CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00567697Updated Jan 19, 2012

A Randomized Study Comparing Ranibizumab to Sham in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to CRVO

A Phase 3 interventional study of ranibizumab and ranibizumab in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Macular Edema, sponsored by Aleris Helse. Completed at 4 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-01-19.

Sponsored by Aleris Helse · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective multicenter study comparing patients with CRVO amd secondary macular edema treated with ranibizumab versus sham. Safety and efficacy will be evaluated. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two arms. 32 patients, 6 months follow up. There will be monthly visits with injection the first three months and subsequently new injection if present edema.

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
  • Macular Edema

Keywords

  • ranibizumab
  • CRVO
  • macular edema
  • sham
03

In context

Macular Edema

841 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Edema; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 50 across 619 interventional studies indexed under Macular Edema.

Browse Macular Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Aleris Helse is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female ≥ 50 years
  2. Patients who have findings consistent with CRVO
  3. Patients who have a history of decreased visual acuity ≤ 6 months
  4. Patients who have a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score in the study eye of ≤ 73 (4 m distance) or ≥ 6 (1 m distance) using an ETDRS chart
  5. Patients who have a macular edema verified by OCT
  6. Patients who have macular edema in the study eye with the following characteristics as determined by fluorescein angiography:

    • secondary to non-iscemic CRVO defined as non-perfusion \< 10 DA OR
    • secondary to ischemic CRVO defined as non-perfusion > 10 DA
  7. Willing and able to give written informed consent and who are willing and able to comply with study procedures
  8. Ability to cooperate with photo and OCT examinations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neovascularisations in the study eye at baseline
  2. Previous treatment with or participation in a clinical trial (for either eye) involving anti-angiogenics drugs
  3. Use of other investigational drugs
  4. Prior treatment in the study eye with verteporfin, external-beam radiation therapy, subfoveal laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or transpupillary thermotherapy.
  5. History of submacular surgery in the study eye, glaucoma filtration, corneal transplantation surgery
  6. Previous or current intravitreal or sub-Tenon drug delivery in the study eye
  7. Laserphotocoagulation (juxtafoveal or extrafoveal) in the study eye within one month preceding Baseline
  8. Extracapsular extraction of cataract with phacoemulcification within three months preceding Baseline, or a history of post-complications within the last 12 months preceding Baseline in the study eye (uveitis, cyclitis etc)
  9. History of uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure ≥ 25 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication)
  10. Previous violation of the posterior capsule in the study eye unless it occurred as a result of YAG laser posterior capsulotomy in assosiation with prior, posterior chamber lens implantation
  11. Afakia with absence of the posterior capsule in the study eye
  12. Active intraocular inflammation in the study eye
  13. Any active infection involving the ocular adnexa including infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, endophthalmitis, as well as ideopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye
  14. Vitreous hemorrhage or history og rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole in the study eye
  15. Any current intraocular condition in the study eye (cataract or diabetic retinopathia) that in the opinion of the investigator, could either require medical or surgical intervention during the study period for the next 6 months
  16. Ocular condition that requires chronic concomitant therapy with systemic or topical ocular corticosteroids.
  17. Current treatment for active systemic infection.
  18. Current use or likely need for systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina or optic nerve.
  19. History of other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or might affect interpretation of the results of the study or render the subject at high risk for treatment complications
  20. History of hypersensitivity or allergy to fluorescein
  21. Inability to obtain fundus photographs or fluorescein angiograms of sufficient quality to be analyzed
  22. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  23. Pre-menopausal women of child-bearing potential not using adequate contraception.
  24. History of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 5 years whether or not there is evidence of local recurrance or metastases.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    0.5 ml 10mg/ml (0.5 mg) ranibizumab for intravitreal injection

    Drug: ranibizumab

  • Sham comparator
    B

    Drug: ranibizumab

Interventions

  • Drugranibizumab

    0.5 ml 10mg/ml (0.5 mg) ranibizumab for intravitreal injection. Monthly injection for 3 months, followed by reinjection if edema for a total of 6 months.

  • Drugranibizumab

    Sham injection with an empty, sterile 3-ml stopped glass vial. # monthly sham-injections, followed by reinjection for 3 months if present edema.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary efficacy outcome measure is the mean change from baseline in BCVA score

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean change from baseline in BCVA score, central foveal thickness and in the NEI VFQ-25 near activities subscale.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Bettina Kinge, Retinaklinikken Aleris
    Oslo, 0264, Norway
  • Ingar Stene Johansen
    Oslo, Norway
  • Vegard Forsaa
    Stavanger, Norway
  • Kristian Fossen
    Tromsø, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kinge B, Stordahl PB, Forsaa V, Fossen K, Haugstad M, Helgesen OH, Seland J, Stene-Johansen I. Efficacy of ranibizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: results from the sham-controlled ROCC study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;150(3):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.028. Epub 2010 Jun 29. PubMed 20591399 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00567697
Lead sponsor
Aleris Helse
Collaborators
Novartis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 5, 2007
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Last update
Jan 19, 2012

Study contacts

Bettina Kinge, MD DMSc
principal investigator · Aleris Helse, Oslo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion