An interventional study of Cryotherapy and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.
Sponsored by Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the few cancers with a rising incidence in the United States, with an estimated 17,000 new cases diagnosed in 2012. Most patients with esophageal cancer present with tumors which are not amenable to surgery and are treated with chemotherapy and radiation. The most common and bothersome symptoms from esophageal cancer is dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Chemotherapy and radiation are effective in shrinking tumors and allowing patients with EAC to swallow more easily; however it usually takes 1-2 months for swallowing to improve with this treatment.
Another method of shrinking esophageal tumors and allowing for better swallowing is endoscopic spray cryotherapy (freezing the tumor from inside the esophagus with the aid of an endoscope); cryotherapy is a well established method for treating cancerous and pre-cancerous esophageal disease. This is a particularly attractive treatment option, as patients with esophageal cancer usually undergo endoscopy on several occasions before starting treatment in order to biopsy and evaluate the tumor.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in treating EAC related dysphagia in patients who are getting ready to start chemotherapy and radiation.
In order to do this the investigators are planning to invite patients who are already undergoing endoscopy for pre-chemotherapy evaluation of known EAC. Patients would undergo cryotherapy after the diagnostic portion of the endoscopy has been completed. After the cryotherapy patients will be contacted by phone in order to evaluate change in symptoms, 2 and 4 weeks after cryotherapy.
Endoscopic spray cryotherapy (EC) is a novel modality for destruction of tissue in the gastrointestinal tract. EC involves the endoscopic application of cryogen [liquid nitrogen (LN)], which destroys tissue by rapid freezing and slow thawing. Immediate effects from tissue freezing include failure of cellular metabolism, membrane damage and local ischemia. Delayed effects may include apoptosis of cancer cells and immune mediated tumor destruction. EC has been used for the treatment of mucosal EAC and palliation of malignant dysphagia since 2007 in multiple tertiary centers, including Washington University in St Louis, with positive results. EC is an attractive modality for the palliation of malignant dysphagia in EAC due to the fact that newly diagnosed patients undergo upper endoscopy (EGD) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as part of initial staging; thus EC could be delivered at the time of the staging endoscopy, without burdening the patient with an additional procedure. However, prospective studies on the efficacy of EC in the short term palliation of malignant dysphagia in EAC have not been performed.
Thus, the goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of EC in the short term palliation of malignant dysphagia in patients with unresectable EAC.
354 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus; 81 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 51 across 277 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus.
Browse Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus studies →Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (29%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)
Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.
Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cryotherapy employs thermal ablation to treat esophageal cancer and BE. Ablation is achieved by intracellular disruption and ischemia that is produced by freeze-thaw cycles using liquid nitrogen or carbon dioxide
EGD is a diagnostic procedure that allows the physician to diagnose and treat problems in the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. The doctor uses a long, flexible, lighted tube called an endoscope.
EUS is a procedure that allows a doctor to obtain images and information about the digestive tract and the surrounding tissue and organs, including the lungs. Ultrasound testing uses sound waves to make a picture of internal organs.
Change in dysphagia severity according to validated symptom score
Time frame: 2 weeks after cryoablation session
Ability to maintain oral intake evaluated by a member of the study team utilizing dysphagia assessment and oral intake assessment instruments who will contact each patient at 1-month intervals while the patient receives chemoradiation
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Assessment of pathologic complete response and clinical complete response at the completion of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation number one.
Results of the re-staging PET-CT will be abstracted from the medical record to document presence or absence of a pathologic complete response
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Assessment of pathologic complete response and clinical complete response at the completion of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation number two.
Results of the surgical explant will be abstracted from the medical record to document presence or absence of a pathologic complete response.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Incidence of procedure related adverse events, classified according to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon
Time frame: 1 week after each procedure; 2 to 3 weeks after each procedure and 8 weeks after completion of the last cryoablation session
Ran from Apr 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 70 months.
Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 41 and three quarters within 70. This study's 70 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center