ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07926295Updated Nov 9, 2026

Dexmedetomidine-Enhanced PENB Plus SCPB vs Interscalene Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

An interventional study of Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine in Postoperative Pain, Diaphragmatic Paralysis and Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery, sponsored by Beni-Suef University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Beni-Suef University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates whether ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve block (PENB) combined with superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB), using bupivacaine enhanced with dexmedetomidine, provides postoperative pain control that is non-inferior to dexmedetomidine-enhanced interscalene block (ISB) in patients undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Interscalene block is the standard regional anesthesia technique for shoulder procedures, but it frequently causes hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (temporary partial or complete weakening of the diaphragm). While the combination of PENB and SCPB avoids motor blockade to the diaphragm, plain local anesthetics may not provide long-lasting analgesia beyond 18 to 24 hours. This randomized trial investigates whether adding perineural dexmedetomidine (a medication that extends regional block duration) to both block techniques delivers equivalent 24-hour pain relief and recovery while significantly reducing the occurrence of diaphragmatic paralysis.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery (ASS) causes severe postoperative pain during the first 24 to 72 hours. While interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is the analgesic gold standard, it carries a high incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) due to phrenic nerve involvement. Multi-injection motor-sparing techniques, such as pericapsular nerve block (PENB) combined with superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB), significantly reduce HDP risk. However, plain bupivacaine in PENB+SCPB lacks extended duration. Perineural dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) is added to both study arms at an equal total dose to close the durability gap while preserving blinding and clinical equipoise.

STUDY PROCEDURES:

All participants receive a standardized general anesthesia protocol (induction with propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 μg/kg, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg; maintenance with isoflurane and oxygen/air). Following induction, ultrasound-guided blocks are performed under strict aseptic conditions:

  • Group A (ISB-D): Receives 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (max 50 μg) deposited between the anterior and middle scalene muscles.
  • Group B (PENB + SCPB-D): Receives 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with two-thirds of the total dexmedetomidine dose injected into the interfascial plane between the deltoid and subscapularis muscles (PENB), PLUS 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with one-third of the total dexmedetomidine dose injected between investing and prevertebral fasciae at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCPB).

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT \& ASSESSMENTS:

Standard post-op analgesia consists of scheduled IV paracetamol (1 g q8h) and IV ketorolac (30 mg q12h), with IV rescue fentanyl (25-50 μg) for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores >3. Pain scores, vital signs, diaphragmatic ultrasound excursions (PACU, 24 h, 48 h), QoR-15 quality of recovery scores (24 h, 48 h, 72 h), and block-related adverse events are prospectively tracked through 72 hours postoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Diaphragmatic Paralysis
  • Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery

Keywords

  • Pericapsular Nerve Block
  • Superficial Cervical Plexus Block
  • Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
  • Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis
  • Motor-Sparing Regional Anesthesia
  • Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Beni-Suef University is the lead sponsor of 349 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 70 years.
  • (ASA) physical status I, II, or III.
  • Scheduled for elective unilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
  • Ability to comprehend and complete the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire.
  • Provision of written prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal of regional anesthesia procedures.
  • Known allergy or to amide local anesthetics or dexmedetomidine.
  • Pre-existing contralateral or bilateral phrenic nerve palsy.
  • Severe (COPD GOLD grade III-IV) or home oxygen dependence (Note: Patients with mild-to-moderate COPD [GOLD grade I-II] remain eligible).
  • Coagulopathy, bleeding disorder, or anticoagulant therapy precluding regional nerve block.
  • Local infection at the designated needle injection site.
  • Pre-existing brachial plexopathy or peripheral neuropathy affecting the operative upper extremity.
  • Second-degree or third-degree atrioventricular block, or symptomatic baseline bradycardia.
  • Pregnancy.
  • (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m².
  • Chronic opioid consumption (regular opioid use exceeding 3 months) or a pre-existing chronic pain syndrome affecting the target shoulder.
  • Cognitive impairment or psychiatric condition precluding reliable self-reported outcome assessment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: ISB-D (Interscalene Block)

    Patients receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) following general anesthesia induction. Under aseptic technique and linear ultrasound probe guidance, 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine mixed with dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg (maximum 50 µg) is deposited around the brachial plexus trunks between the anterior and middle scalene muscles.

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Dexmedetomidine · Procedure: Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

  • Experimental
    Group B: PENB + SCPB-D (Combined Block)

    Patients receive a combined ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve block (PENB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) following general anesthesia induction. Total local anesthetic volume (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) and total dexmedetomidine dose (0.5 µg/kg, max 50 µg) are divided as follows: (1) PENB: 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with \~0.33 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (two-thirds total dose) injected in the interfascial plane between deltoid and subscapularis muscles; (2) SCPB: 5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with \~0.17 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (one-third total dose) injected between investing and prevertebral fasciae at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Dexmedetomidine · Procedure: Pericapsular Nerve Block plus Superficial Cervical Plexus Block

Interventions

  • 0.25% solution administered as a total volume of 15 mL per patient for regional nerve blockade prior to surgery.

    Also known as: Marcaine, Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

  • Perineural adjuvant added to bupivacaine at a total weight-adjusted dose of 0.5 µg/kg (maximum 50 µg) per patient to prolong block duration.

    Also known as: Precedex

  • ProcedureInterscalene Brachial Plexus Block

    Ultrasound-guided single-injection interscalene brachial plexus nerve block.

  • ProcedurePericapsular Nerve Block plus Superficial Cervical Plexus Block

    Ultrasound-guided dual-injection motor-sparing regional nerve block combination.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Fentanyl Consumption at 24 Hours

    Cumulative dose of intravenous rescue fentanyl (in micrograms) administered over the first 24 postoperative hours for pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale \> 3). Non-inferiority margin is pre-specified at 45 µg. A lower value indicates a better outcome (less pain/reduced opioid requirement).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis at 2 Hours

    Percentage of participants with diaphragmatic paralysis assessed via ultrasound M-mode excursion during deep inspiration (sniff/sigh maneuvers). Complete paralysis is defined as \>75% reduction in excursion, paradoxical movement, or immobility; partial paralysis is 25-75% reduction. Reported as the percentage of patients with partial or complete paralysis. A lower percentage indicates a better outcome (greater diaphragm preservation).

    Time frame: 2 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity Scores From 0 to 72 Hours

    Pain intensity assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain". Assessed at rest and movement across scheduled post-op time points. Lower scores indicate a better outcome (less pain).

    Time frame: Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

  2. Time to First Request for Rescue Analgesia

    Time elapsed (in minutes) from completion of block placement until the patient's first request for IV rescue fentanyl (NRS \> 3). A higher duration (longer time) indicates a better outcome (prolonged analgesic effect).

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours postoperatively

  3. Total 72-Hour Cumulative Opioid Consumption

    Total cumulative postoperative opioid consumption converted to oral Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) over 72 hours. A lower total value indicates a better outcome (reduced overall opioid exposure).

    Time frame: 72 hours postoperatively

  4. Quality of Recovery Score (QoR-15) at 24, 48, and 72 Hours

    Validated 15-item patient-reported questionnaire evaluating health status after surgery. Total score ranges from 0 to 150, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (superior overall quality of recovery).

    Time frame: Preoperatively (baseline), and at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

  5. Patient Satisfaction Score at 24 Hours

    Patient satisfaction measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Dissatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied). Higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater patient satisfaction).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  6. Incidence of Block-Related and Anesthesia Complications

    Number of participants experiencing adverse events including Horner syndrome, hoarseness, vascular puncture, nausea/vomiting, bradycardia (\<50 bpm), hypotension, or respiratory depression. A lower incidence/count indicates a better outcome (greater clinical safety).

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours postoperatively

  7. Length of PACU Stay and Time to Discharge Readiness

    Duration of PACU stay (in minutes) and time to meeting standardized discharge criteria (modified Aldrete score ≥ 9). Lower time durations indicate a better outcome (faster recovery and earlier discharge readiness).

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (including demography, diaphragmatic ultrasound excursion measurements, NRS pain scores, hourly rescue opioid consumption, and QoR-15 response scores) will be made available to qualified clinical research investigators following publication of the primary trial results. Data will be shared exclusively for scientific research purposes to support secondary analyses or meta-analyses.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will become available starting 6 months following publication of the primary manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal and will remain accessible for up to 36 months.

Access criteria: Access to de-identified IPD will be granted to qualified academic researchers upon submission of a formal research proposal and signed Data Use Agreement (DUA). Requests should be submitted directly to the principal investigator via email (Kmnmk87@med.bsu.edu.eg).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Apr 2027, 5 months later.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2027
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07926295
Responsible party
Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael (Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-suef university, Beni-Suef University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael, MD
Contact
Kmnmk87@med.bsu.edu.eg
00201288549959

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion