CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00360724Updated Aug 21, 2017Results posted

Duloxetine for Chronic Depression: a Double-blind Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Duloxetine (Cymbalta) in Dysthymic Disorder and Depressive Disorder NOS, sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-21.

Sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators are studying a new antidepressant medicine, duloxetine, for the treatment of people with chronic depression. Duloxetine (trade name Cymbalta) was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of major depression. The investigators are testing whether this medicine is also effective for adults with chronic depression (dysthymic disorder or dysthymia).

Chronic depression, lasting two or more years, often causes significant suffering and impairment. The investigators study involves a 6 to 10 week double-blind Initial Phase during which half of the participants will take the new medication and half will take a placebo (an inactive look-alike pill). After the Initial Phase, a 12-week Continuation Phase will begin, during which all subjects can be treated with an FDA-approved antidepressant medication.

Eligible subjects may also receive MRI scans, to help the investigators understand how antidepressants work in treating depression.

Read the detailed description

This is a 22-week study of the tolerability, dosing, and efficacy of duloxetine in chronically depressed outpatients. Participants can have Dysthymic Disorder (Dysthymia), or Depression, Not Otherwise Specified (Depression NOS).

The first 10 weeks (Acute Phase) are double blind, placebo-controlled, and the second 12 weeks (Continuation Phase) is open-label and all subjects will receive active medication.

Tests of cytokine functioning will be performed and analyzed for treatment and placebo effects.

In addition, a subset of patients will be enrolled into an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sub-study, in which a variety of brain imaging techniques (including anatomical MRI, functional MRI (fMRI), MR Spectroscopy, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging) will be performed at baseline and week 10. Duloxetine responders will have a third MRI performed at week 22.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dysthymic Disorder
  • Depressive Disorder NOS

Keywords

  • dysthymia
  • dysthymic disorder
  • chronic depression
  • chronic low-grade depression
  • atypical depression
  • minor depression
  • depression NOS
  • depression
  • depressive disorder
  • mood disorder
  • unipolar depression
  • low-grade depression
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is below the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

New York State Psychiatric Institute is the lead sponsor of 425 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Of its 50 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age 20 to 75 years (ages 20 to 60 for MRI sub-study)
  • diagnosis of dysthymic disorder (chronic depression) or depression NOS
  • minimum of 2 years duration of current episode of depression

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current major depression
  • diagnoses including delirium, dementia, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia
  • substance abuse or dependence in the past 6 months
  • pregnant or nursing women
  • serious risk of suicide
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    duloxetine (cymbalta)

    Duloxetine medication: a medication currently marketed in the USA that is reported to have pharmacological effects including reuptake blockage for serotonin and norepinephrine

    Drug: Duloxetine (Cymbalta)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo treatment

    placebo treatment: treatment with placebo capsules that match active medication capsules

    Drug: Duloxetine (Cymbalta)

Interventions

  • DrugDuloxetine (Cymbalta)

    duloxetine medication up to dose of 120 mg/day

    Also known as: duloxetine, Cymbalta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score

    HDRS-24 total score, standardly used rating scale for depression. Score 0-7 no depression; Score 8-16 mild depression; Score 17-23 moderate depression; Score 24 and up severe depression. Range= 0 to 75, higher score=worse depression

    Time frame: Week 10

  2. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score

    HDRS-24 total score, standardly used rating scale for depression. Score 0-7 no depression; Score 8-16 mild depression; Score 17-23 moderate depression; Score 24 and up severe depression. Range= 0 to 75, higher score=worse depression

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)

    CDRS is a 20-item clinician-rated inventory for chronic depressive symptoms. Each item was characterized by an explanatory or illustrative description and rated from 0 (symptom absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). Scores from 0 to 82 with higher score indicating worse depression

    Time frame: Week 10

  2. Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

    A commonly used rating scale for global social function. Range from 0 to 100; higher score=better functioning. 91 - 100 No symptoms. 81 - 90 Absent or minimal symptoms 71 - 80 no more than slight impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning (e.g., temporarily falling behind in schoolwork). 61 - 70 Some mild symptoms 51 - 60 Moderate symptoms 41 - 50 Serious symptoms 31 - 40 Some impairment in reality testing or communication 21 - 30 Behavior is considerably influenced by delusions or hallucinations or serious impairment, in communication or judgment 11 - 20 Some danger of hurting self or others 1 - 10 Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others or persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene or serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death. 0 Inadequate information

    Time frame: Week 10

  3. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression. When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-offs are as follows:\[7\] 0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 10

  4. Clinical Global Impressions Improvement(CGI-I)

    The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement(CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that rate patient's total improvement whether or not comparing to his/her condition at baseline. 0 = Not assessed 1. = Very much improved 2. = Much improved 3. = Minimally improved 4. = No change 5. = Minimally worse 6. = Much worse 7. = Very much worse Higher score=greatest worsening

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  5. Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)

    CDRS is a 20-item clinician-rated inventory for chronic depressive symptoms. Each item was characterized by an explanatory or illustrative description and rated from 0 (symptom absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). Scores from 0 to 82 with higher score indicating worse depression

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression. When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-offs are as follows:\[7\] 0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

    A commonly used rating scale for global social function. Range from 0 to 100; higher score=better functioning. 91 - 100 No symptoms. 81 - 90 Absent or minimal symptoms 71 - 80 no more than slight impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning (e.g., temporarily falling behind in schoolwork). 61 - 70 Some mild symptoms 51 - 60 Moderate symptoms 41 - 50 Serious symptoms 31 - 40 Some impairment in reality testing or communication 21 - 30 Behavior is considerably influenced by delusions or hallucinations or serious impairment, in communication or judgment 11 - 20 Some danger of hurting self or others 1 - 10 Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others or persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene or serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death. 0 Inadequate information

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Resting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)

    To use resting-state fMRI to study the effects of antidepressant therapy on default mode network (DMN) connectivity density.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Resting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)

    To use resting-state fMRI to study the effects of antidepressant therapy on default mode network (DMN) connectivity density.

    Time frame: Follow up

07

Results

Posted Nov 3, 2015

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited by advertisements, website postings, and from the hospital's telephone referral service. Conducted between August 2006 and December 2011. Potential participants provided informed consent for study participation. A physical examination was performed and blood and urine samples were collected, including urine toxicology.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Started3332
Completed2928
Not completed44

Outcome measures

PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score

HDRS-24 total score, standardly used rating scale for depression. Score 0-7 no depression; Score 8-16 mild depression; Score 17-23 moderate depression; Score 24 and up severe depression. Range= 0 to 75, higher score=worse depression

Time frame:
Week 10
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score
Scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score5 ± 3.610 ± 5.5
Statistical analysis
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) vs Placebo Treatment · Repeated Measures ANOVA · p = .003 · F statistics: 9.43time X Drug group, f=9.43,df 1,55, p=.003
PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score

HDRS-24 total score, standardly used rating scale for depression. Score 0-7 no depression; Score 8-16 mild depression; Score 17-23 moderate depression; Score 24 and up severe depression. Range= 0 to 75, higher score=worse depression

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score
Scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 Total Score14.1 ± 3.814.9 ± 3.5
SecondaryCornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)

CDRS is a 20-item clinician-rated inventory for chronic depressive symptoms. Each item was characterized by an explanatory or illustrative description and rated from 0 (symptom absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). Scores from 0 to 82 with higher score indicating worse depression

Time frame:
Week 10
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)
scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)19.1 ± 9.528.5 ± 14.6
Statistical analysis
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) vs Placebo Treatment · Repeated Measures ANOVA · p = 0.05 · F statistics: 8.72Time x Treatment: F=8.72, d.f=1,55, p=0.05
SecondaryGlobal Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

A commonly used rating scale for global social function. Range from 0 to 100; higher score=better functioning. 91 - 100 No symptoms. 81 - 90 Absent or minimal symptoms 71 - 80 no more than slight impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning (e.g., temporarily falling behind in schoolwork). 61 - 70 Some mild symptoms 51 - 60 Moderate symptoms 41 - 50 Serious symptoms 31 - 40 Some impairment in reality testing or communication 21 - 30 Behavior is considerably influenced by delusions or hallucinations or serious impairment, in communication or judgment 11 - 20 Some danger of hurting self or others 1 - 10 Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others or persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene or serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death. 0 Inadequate information

Time frame:
Week 10
Reported as:
Mean · points on rating scale
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)
points on rating scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)69.9 ± 20.965.7 ± 14
Statistical analysis
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) vs Placebo Treatment · Repeated measures ANOVA · p = 0.025 · F statistics: 5.33d.f. 1,55
SecondaryBeck Depression Inventory (BDI)

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression. When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-offs are as follows:\[7\] 0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 10
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)8.5 ± 710.1 ± 6.2
Statistical analysis
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) vs Placebo Treatment · Repeated measures ANOVA · p = 0.6 · F statistics: 0.26d.f.=1,55
SecondaryClinical Global Impressions Improvement(CGI-I)

The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement(CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that rate patient's total improvement whether or not comparing to his/her condition at baseline. 0 = Not assessed 1. = Very much improved 2. = Much improved 3. = Minimally improved 4. = No change 5. = Minimally worse 6. = Much worse 7. = Very much worse Higher score=greatest worsening

Time frame:
10 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Clinical Global Impressions Improvement(CGI-I)
Scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Clinical Global Impressions Improvement(CGI-I)2.4 ± .83 ± 1.1
SecondaryCornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)

CDRS is a 20-item clinician-rated inventory for chronic depressive symptoms. Each item was characterized by an explanatory or illustrative description and rated from 0 (symptom absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). Scores from 0 to 82 with higher score indicating worse depression

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)
Scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS)36.9 ± 8.037.4 ± 8.0
SecondaryBeck Depression Inventory (BDI)

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of depression. When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-offs are as follows:\[7\] 0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Scores on a scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)12.7 ± 5.815.5 ± 5.5
SecondaryGlobal Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)

A commonly used rating scale for global social function. Range from 0 to 100; higher score=better functioning. 91 - 100 No symptoms. 81 - 90 Absent or minimal symptoms 71 - 80 no more than slight impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning (e.g., temporarily falling behind in schoolwork). 61 - 70 Some mild symptoms 51 - 60 Moderate symptoms 41 - 50 Serious symptoms 31 - 40 Some impairment in reality testing or communication 21 - 30 Behavior is considerably influenced by delusions or hallucinations or serious impairment, in communication or judgment 11 - 20 Some danger of hurting self or others 1 - 10 Persistent danger of severely hurting self or others or persistent inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene or serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death. 0 Inadequate information

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · points on rating scale
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)
points on rating scaleDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)62.6 ± 5.858.3 ± 7.0
Other pre-specifiedResting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)

To use resting-state fMRI to study the effects of antidepressant therapy on default mode network (DMN) connectivity density.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of connecting nods
Resting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)
percentage of connecting nodsDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Resting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)0.21 ± 0.080.24 ± 0.06
Statistical analysis
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) vs Placebo Treatment · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.002 · Mean difference (final values): 4.0
Other pre-specifiedResting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)

To use resting-state fMRI to study the effects of antidepressant therapy on default mode network (DMN) connectivity density.

Time frame:
Follow up
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of connecting nods
Resting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)
percentage of connecting nodsDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
Resting-state Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI)0.16 ± 0.060.19 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • Duloxetine (Cymbalta) vs Placebo Treatment · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9 · Mean difference (final values): 0.4

Adverse events

Collected over patients were treated in study for 22 weeks, including 10 weeks double blind medication vs placebo and 12 weeks open label treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Duloxetine (Cymbalta)—0/33 (0%)27/29 (93.1%)
Placebo Treatment—0/32 (0%)22/28 (78.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDuloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo Treatment
GI upsetGastrointestinal disorders7/299/28
FatigueGeneral disorders9/298/28
Decreased AppetiteGeneral disorders8/294/28
Vivid DreamGeneral disorders7/291/28
NauseaGeneral disorders6/295/28
Decreased SleepGeneral disorders6/294/28
DizzinessGeneral disorders2/294/28

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Duloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo TreatmentTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years323264
>=65 years101
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Duloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo TreatmentTotal
Mean41 ± 11.742.1 ± 11.441.6 ± 11.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Duloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo TreatmentTotal
Female181028
Male152237
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Duloxetine (Cymbalta)Placebo TreatmentTotal
United States333265
08

Study locations

1 site
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hellerstein DJ, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Deliyannides DA, Batchelder ST, Black SR, Withers A, O'Shea D, Chen Y. A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of nonmajor chronic depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):984-91. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07230. PubMed 22901348 ↗
  • Yang J, Hellerstein DJ, Chen Y, McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Peterson BS, Wang Z. Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor antidepressant effects on regional connectivity of the thalamus in persistent depressive disorder: evidence from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Brain Commun. 2022 Apr 15;4(3):fcac100. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac100. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35592490 ↗
  • Bansal R, Hellerstein DJ, Sawardekar S, O'Neill J, Peterson BS. Effects of the antidepressant medication duloxetine on brain metabolites in persistent depressive disorder: A randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 19;14(7):e0219679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219679. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31323045 ↗
  • Hellerstein DJ, Hunnicutt-Ferguson K, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Keller S, Peterson BS, Chen Y. Do social functioning and symptoms improve with continuation antidepressant treatment of persistent depressive disorder? An observational study. J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.026. Epub 2016 Dec 20. PubMed 28064115 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00360724
Lead sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2006
Start date
Aug 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Nov 3, 2015
Last update
Aug 21, 2017

Study contacts

David J. Hellerstein, MD
principal investigator · New York State Psychiatric Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion