ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07910539Updated Nov 2, 2026

Comparison of the Need Of Mechanical Ventilation Between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) and Conventional INSURE (Intubation-Surfactant Administration-Extubation) Methods in Spontaneously Breathing Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

An interventional study of Intervention Name: Poractant alfa (surfactant) administered by the INSURE method in Preterm Infants, Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Need for Mechanical Ventilation, sponsored by Fatima Jinnah Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Fatima Jinnah Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2023, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

**Brief Summary of the Study**

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the need for mechanical ventilation between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) and the conventional INSURE (Intubation, Surfactant Administration, and Extubation) method in spontaneously breathing preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. The study will be conducted in the Department of Neonatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, with a total sample size of 90 preterm infants born before 35 weeks of gestation. Participants will be allocated to either the LISA group or the INSURE group, with 45 infants in each group. The primary outcome will be the need for mechanical ventilation following surfactant administration, assessed within three hours of treatment. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, with the chi-square test used to compare the need for mechanical ventilation between the two groups. The findings are expected to help identify the more effective surfactant administration method in reducing the need for mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Infants
  • Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Need for Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Preterm Infants
  • Neonatal Respiratory Care,
  • Surfactant Administration,
  • Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA),
  • INSURE Method
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is close to the median of 90 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn studies →

Lead sponsor

Fatima Jinnah Medical University is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Preterm infants born before 35 weeks of gestation.
  2. Infants diagnosed with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome based on clinical and radiological criteria.
  3. Infants whose parents provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants who required intubation during resuscitation after birth.
  2. Infants whose parents do not provide written .
  3. Infants born with congenital malformations or defects.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental - LISA

    Drug: Intervention Name: Poractant alfa (surfactant) administered by the INSURE method

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator - INSURE

    Active Comparator - INSURE

    Drug: Intervention Name: Poractant alfa (surfactant) administered by the INSURE method

Interventions

  • DrugIntervention Name: Poractant alfa (surfactant) administered by the INSURE method

    Surfactant will be administered at a dose of 100 mg/kg using a 6 Fr nasogastric tube. Under direct laryngoscopic visualization, the catheter will be passed 1-2 cm beyond the vocal cords. Surfactant will be administered in small aliquots over 1-3 minutes while the infant continues spontaneous breathing on nasal CPAP. Nasal CPAP will be maintained during and after the procedure. The infant will be intubated and surfactant will be administered through an endotracheal tube at a dose of 100 mg/kg in 2-3 aliquots while receiving positive-pressure ventilation through a T-piece circuit. After 15-20 minutes of positive-pressure ventilation, the endotracheal tube will be removed and the infant will be placed on nasal CPAP.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Need for Mechanical Ventilation

    Proportion of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation after surfactant administration, comparing the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) group with the conventional INSURE group. Mechanical ventilation will be required if the infant needs an FiO₂ greater than 0.40 after surfactant administration.

    Time frame: Within 3 hours after surfactant administration

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fatima Jinnah Medical University
    Lahore, 54780, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 13 months.

Of 35 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 40. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartActual
May 25, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jun 25, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2024
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07910539
Lead sponsor
Fatima Jinnah Medical University
Responsible party
Humaira Waseem (Ms Humaira Waseem, Fatima Jinnah Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
May 25, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 25, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2024
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion