Behaviors that move the participant towards their aspirations/outcomes will be explored to find target behaviors that the participant is motivated and able to do. Target behaviors and supporting habits will be designed into the participant's existing routine. The Fogg Behavior Model will be used 1) to find the participant's primary motivation for engaging in target behaviors and 2) to make target behaviors easier to do. Implementation intentions - When/then or If/then plans - will be used to form habits and promote behavior engagement. Adopting a growth mindset will also be discussed. Subsequent consultations will focus on troubleshooting, iterative improvements, and incorporation of new aspirations/outcomes, target behaviors, and supporting habits.

  • BehavioralNutrition

    Nutrition: The nutrition intervention will be conducted as a 12-week protocol with assessment points at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Following consent, eligible participants will work through a self-taught educational module detailing the anti-inflammatory dietary program. Once the module is completed, participants will be scheduled for one-on-one counseling sessions with a Registered Dietitian or a supervised Dietetic Intern or Medical Student on the research team to receive personalized guidance on implementation of the dietary intervention. A dietary recall will be conducted via the automated self-administered dietary assessment tool (ASA24®), which takes about 20 minutes to complete. This survey will be conducted on two non-consecutive days at each timepoint (baseline, 1 month, and 3 months).

  • OtherAutonomic Recalibration

    Participant will be outfitted with the Empatica wrist sensor. An initial history to rule out pathology and document a chief complaint relevant to pain is conducted. An initial head to toe assessment of withdrawal or startle reflex behavior in response to palpation is performed to identify trigger points and establish patterns of sympathetic dominance. The pattern of sympathetic dominance is addressed during treatment by Primal Reflex Release Technique Protocol to inhibit somatic afferent feedback loops and rebalance the autonomic nervous system towards a state of parasympathetic dominance. Day 2 is the same until the initial history and r/o. Here, the history is from the previous day, asking about perception of pain, sleep, digestion, or other pertinent issues brought up on the first visit. Treatment proceeds same as Day 1. Any emotional tags to trigger points are identified and acknowledged. Subjects may be scheduled for follow-up visits if their pain persists.

  • ProcedureDry Needling

    An initial history to document a chief complaint relevant to pain is conducted and to identify and potential contraindications (infection of overlying skin, patient on anticoagulation drugs, 1st trimester of pregnancy, etc.) A physical exam is performed to identify the trigger points causing pain. The subject is educated about the risks/benefits/indications and alternative treatments. The subject is also educated about dry needling aftercare. The skin over the trigger points is cleaned with 70% isopropyl alcohol. The pertinent trigger points are treated with dry needling (95% of time), direct inhibition (2 - 3% of time) or injection of 1% lidocaine in a fan-like fashion (1 - 2 % of the time). Subject is assessed for any bleeding. An office note, including a procedure note, is documented in the subject's record. Subject is scheduled for additional follow-up meeting.

  • OtherOsteopathic Manipulative Treatment

    Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: After inform and consent process, the subject will enter patient room and meet with Dr. Hayes, who will conduct a brief history of patient pain, injuries, and procedures. Subjects will be asked to wear, or change into, athletic shorts or a tank top or loose-fitting T-shirt to facilitate treatment. Subject will undergo a brief somatic dysfunction screen, which involves light tough and manipulation. Once Hayes has diagnosed potential dysfunctions, he will proceed with osteopathic manipulative treatment. Treatment will last anywhere from 15 minutes to 1 hour. At the end of the treatment, subjects will be scheduled for a follow-up visit.

  • BehavioralCounseling Psychology

    Psychoeducation Workshop and Counseling: The psychoeducational group intervention will be done according to the standardized Empowered Relief (Darnall et al., 2024) protocol. Empowered Relief is a single-session, 2-hour group workshop (online or in person) that teaches participants pain neuroscience education, mindfulness principles, and cognitive-behavioral skills. During the program, participants will complete a personalized plan to work toward pain relief. This program requires a certified instructor; Marilyn Cornish (Co-I), a licensed psychologist, is certified. After completion, participants can attend up to 4 individual counseling sessions with a counseling psychology doctoral student (supervised by Marilyn Cornish). Sessions will be approximately 50-60 minutes and will occur every other week. Specific in-session interventions will be tailored to the participant's unique needs but will focus on participants' pain relief plan and overall psychological wellbeing of participants.

  • OtherMultiple Treatments

    Subjects receiving multiple treatment interventions over the same period of time. Example: A subject joins the Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment group and meets with Dr. Hayes for treatment visits. At the same time, they are meeting with Dr. Kirby in a separate visit (or at the same time, if scheduling allows) to discuss Nutrition. Any subjects who were in multiple/overlapping treatment groups will fit this description.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity (NRS Pain Scale)

    0-10 Pain Rating. 0=no pain to 10=pain as intense as you can imagine

    Time frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months

  2. PROMIS (Pain Interference, SF4a)

    Pain interference survey. Answers range from "Not at all" to "Very Much" when relating to the impact of pain on daily life.

    Time frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months

  3. Use of analgesics (QAQ-Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire)

    Survey listing all medications taken for pain. All types are converted in equivalent doses of morphine and scored.

    Time frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months

  4. Human Flourishing (Secure Flourishing Index)

    Measure of Human Flourishing across 6 Domains. Scores range from 0-10 with lower scores indicating lower flourishing and higher scores indicating higher flourishing.

    Time frame: Beginning of each Visit through study completion, an average (anticipated) of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kuntz JL, Young DR, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Meenan RT, Dickerson JF, Keast EM, Fortmann SP. Validity of the Exercise Vital Sign Tool to Assess Physical Activity. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):866-872. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Mar 27. PubMed 33781618 ↗
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. PubMed 2748771 ↗
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available. PubMed 6668417 ↗
  • Barkham, Michael, Bewick, Bridgette, Mullin, Tracy, Gilbody, Simon, Connell, Janice, Cahill, Jane, Mellor-Clark, John, Richards, David, Unsworth, Gisela, Evans, Chris, (2013), The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13 doi: 10.1080/14733145.2012.729069.
  • Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524
  • Hooper, L. M., Stockton, P., Krupnick, J., & Green, B. L. (2011). The development, use, and psychometric properties of the Trauma History Questionnaire. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16, 258-283.
  • Jensen, Mark P., Hypnosis for Chronic Pain Management: Therapist Guide, Treatments That Work (New York, 2011; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Apr. 2015), https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199772377.001.0001, accessed 12 Mar. 2024.
  • Robinson-Papp J, George MC, Wongmek A, Nmashie A, Merlin JS, Ali Y, Epstein L, Green M, Serban S, Sheth P, Simpson DM. The Quantitative Analgesic Questionnaire: A Tool to Capture Patient-Reported Chronic Pain Medication Use. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Sep;50(3):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 23. PubMed 25912277 ↗
  • Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, Chen WH, Choi S, Revicki D, Cella D, Rothrock N, Keefe F, Callahan L, Lai JS. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025. PubMed 20554116 ↗
  • Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, Koss MP, Marks JS. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998 May;14(4):245-58. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8. PubMed 9635069 ↗
  • Edwards LC, Pearce SA, Turner-Stokes L, Jones A. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: an investigation of beliefs in the causes and consequences of pain. Pain. 1992 Dec;51(3):267-272. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90209-T. PubMed 1491853 ↗
  • Vartiainen P, Heiskanen T, Sintonen H, Roine RP, Kalso E. Health-related quality of life change in patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. Eur J Pain. 2019 Aug;23(7):1318-1328. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1398. Epub 2019 May 3. PubMed 30980782 ↗
  • Kress HG, Aldington D, Alon E, Coaccioli S, Collett B, Coluzzi F, Huygen F, Jaksch W, Kalso E, Kocot-Kepska M, Mangas AC, Ferri CM, Mavrocordatos P, Morlion B, Muller-Schwefe G, Nicolaou A, Hernandez CP, Sichere P. A holistic approach to chronic pain management that involves all stakeholders: change is needed. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(9):1743-54. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1072088. Epub 2015 Aug 20. PubMed 26172982 ↗
  • Asmundson GJ, Katz J. Understanding the co-occurrence of anxiety disorders and chronic pain: state-of-the-art. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(10):888-901. doi: 10.1002/da.20600. PubMed 19691031 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Vase L, Hooten WM. Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances. Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2082-2097. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7. PubMed 34062143 ↗
  • Seton B, Pandey R, Piscura MK, Pearson WG Jr. Autonomic Recalibration: A Promising Approach for Alleviating Myofascial Pain Explored in a Retrospective Case Series. Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52450. eCollection 2024 Jan. PubMed 38371140 ↗
  • Charles D, Hudgins T, MacNaughton J, Newman E, Tan J, Wigger M. A systematic review of manual therapy techniques, dry cupping and dry needling in the reduction of myofascial pain and myofascial trigger points. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jul;23(3):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 4. PubMed 31563367 ↗
  • Clar C, Tsertsvadze A, Court R, Hundt GL, Clarke A, Sutcliffe P. Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 28;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-22-12. PubMed 24679336 ↗
  • Mejia-Mejia E, Budidha K, Abay TY, May JM, Kyriacou PA. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Pulse Rate Variability (PRV) for the Assessment of Autonomic Responses. Front Physiol. 2020 Jul 23;11:779. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00779. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32792970 ↗
  • Darnall BD, Burns JW, Hong J, Roy A, Slater K, Poupore-King H, Ziadni MS, You DS, Jung C, Cook KF, Lorig K, Tian L, Mackey SC. Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial. Pain Rep. 2024 Jan 25;9(1):e1116. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001116. eCollection 2024 Jan. PubMed 38288134 ↗
  • Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51. PubMed 11772852 ↗
  • Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR and Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychological assessment. 1995;7(4):524-532

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06533345
Lead sponsor
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine
Responsible party
William Pearson (Discipline Chair for Anatomy, Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 1, 2024
Start date
Aug 30, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2026

Study contacts

Bill Pearson, PhD
Contact
wpearson01@vcom.edu
334-442-4023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion