An observational study in Geriatric, sponsored by Beni-Suef University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.
Sponsored by Beni-Suef University · Observational
This study aims to assess the barriers, service capacity, infrastructure, workforce preparedness, and policy-related factors affecting the delivery of geriatric rehabilitation services in Egypt. As the Egyptian population ages, the demand for rehabilitation services for older adults continues to increase; however, limited information is available regarding the readiness of the healthcare system to meet these needs. This national cross-sectional survey will collect data from rehabilitation professionals, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, and rehabilitation administrators, to evaluate workforce training, service availability, equipment and infrastructure adequacy, accessibility challenges, and policy support for geriatric rehabilitation. Findings will help identify priority areas for workforce development, healthcare planning, and policy improvement to strengthen geriatric rehabilitation services across Egypt.
Population aging is one of the most important demographic changes worldwide, with the number of people aged 60 years and older increasing rapidly. In Egypt, growing healthcare demands associated with aging require healthcare systems to expand and adapt rehabilitation services to address age-related conditions such as stroke, frailty, musculoskeletal disorders, falls, and chronic disease-related disability. Evidence indicates that geriatric rehabilitation can improve functional independence, reduce hospital readmissions, enhance quality of life, and decrease long-term healthcare costs. However, specialized geriatric rehabilitation services remain limited in many developing healthcare systems, including Egypt.
Previous studies have identified several barriers to effective geriatric rehabilitation, including insufficient workforce training, lack of specialized equipment and assistive technologies, inadequate awareness among patients and healthcare providers, financial constraints, and limited insurance coverage. Despite increasing demand for services, little national-level information exists regarding infrastructure, workforce readiness, service availability, and accessibility of geriatric rehabilitation services in Egypt. Most available evidence is institution-specific and does not provide a comprehensive overview of the national situation.
This study will employ a national cross-sectional survey design using a structured self-administered questionnaire. Eligible participants will include physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, and rehabilitation center administrators or managers who are currently practicing in Egypt and involved in rehabilitation service delivery. The survey will be distributed through professional societies, university hospitals, private healthcare networks, and Ministry of Health rehabilitation facilities using a multi-channel recruitment strategy designed to achieve representation across geographic regions and healthcare sectors.
The questionnaire will assess five major domains: demographic and professional characteristics, clinical workload, geriatric rehabilitation capacity, barriers to service delivery, and workforce training and policy support. Specific areas of investigation will include workforce competencies, availability of rehabilitation programs, use of standardized assessment tools, adequacy of equipment and assistive technologies, accessibility of facilities, waiting times, geographical disparities, patient adherence challenges, financial barriers, policy awareness, and organizational collaboration.
A target sample of at least 370 completed responses will be sought to provide adequate statistical power and representativeness. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods to identify differences across professional groups, healthcare sectors, and geographic regions. Qualitative responses will undergo thematic analysis to identify common perceptions and recommendations regarding service improvement.
The primary objective of the study is to systematically assess health system, workforce, infrastructural, and policy-related barriers affecting the accessibility and delivery of geriatric rehabilitation services in Egypt. Secondary objectives include evaluating workforce training and preparedness, assessing infrastructure and equipment availability, identifying urban-rural and public-private disparities in service provision, examining barriers to access and continuity of care, investigating policy and funding mechanisms, and identifying priority strategies for improving geriatric rehabilitation from the perspective of frontline rehabilitation professionals. The findings are expected to support evidence-based workforce planning, healthcare policy development, and strategic investment in geriatric rehabilitation services in Egypt.
Beni-Suef University is the lead sponsor of 349 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population includes physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, rehabilitation physicians, and rehabilitation administrators/managers currently practicing in Egypt and involved in rehabilitation service delivery, management, or planning across public, private, academic, and community healthcare settings.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Mean Perceived Barrier Severity Score Assessed Using the Geriatric Rehabilitation Barriers Questionnaire
Composite barrier severity score derived from responses to 13 barriers to geriatric rehabilitation service delivery, including workforce shortages, inadequate equipment, financial constraints, transportation difficulties, insurance limitations, awareness deficits, cultural barriers, and tele-rehabilitation limitations. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = Not a Barrier to 3 = Severe Barrier). Higher scores indicate greater perceived barriers to geriatric rehabilitation service provision.
Time frame: baseline
Workforce Readiness and Geriatric Rehabilitation Training Score Measured Using the Workforce Preparedness Domain of the Geriatric Rehabilitation Survey
Assessed from participant responses regarding formal geriatric rehabilitation education, certification, workshop attendance, policy awareness, and perceived governmental and professional support. Higher scores indicate greater workforce preparedness for delivery of geriatric rehabilitation services.
Time frame: baseline
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 6 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.