An observational study in Nosocomial Bacteremia, Nosocomial Fungemia and MRSA Colonization, sponsored by Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2007-03-19.
Sponsored by Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center · Observational
The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of daily chlorhexidine bathing would decrease the incidence of MRSA and VRE colonization and healthcare associated Bloodstream Infections (BSI) among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients.
Infections due to Staphylococci including MRSA are the predominant nosocomially acquired complication in the intensive care unit. The increasing incidence of MRSA colonization and infection among ICU patients has been attributed to many factors including increased admission of patients already colonized with MRSA to the ICU, poor compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions, delayed identification of MRSA colonized patients, and understaffing. Measures that have proven to limit horizontal transmission between patients and staff and staff to patients include strict attention to barrier precautions and handwashing. Unfortunately both of these strategies require levels of compliance that are often not achieved.
Nosocomial blood stream infections are a leading source of morbidity and mortality among intensive care unit patients. Several modifiable factors have been shown to increase the risk of bloodstream infections. These include lapses in the use of strict sterile technique in the insertion of central venous catheters and improper site preparation. New CDC guidelines on the prevention of catheter related bloodstream infections recommend that the preferential use of chlorhexidine containing skin disinfectants be used for site preparation prior to insertion. The use of chlorhexidine reduces residual skin organisms as well as inhibits their rebound growth and has been demonstrated to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections in comparison to other skin disinfectant products such as povidone-iodine.
As a result of guidelines promoting the use of chlorhexidine, a number of intensive care units have implemented quality improvement projects examining the potential role of chlorhexidine based bathing of intensive care unit patients in reducing nosocomial transmission of multiresisitant organisms such as MRSA and vancomycin-resistant enterocooci (VRE). The goal of the currently proposed study is to analyse existing data from participating intensive care units that have adopted the use of chlorhexidine antisepsis to determine the impact of chlorhexidine on bacterial colonization and nosocomial infections Participating hospitals who have completed quality improvement projects that included the use of chlorhexidine in bathing of ICU patients will submit de-identified data on nosocomial bacteremias and MRSA and VRE colonization during defined time periods where chlorhexidine bathing was used in comparison to time periods where regular bathing procedures were utilized.
297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 5,300 is above the median of 300 across 125 observational studies indexed under Bacteremia.
Browse Bacteremia studies →Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (29%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center