ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02774954CTCUpdated Mar 20, 2023Results posted

Change the Cycle: An RCT to Prevent Injection Initiation

An interventional study of Change the Cycle in Substance Abuse, Intravenous, HIV and Heroin Dependence, sponsored by University of Southern California. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-20.

Sponsored by University of Southern California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
979
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will test the efficacy of a hour long, one-on-one, active listening counseling session (called Change the Cycle or CTC) aimed at reducing behaviors among active people who inject drugs (PWID) that research has found to facilitate uptake of injection drug use among non-injectors. The study will involve \~1,100 PWID who will be randomized to CTC or an equal attention control intervention on improving nutrition. Participants will be recruited in Los Angeles and San Francisco, California and followed up at 6 and 12 months to determine changes in direct and indirect facilitation of injection initiation among non-injectors.

Read the detailed description

The study goal is to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the "Change the Cycle" (CTC) intervention. CTC is an hour long, single-session, one-on-one intervention that aims to reduce injection initiation by encouraging active PWID to not promote drug injection, model injection behavior, describe how to inject, or assist in injection initiations of non-injectors. CTC uses the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills (IMB) model to achieve changes among active PWID through seven short modules. Information and motivational domains are addressed in guided conversations about (1) their own first injection episode and consequences, (2) past experiences initiating injection-naive people and consequences, (3) health, legal, and social risks related to injection drugs, (4) health, legal, social risks of initiating people, and (5) identifying their own behaviors that might promote injection among others. The behavioral skills are addressed through (6) skill-building discussions and consideration of common initiation scenarios, and (7) safer injection education.

Aim 1: To test the efficacy of CTC on reducing the number of non-injectors initiated into injection (counts) by PWID. Hypothesis 1: PWID who receive CTC will report initiating fewer non-injectors into drug injection at 6 and 12 months as compared with PWID in the control condition.

Aim 2: To test the efficacy of CTC on reducing the number of times PWID are asked to initiate (counts) someone into injection. Hypothesis 2: PWID who receive CTC will report having been asked fewer times to initiate someone into drug injection at 6 and 12 months as compared with PWID in the control condition.

Aim 3: To test whether injection initiation social learning risks (injecting in front of, describing injection to, and speaking positively about injection to non-injectors) act as mediational mechanisms for the efficacy of the CTC intervention on initiation and request-to-initiate outcomes. Hypothesis 3: Social learning variables will significantly mediate the association between the CTC intervention and episodes of initiating and being requested to initiate someone into drug injection at 6 and 12 months.

To achieve these aims, active PWID (N=1,076) will be randomly assigned to receive CTC or an equal attention control condition in Los Angeles (LA) and San Francisco (SF), CA. Injection initiation and injection initiation social learning variables will be collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using computer-assisted personal-interviewing (CAPI). The equal attention control condition will focus on improving nutrition, specifically increasing fresh water intake and protein consumption, and will replicate CTC in length, theoretical foundation (IMB), and modality (1 on 1 personal session).

02

Conditions studied

  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous
  • HIV
  • Heroin Dependence
  • Opioid Dependence
  • Cocaine Dependence
  • Amphetamine Dependence

Keywords

  • Change the cycle
  • social learning theory
  • people who inject drugs
  • injection drug use
  • Information, Motivation, Behavior Skills Model
  • Longitudinal cohort study
03

In context

Substance Abuse, Intravenous

29 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance Abuse, Intravenous; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 979 is above the median of 117 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Substance Abuse, Intravenous.

Browse Substance Abuse, Intravenous studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California is the lead sponsor of 789 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 69 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (46%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Self-reported Injection an illicit drug in the last 30 days,
  • visible evidence of injection such as track mark or stigmata,
  • at least 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age,
  • no self-reported drug injection in the last 30 days,
  • no physical evidence of recent drug injection.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
979 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Change the cycle

    CTC uses the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills (IMB) model to achieve changes among active PWID through seven short modules. Information and motivational domains are addressed in guided conversations about (1) their own first injection episode and consequences, (2) past experiences initiating injection-naive people and consequences, (3) health, legal, and social risks related to injection drugs, (4) health, legal, social risks of initiating people, and (5) identifying their own behaviors that might promote injection among others. The behavioral skills domain is addressed through a (6) skill-building discussion and rehearsal of responses to possible initiation scenarios, and (7) safer injection education.

    Behavioral: Change the Cycle

  • Active comparator
    Nutrition

    The nutrition equal attention control intervention is a single-session, 60- minute Information-Motivation-Behavioral (IMB) skills-based intervention addressing healthy eating. The healthy eating intervention uses a one-on-one guided conversation between the interventionist and the participant. The intervention addresses (1) information about current eating patterns and recommendations for healthy alternatives (20 minutes), (2) motivations for improving healthy eating by providing feedback to participants on personal responsibility, a menu of alternative change options, a decision balance exercise, and eating goal setting (10 minutes), and (3) Behavioral Self-Management Component (30 minutes) that covers eating scenarios, participant responses, and healthy alternatives to the scenario and the participants feedback.

    Behavioral: Change the Cycle

Interventions

  • BehavioralChange the Cycle

    See previous response

    Also known as: CTC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. People Initiated Into Injection Drug Use

    This data is collected based on responses to the following question: "In the last 6 months, how many people have you helped injected for the first time?"

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Number of Request to Initiate Someone Into Drug Injection

    This data is collected based on responses to the following question: "In the last 6 months, has anyone ASKED you to help them inject an illicit drug for the first time?"

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 20, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Our chief limitation was loss-to-follow-up. Our rate of recapture at 6 month was 62% while are recapture rate between 6 month and 12 month interview was 89%.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited in community settings using targeted sampling approach. The first participant was recruited on June 20, 2016 and the last participant was recruited on October 1, 2017.

Baseline
Participant flow — Baseline
MilestoneChange the CycleNutrition
Started482497
Completed baseline interview and intervention482497
Completed482497
Not completed00
6 Month Follow-up
Participant flow — 6 Month Follow-up
MilestoneChange the CycleNutrition
Started482497
Completed286313
Not completed196184
12 Month Follow-up
Participant flow — 12 Month Follow-up
MilestoneChange the CycleNutrition
Started286313
Completed253279
Not completed3334

Outcome measures

PrimaryPeople Initiated Into Injection Drug Use

This data is collected based on responses to the following question: "In the last 6 months, how many people have you helped injected for the first time?"

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · People initiated
People Initiated Into Injection Drug Use
People initiatedChange the CycleNutrition
People Initiated Into Injection Drug Use2.05 ± 1.433.26 ± 5.43
Statistical analysis
  • Change the Cycle · ANOVA · p = 0.35
PrimaryNumber of Request to Initiate Someone Into Drug Injection

This data is collected based on responses to the following question: "In the last 6 months, has anyone ASKED you to help them inject an illicit drug for the first time?"

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Initiation request
Number of Request to Initiate Someone Into Drug Injection
Initiation requestChange the CycleNutrition
Number of Request to Initiate Someone Into Drug Injection6.42 ± 25.484.06 ± 5.56
Statistical analysis
  • Change the Cycle · ANOVA · p = 0.35

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were tracked for the participants time in the study which could have extended up to 18 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Change the Cycle17/482 (3.5%)0/482 (0%)0/482 (0%)
Nutrition17/497 (3.4%)0/497 (0%)0/497 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years467484951
>=65 years151328
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
Mean42.44 ± 12.2242.17 ± 12.1242.30 ± 12.17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
Female105118223
Male377379756
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
Hispanic or Latino125120245
Not Hispanic or Latino357377734
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native283361
Asian358
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander303
Black or African American94106200
White332326658
More than one race222749
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
United States482497979
People helped inject for the first time in the last 6 months
People helped inject for the first time in the last 6 months(Number of people)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
Mean5.14 ± 13.656.72 ± 25.005.94 ± 20.13
Number of people who asked to be initiated in the last 6 months
Number of people who asked to be initiated in the last 6 months(Number of people)Change the CycleNutritionTotal
Mean11.09 ± 13.6510.45 ± 41.5010.77 ± 36.93
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Southern California
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • RTI International
    San Francisco, California 94101, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 22, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Using the National Addiction and HIV Data Archive program (NAHDAP), we will provide our datasets and codebooks to researchers in a format that facilitates data-sharing. After the completion of the study, the dataset will be de-identified and made available for secondary analysis on the NAHDAP website (http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NAHDAP/). Researchers who request access will be given a password to access the data, documentation, and surveys. As part of the registration process, researchers will sign an agreement to adhere to the data coding guidelines that were developed for the project, will state their intentions for use, and will agree to inform the original investigators of their findings and publications for tracking purposes with acknowledgments to the granting agency. Because the respondents will be identified only by ID codes in the datasets, it will be impossible to identify individuals from the datasets.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: June 2020

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2016 to primary completion in Nov 2018, 29 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2023, 4 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2016
First posted
May 17, 2016
StartActual
Jun 2016
Primary completionActual
Nov 2018
CompletionActual
Nov 2019
Results first posted
Mar 20, 2023
Last update
Mar 20, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02774954
Responsible party
Ricky Bluthenthal (Professor, University of Southern California) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 17, 2016
Start date
Jun 2016
Primary completion
Nov 2018
Completion
Nov 2019
Results posted
Mar 20, 2023
Last update
Mar 20, 2023

Study contacts

Ricky Bluthenthal, PhD
principal investigator · University of Southern California

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion