ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00158288Updated Jan 12, 2017

The Efficacy of Methadyl Acetate (LAAM) and Contingency Management Procedures for Treating Dual Opioid and Cocaine Abuse - 1

A Phase 2 interventional study of LAAM in Behavior Therapy, Cocaine and Contingency Management, sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-12.

Sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although LAAM, a derivative of methadone, has been successfully used as an alternative to methadone maintenance in opioid addicts, its effect on concurrent opioid and cocaine abuse has not been ascertained. Thus, this study proposes to examine the clinical efficacy of low- and high-dose LAAM maintenance on opioid and cocaine use in opioid-dependent cocaine abusers. In addition, since contingency management procedures have demonstrated some success in decreasing cocaine use in cocaine-abusing individuals, this study also proposes to examine the clinical efficacy of the presence or absence of contingency management procedures targeting illicit drug use.

Read the detailed description

One hundred forty male and female opioid-dependent cocaine abusers will be stratified by sex and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups according to a 2 x 2 experimental design: low-dose LAAM (99 mg/wk) with adjunct contingency management procedures; low-dose LAAM (99 mg/wk) without adjunct contingency management procedures; high-dose LAAM (330 mg/wk) with adjunct contingency management procedures; and high-dose LAAM (330 mg/wk) without adjunct contingency management procedures. The duration of the study will be 24 weeks, with LAAM being administered on a thrice-weekly (MWF) basis.

Subjects are inducted onto LAAM during weeks 1-3 and then maintained on their assigned maintenance dose (99 mg/wk or 330 mg/wk) through week 24. During maintenance, the Friday dose will be 1.3 times greater than the Monday and Wednesday dose. At the conclusion of the study, subjects undergo detoxification from LAAM over a 4-week period. For those in the contingency management procedure group, each drug-free urine submitted will result in a voucher worth a certain monetary value that increases for consecutively drug-free urines (weeks 1-12) or a monetary voucher with a fixed value (weeks 13-24). Subjects not assigned to the contingency management procedure will receive monetary vouchers (weeks 1-24) according to a yoked-control schedule (that is, not contingent upon illicit drug abstinence). Vouchers can be exchanged for mutually agreed upon goods and services at any time during the study. Outcome measures will include: 1) treatment retention, 2) illicit drug use, 3) self-reported adverse and opioid withdrawal symptoms, and 4) psychosocial functioning. Follow-up interviews at nine months and/or one year post-study entry will be conducted to determine status post-treatment. Prognostic factors (i.e., sex, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression), will also be examined in relation to treatment outcome and post-treatment status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Behavior Therapy
  • Cocaine
  • Contingency Management
  • Heroin Dependence
  • LAAM
  • Opioid Dependence
  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Alcohol & Drug Use

Keywords

  • Substance Use Disorders
03

In context

Heroin Dependence

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Heroin Dependence; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 140 is above the median of 87 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Heroin Dependence.

Browse Heroin Dependence studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • One hundred forty male and female cocaine-abusing, opioid-dependent individuals between the ages 21-55, with at least 40% women and 40% Afro-Americans, who not be currently enrolled in treatment, will be entered into the study. Subjects must have current opioid dependence as evidenced by documentation of prior treatment for opioid dependence or signs of withdrawal upon administration of naloxone (0.8 mg, i.m.), and opioid-positive urine screen. Subjects also must be current users of cocaine with self-reported use of > 12 gms during the preceding 12 months, self-reported use of > 1 gm/week in the month preceding study entry, and cocaine-positive urine screen. Subjects must fulfill DSM-III-R criteria for opioid and cocaine dependence. These criteria will be ascertained using the substance abuse section of the SCID interview developed for use with DSM-III-R

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria for exclusion include current diagnosis of other drug or alcohol dependence (other than opiates, cocaine or tobacco); ill health (e.g., major cardiovascular, renal, endocrine, hepatic disorder); respiratory condition (e.g., asthma); history of major psychiatric disorder (psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar, major depression); current suicidality; LFT's (i.e., liver enzymes) greater than 3 times normal levels; and pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
140 participants

Interventions

  • BehavioralLAAM
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urine toxicology for cocaine

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System
    West Haven, Connecticut 06516, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oliveto A, Poling J, Sevarino KA, Gonsai KR, McCance-Katz EF, Stine SM, Kosten TR. Efficacy of dose and contingency management procedures in LAAM-maintained cocaine-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Aug 1;79(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.01.007. PubMed 16002025 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 1997 and a completion of Aug 2001. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2005
First posted
Sep 12, 2005
Start
Mar 1997
Completion
Aug 2001
Last update
Jan 12, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00158288
Collaborators
Yale University
First posted
Sep 12, 2005
Start date
Mar 1997
Completion
Aug 2001
Last update
Jan 12, 2017

Study contacts

Alison Oliveto, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Yale University
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2005. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion