ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07928791Updated Nov 10, 2026

PCV-VG Versus VCV Through the I-gel in Young Children

An interventional study of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee (PCV-VG) and Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) in General Aneshesia, Intraoperative Complications and Gastric Insufflation, sponsored by Beni-Suef University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Beni-Suef University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) like the i-gel are frequently used to manage airways during general anesthesia in children. However, delivering positive-pressure mechanical ventilation through a supraglottic airway carries a risk of gas leaking around the cuff into the stomach (gastric insufflation), which can cause stomach distension and increase the risk of regurgitation.

Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) delivers a fixed breath volume, which can cause spikes in peak inspiratory pressure if airway resistance changes, potentially exceeding the device seal and forcing air into the stomach. Pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guarantee (PCV-VG) uses closed-loop feedback to auto-titrate inspiratory pressure breath-by-breath to target the desired tidal volume while minimizing peak airway pressures.

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether PCV-VG offers superior ventilatory efficacy (accurate tidal volume delivery) and enhanced gastric safety (lower incidence of ultrasonographically detected gastric insufflation) compared to VCV when using the i-gel supraglottic airway in children aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective non-laparoscopic surgery

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale:

Controlled positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) via second-generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) such as the i-gel is widely practiced in pediatric anesthesia. However, because SADs do not provide an absolute tracheal seal, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) exceeding the individual oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) risks gas bypassing the cuff into the esophagus. Gastric insufflation increases intra-abdominal pressure, restricts diaphragmatic excursion, and elevates the risk of aspiration. Pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guarantee (PCV-VG) combines a decelerating flow profile with breath-by-breath feedback to deliver target tidal volume at the lowest feasible PIP. While studied in laparoscopic settings, prospective evidence evaluating PCV-VG versus VCV using serial radiologist-performed gastric antrum ultrasonography in non-laparoscopic pediatric surgery remains lacking.

Objectives:

To compare PCV-VG against VCV in children aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective non-laparoscopic surgery with the i-gel across two co-primary domains:

Ventilatory efficacy: mean expired tidal volume (VTe) delivery relative to ideal body weight target.

Gastric safety: incidence of ultrasonographically confirmed gastric insufflation (antral cross-sectional area [CSA] increase ≥ 20% from baseline).

Trial Design \& Interventions:

A prospective, single-center, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized superiority trial conducted at Beni-Suef University Hospital. Ninety children (2-7 years, weight 10-25 kg, ASA I-II) scheduled for elective non-laparoscopic procedures under general anesthesia with i-gel placement will be randomized 1:1 to:

Group PCV-VG (n = 45): Target VT 6-7 mL/kg IBW, PEEP 4 cmH2O, I:E 1:2, respiratory rate adjusted to EtCO2 35-45 mmHg, with closed-loop pressure adjustment capped at baseline OLP minus 3 cmH2O (absolute maximum 20 cmH2O).

Group VCV (n = 45): Target VT 6-7 mL/kg IBW with constant square inspiratory flow, identical PEEP, I:E, and RR targets, without active leak compensation.

Ultrasonic Evaluation Protocol:

A blinded consultant radiologist will perform serial sagittal gastric antrum ultrasonography at three defined timepoints:

T0: Immediately post-i-gel placement (baseline) T1: 20 minutes post-initiation of mechanical ventilation T2: End of surgery (pre-emergence) Antral cross-sectional area (CSA) will be calculated via the ellipse formula (π × D1 × D2 / 4). A positive gastric insufflation event is defined as a post-baseline CSA increase ≥ 20% confirmed on at least 2 of 3 measurements.

02

Conditions studied

  • General Aneshesia
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Gastric Insufflation
  • Airway Management

Keywords

  • Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation
  • PCV-VG
  • Volume-Controlled Ventilation
  • VCV
  • i-gel
  • Supraglottic Airway Device
  • Pediatric Anesthesia
  • Gastric Ultrasonography
  • Antral Cross-Sectional Area
03

In context

Intraoperative Complications

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraoperative Complications; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 67 across 48 interventional studies indexed under Intraoperative Complications.

Browse Intraoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Beni-Suef University is the lead sponsor of 349 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2 to 7 years inclusive
  • Body weight 10 to 25 kg inclusive
  • (ASA) physical status classification I or II
  • Scheduled for elective non-laparoscopic surgical procedures of anticipated duration 30 to 120 minutes, not involving the airway, head, or neck (e.g., orthopedic, urological, perineal, or minor extremity procedures)
  • Suitability for i-gel supraglottic airway management under controlled positive-pressure ventilation, as judged by the attending anesthesiologist
  • Written obtained from a parent or legal guardian, and age-appropriate assent obtained from children aged ≥ 7 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipated or known difficult airway (history of failed supraglottic airway device insertion, syndromic anatomical airway anomalies, Mallampati class IV, or inter-incisor gap \< 20 mm)
  • Active upper or lower respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks prior to surgery
  • Reactive airway disease (asthma or bronchiolitis) with active wheeze or exacerbation within 4 weeks
  • Obesity: (BMI) ≥ 97th centile for age and sex according to WHO Child Growth Standards (2006)
  • Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, symptomatic hiatus hernia, or any other condition conferring elevated pulmonary aspiration risk
  • Congenital or acquired pulmonary disease (e.g., chronic lung disease of prematurity, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease)
  • Significant cardiovascular disease ( ≥ III)
  • Neuromuscular disease affecting respiratory mechanics
  • Surgical procedure requiring prone, lateral decubitus, or head-down (Trendelenburg > 15°) positioning
  • Emergency or semi-elective surgical cases
  • Known allergy or documented to any anesthetic agent used in the protocol (propofol, sevoflurane, fentanyl, atracurium)
  • Laparoscopic surgical procedure
  • Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial within the preceding 30 days
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group PCV-VG (Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee)

    Patients in this group will receive mechanical ventilation using Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee (PCV-VG; Draeger AutoFlow or platform equivalent) through an i-gel supraglottic airway device following standard intravenous induction and muscle relaxation with atracurium. Ventilation parameters: Target tidal volume (VT) set at 6-7 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW), PEEP 4 cmH2O, I:E ratio 1:2, and age-stratified respiratory rate adjusted to maintain EtCO2 at 35-45 mmHg. The closed-loop algorithm dynamically auto-titrates inspiratory pressure (Pinsp) breath-by-breath based on the previous breath's expired tidal volume (VTe) to achieve target VT, with Pinsp safety ceiling capped at the individual baseline oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) minus 3 cmH2O (absolute maximum 20 cmH2O).

    Procedure: Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee (PCV-VG)

  • Active comparator
    Group VCV (Volume-Controlled Ventilation)

    Patients in this group will receive standard mechanical ventilation using Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV) through an i-gel supraglottic airway device following standard intravenous induction and muscle relaxation with atracurium. Ventilation parameters: Set tidal volume (VT) programmed at 6-7 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW) with a constant square inspiratory flow waveform, PEEP 4 cmH2O, I:E ratio 1:2, and age-stratified respiratory rate adjusted to maintain EtCO2 at 35-45 mmHg. No active closed-loop leak-compensation or pressure-guarantee algorithm is engaged. Peak inspiratory pressure safety limit is set at baseline OLP minus 3 cmH2O (absolute maximum 20 cmH2O). If VTe falls \> 20% below set VT for ≥ 3 consecutive breaths, VT may be up-titrated in 0.5 mL/kg IBW increments up to maximum 9 mL/kg IBW provided peak pressure remains below OLP.

    Procedure: Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV)

Interventions

  • ProcedurePressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume Guarantee (PCV-VG)

    Administration of closed-loop pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guarantee via the i-gel supraglottic airway, maintaining target VT 6-7 mL/kg IBW with breath-by-breath inspiratory pressure auto-titration.

    Also known as: PCV-VG

  • ProcedureVolume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV)

    Administration of traditional volume-controlled ventilation with constant inspiratory flow via the i-gel supraglottic airway, maintaining set VT 6-7 mL/kg IBW without automated pressure adaptation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Expired Tidal Volume (VTe) Delivery Accuracy

    Measured in milliliters per kilogram of ideal body weight (mL/kg IBW) using the anesthesia workstation flow sensor. Evaluates delivery accuracy relative to the prescribed target (6.0-7.0 mL/kg IBW). Values within the target prescribed range (6.0-7.0 mL/kg IBW) indicate a good result (effective alveolar ventilation). Values significantly below target (\< 5.0 mL/kg IBW) indicate a bad result (hypoventilation due to circuit leak), while values above target (\> 8.0 mL/kg IBW) indicate a bad result (risk of volutrauma).

    Time frame: Measured at 20 minutes post-initiation of mechanical ventilation (T1) and at end of surgery / pre-emergence (T2, up to 120 minutes)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Ultrasonographically Confirmed Gastric Insufflation

    Defined as an increase in serial radiologist-measured gastric antrum cross-sectional area (CSA) ≥ 20% from baseline (T0), confirmed on ≥ 2 of 3 measurements at either T1 or T2, calculated using the ellipse formula: CSA=(π × D1 × D2)/4 A lower percentage indicates a good result (enhanced gastric safety and effective airway seal). A higher percentage indicates a bad result (increased risk of gastric distension, elevated intra-abdominal pressure, and pulmonary aspiration).

    Time frame: Intraoperative period (assessed at 20 minutes post-ventilation [T1] and end of surgery [T2], up to 120 minutes total)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Peak Inspiratory Pressure (Ppeak)

    Peak airway pressure measured in centimeters of water (cmH2O) directly from the anesthesia workstation pressure transducer. A lower value indicates a good result (reduced risk of barotrauma and lower potential to exceed oropharyngeal leak pressure). A higher value indicates a bad result (increased pulmonary barotrauma risk and higher likelihood of driving gas into the esophagus).

    Time frame: Measured at 20 minutes post-initiation of mechanical ventilation (T1) and at end of surgery / pre-emergence (T2, up to 120 minutes)

  2. Mean Dynamic Respiratory System Compliance (Cdyn)

    Calculated using the formula: Cdyn= (VTe) ÷(Ppeak-PEEP), expressed in mL/cmH2O. A higher value indicates a good result (superior lung/thoracic compliance and lower resistance to inflation). A lower value indicates a bad result (stiffer lungs, higher airway resistance, or increased impedance).

    Time frame: Measured at 20 minutes post-initiation of mechanical ventilation (T1) and at end of surgery / pre-emergence (T2, up to 120 minutes)

  3. Mean Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP)

    Airway pressure in cmH2O at which an anterior cervical leak is detected on precordial auscultation during circuit occlusion. A higher value indicates a good result (a tighter perilaryngeal device seal capable of sustaining higher positive pressure without leaking). A lower value indicates a bad result (poor device seal and higher risk of leak).

    Time frame: Measured immediately post-i-gel placement (T0) and at 20 minutes post-initiation of mechanical ventilation (T1)

  4. Mean End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2) Concentration

    Measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) using continuous side-stream capnography on the anesthesia workstation to assess systemic ventilation status and carbon dioxide elimination. Directional Interpretation: Values within the physiological target range (35-45 mmHg) indicate a good result (optimal normocapnic ventilation). Values significantly above target (\> 45 mmHg) indicate a bad result (hypercapnia/hypoventilation due to circuit leak or dead-space rebreathing), while values below target (\< 30 mmHg) indicate a bad result (hypocapnia due to hyperventilation).

    Time frame: Measured at T0 (post-i-gel placement), T1 (20 minutes post-ventilation start), T2 (end of surgery), and at emergence / i-gel removal (up to 120 minutes)

  5. Percentage of Total Mechanical Ventilation Time With Hypercapnia (EtCO2 > 50 mmHg)

    Percentage calculated as: 100 × \[(Duration of mechanical ventilation with EtCO2 \> 50 mmHg)÷(Total Mechanical Ventilation Time)\]. A lower percentage (ideally 0%) indicates a good result (effective carbon dioxide clearance throughout the surgical procedure). A higher percentage indicates a bad result (sustained alveolar hypoventilation or persistent leak leading to carbon dioxide retention).

    Time frame: Total duration of mechanical ventilation (up to 120 minutes)

  6. Percentage of Mechanical Breaths Exceeding Baseline Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure

    Percentage calculated as: 100 × \[(Breaths where Ppeak)\> (Baseline OLP)÷ (Total Mechanical Breaths)\]. A lower value (ideally 0%) indicates a good result (effective pressure containment within safe seal thresholds). A higher value indicates a bad result (frequent pressure spikes above the seal threshold, driving air into the stomach).

    Time frame: Entire duration of mechanical ventilation (up to 120 minutes)

  7. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Intraoperative Respiratory Adverse Events

    Composite incidence of laryngospasm, bronchospasm, oxygen desaturation (SpO2 \< 93%), i-gel displacement, or endotracheal intubation conversion. A lower percentage indicates a good result (superior airway safety and stability). A higher percentage indicates a bad result (increased perioperative respiratory complications).

    Time frame: From i-gel insertion until PACU transfer (up to 180 minutes)

  8. i-gel Insertion Time

    Time in seconds from first device handling until capnographic confirmation of airway placement. A lower value indicates a good result (faster, smoother airway securing). A higher value indicates a bad result (prolonged or difficult device placement).

    Time frame: At time of airway placement (induction period, approximately 1-3 minutes)

  9. Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Length of Stay

    PACU entry to achieving a modified Aldrete Score ≥ 9/10. A lower value indicates a good result (faster recovery and readiness for ward transfer). A higher value indicates a bad result (delayed recovery or lingering anesthetic effects).

    Time frame: Postoperative recovery period (up to 120 minutes)

  10. Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Airway Complications at 24 Hours

    Composite incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, or dysphagia assessed at 24 hours via telephone. A lower percentage indicates a good result (minimal airway mucosal trauma). A higher percentage indicates a bad result (higher postoperative airway morbidity).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual participant data (including de-identified baseline demographic characteristics, primary and secondary outcome measure measurements, and ultrasonographic antral cross-sectional area calculations) will be made available to qualified academic researchers upon reasonable written request to the principal investigator, following publication of the primary trial results in a peer-reviewed journal.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will become available starting 6 months following primary journal publication and will remain accessible for up to 36 months post-publication.

Access criteria: Data requests must be submitted directly to the Principal Investigator (Dr. Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael) via Kmnmk87@med.bsu.edu.eg. Requesters must provide a scientifically sound research proposal and sign a formal Data Use Agreement (DUA). Data will be shared via secure cloud transfer.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07928791
Responsible party
Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael (Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-suef university, Beni-Suef University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael, MD
Contact
Kmnmk87@med.bsu.edu.eg
00201288549959

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion