ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06995885Updated Nov 10, 2026

Development of an Interview-Informed Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) for Opioid Use in the Era of Fentanyl

An observational study in Substance Use Disorders (SUDs), sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) · Observational

Updated Nov 10, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

A Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) is a tool that helps researchers track how much of a substance a person uses. Different versions of the tool are used to track the use of alcohol, cigarettes, and cannabis. But there is no TLFB to track a person s use of nonmedical opioids. (These are opioids not obtained from a medical source; they may also be called "street" opioids.) Researchers are creating an Opioid TLFB (OpiTLFB) that asks better questions and records more useful answers to identify what kinds of nonmedical opioids people are using.

Objective:

To test a new research tool to track a person's use of nonmedical opioids.

Eligibility:

People aged 18 years or older who currently use opioids nonmedically at least once a week.

Design:

Participants will have 1 study visit at a clinic in Baltimore, Maryland. The visit will take 1 to 4 hours.

Participants will sit at a computer with a researcher and fill out a calendar. They will record their use of opioids each day for the past 30 days. They will be asked what the drugs were called and what they looked like. This task might take 30 minutes.

Participants will be interviewed. The researcher will ask about their experiences getting opioids from friends, dealers, or other sources; how the experience of getting opioids has changed over time; and about any changes they have noticed across different areas of Baltimore. Researchers will ask how the OpiTLFB could be easier to fill out and how it could provide more useful information. This task might take 30 minutes.

Participants will provide a urine sample.

Read the detailed description

Study Description:

Observational, on-site study for the purpose of instrument development. Currently used assessments of recent opioid use do not reflect the current market for street opioids. This protocol will use semistructured interviews (supplemented with results from comprehensive toxicology of approximately 1,200 analytes in urine) to develop a workable typology of the current street-opioid market in the Baltimore region, and a TLFB calendar that asks germane questions and offers usable response options for products and amounts.

Objectives:

  1. To conduct semistructured interviews with people who use opioids (PWUOs) in the Baltimore area about their recent opioid use, for development of a TLFB instrument that assesses use in terms that accord with the current conditions of the market.
  2. To perform comprehensive toxicology testing so that an appearancedriven and effect-driven typology of street opioids can be tentatively mapped onto their likely contents.

Endpoints:

  1. At least three consecutive respondents (after an initial minimum of 25 respondents) for whom the OpiTLFB needs no further modification to capture their pattern of opioid use.
  2. Associations between OpiTLFB indices (name, physical appearance, and effects of product) and urine-toxicology results.
02

Conditions studied

  • Substance Use Disorders (SUDs)

Keywords

  • People who use opioids (PWUOs)
  • Opioids
  • Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB)
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,238 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 409 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 251 across 299 observational studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

We may enroll participants in this protocol from the pool that screens for other protocols at the NIDA IRP. We may also advertise for this protocol directly. If we decide to launch an ad campaign for this specific protocol, we will primarily recruit in the Baltimore metro area. We may also recontact previous participants from NIDA IRP studies who have expressed interest in participating in future NIDA studies and agreed to such recontact. Additionally, study team members attend events hosted by the Office of the Clinical Director to engage with local community partners. This includes clinics, treatment facilities, medical facilities, advocacy groups, and local businesses. We conduct outreach at community events/locations such as health expos, festivals, and other local venues. During these events, we display and offer approved recruitment materials.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

To be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet the following criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older
  2. Self-report of current use of opioids obtained in a nonmedical context (i.e., not from a pharmacy or in a healthcare setting), at least once a week.
  3. Able to understand and communicate in written and spoken English.

    Justification: Initial development of the OpiTLFB requires strong, unmediated communication between the study team and the participants. Further development and modification for non-English-speaking interviewees is best undertaken as a separate project when the OpiTLFB is ready for use.

  4. Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written document.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

1. Any medical, psychiatric, or social conditions that the investigators believe would make participation in this protocol not in the best interest of the participant.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • People who use opioids (PWUOs)

    Current use of an opioid obtained in a nonmedical context (i.e., not from a pharmacy or in a healthcare setting), at least weekly

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. At least three consecutive respondents (after an initial minimum of 25 respondents) for whom the OpiTLFB needs no further modification to capture their pattern of opioid use.

    Existing TLFB measures assess opioid use in terms that no longer match what PWUOs can actually obtain. This hampers both baseline characterization and quantification of opioid-use changes in study participants.

    Time frame: 6-24 months

  2. Associations between OpiTLFB indices (name, physical appearance, and effects of product) and urine-toxicology results.

    This will help ensure that our typology of street opioids reflects real and consistent differences in product composition.

    Time frame: 6-24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

32 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 6 months later.

Of 122 non-industry observational studies under Substance-Related Disorders, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 56.

Start moved 32 times since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Nov 2026, last on Nov 10, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 28, 2025
First posted
May 30, 2025
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 29, 2026→Nov 15, 2026
moved 32 times, Sep 25, 2026 – Nov 10, 2026
Show all 32 updates
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Start date Nov 12, 2026→Nov 15, 2026
  2. Nov 9, 2026
    Start date Nov 11, 2026→Nov 12, 2026
  3. Nov 6, 2026
    Start date Nov 10, 2026→Nov 11, 2026
  4. Nov 5, 2026
    Start date Nov 9, 2026→Nov 10, 2026
  5. Nov 4, 2026
    Start date Nov 8, 2026→Nov 9, 2026
  6. Nov 3, 2026
    Start date Nov 5, 2026→Nov 8, 2026
  7. Nov 2, 2026
    Start date Nov 4, 2026→Nov 5, 2026
  8. Oct 30, 2026
    Start date Nov 3, 2026→Nov 4, 2026
  9. Oct 29, 2026
    Start date Nov 2, 2026→Nov 3, 2026
  10. Oct 28, 2026
    Start date Nov 1, 2026→Nov 2, 2026
  11. Oct 27, 2026
    Start date Oct 29, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
  12. Oct 26, 2026
    Start date Oct 28, 2026→Oct 29, 2026
  13. Oct 23, 2026
    Start date Oct 27, 2026→Oct 28, 2026
  14. Oct 22, 2026
    Start date Oct 26, 2026→Oct 27, 2026
  15. Oct 21, 2026
    Start date Oct 25, 2026→Oct 26, 2026
  16. Oct 20, 2026
    Start date Oct 22, 2026→Oct 25, 2026
  17. Oct 19, 2026
    Start date Oct 21, 2026→Oct 22, 2026
  18. Oct 16, 2026
    Start date Oct 20, 2026→Oct 21, 2026
  19. Oct 15, 2026
    Start date Oct 19, 2026→Oct 20, 2026
  20. Oct 14, 2026
    Start date Oct 18, 2026→Oct 19, 2026
  21. Oct 13, 2026
    Start date Oct 14, 2026→Oct 18, 2026
  22. Oct 9, 2026
    Start date Oct 13, 2026→Oct 14, 2026
  23. Oct 8, 2026
    Start date Oct 12, 2026→Oct 13, 2026
  24. Oct 7, 2026
    Start date Oct 11, 2026→Oct 12, 2026
  25. Oct 6, 2026
    Start date Oct 8, 2026→Oct 11, 2026
  26. Oct 5, 2026
    Start date Oct 7, 2026→Oct 8, 2026
  27. Oct 2, 2026
    Start date Oct 6, 2026→Oct 7, 2026
  28. Oct 1, 2026
    Start date Oct 5, 2026→Oct 6, 2026
  29. Sep 30, 2026
    Start date Oct 4, 2026→Oct 5, 2026
  30. Sep 29, 2026
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Oct 4, 2026
  31. Sep 28, 2026
    Start date Sep 30, 2026→Oct 1, 2026
  32. Sep 25, 2026
    Start date Sep 29, 2026→Sep 30, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06995885
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 30, 2025
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

David H Epstein, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion