ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06999135Updated May 31, 2025

Comparison of Silodosin and Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy in Patients With Ureteral Stones

An interventional study of Silodosin in Tamsulosin, Silodosin and Medical Expulsive Therapy, sponsored by Fatima Jinnah Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-31.

Sponsored by Fatima Jinnah Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2023, registered Apr 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the effectiveness and side effect profiles of Tamsulosin and Silodosin in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteric stones. Conducted as a randomized control trial at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, 180 patients were analyzed-89 on Tamsulosin and 93 on Silodosin. Results showed that Silodosin had a higher stone expulsion rate, especially within 14 days, and fewer side effects compared to Tamsulosin. Common side effects included orthostatic hypotension, abnormal ejaculation, and headaches, with Silodosin showing a better overall safety profile.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial conducted at the Urology Department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, over a period of 12 months. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and written informed consent was secured from all participants.

Participants included adults aged 18 to 60 years with a single, unilateral ureteric stone measuring 5 to 10 mm, confirmed by non-contrast CT scan. Patients with a history of ureteral surgery, congenital anomalies, severe renal impairment (serum creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL), pregnancy, lactation, urinary tract infection, or those using calcium channel blockers or other alpha-blockers were excluded. A total of 180 eligible patients were randomized into two groups: 89 patients received Tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily, while 93 patients received Silodosin 8 mg daily.

Both groups received standard analgesia with diclofenac sodium 50 mg as needed and were advised to maintain adequate hydration. Treatment continued until stone expulsion or for a maximum of 28 days. Patients were monitored weekly through clinical evaluation and imaging (ultrasound or X-ray), and adverse events such as dizziness, ejaculatory dysfunction, and headaches were recorded using standardized questionnaires.

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, while categorical variables were assessed with Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tamsulosin
  • Silodosin
  • Medical Expulsive Therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fatima Jinnah Medical University is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between ages 18 years - 55 years.
  • Solitary unilateral ureteral stone
  • Stone sizes less than 10 mm measured on non-contrast computed tomography of kidney, ureter and bladder.
  • Stones being treated primarily with medical expulsive therapy
  • Radio opaque Stone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Untreated UTI
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Obstruction distal to stone
  • Serum Creatinine > 1.3 mg/dl in males and > 1.2 mg/dl in females.
  • Congenital renal anomaly/ skeletal malformation
  • Previous treatment for the same stone (PCNL/ URS / push back)
  • Solitary Kidney
  • Prior JJ stent insertion
  • Bilateral ureteral stone
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TAMSULOSIN

    Tamsulosin is an alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blocker commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by relaxing the smooth muscles in the prostate and bladder neck. In the context of medical expulsive therapy (MET), it helps facilitate the passage of ureteric stones by relaxing the smooth muscles of the lower ureter, reducing ureteric spasm, and easing stone expulsion. It is widely used due to its effectiveness and relatively well-tolerated side effect profile.

    Drug: Silodosin

  • Experimental
    Silodosin

    Silodosin is used as a medical expulsive therapy (MET) to facilitate the passage of distal ureteral stones, particularly those sized between 4 to 10 mm. It works by selectively blocking alpha-1A adrenergic receptors in the ureter, relaxing the smooth muscle, which helps stones pass more easily and quickly.

    Drug: Silodosin

Interventions

  • Silodosin is an oral medication primarily used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by relaxing the muscles in the prostate and bladder neck to improve urine flow. It belongs to a class of drugs called alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists, which block receptors responsible for muscle contraction in these areas. This action helps relieve symptoms such as difficulty urinating, urgency, and weak urine stream. Silodosin is taken once daily with food and is known for its high selectivity for alpha-1A receptors, contributing to its effectiveness and safety profile

    Also known as: Sildat, Sildoso

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. STONE EXPULSION RATE

    This measure evaluates the proportion of patients who pass ureteral stones within specific time frames (0-14 days, 15-21 days, and 22-28 days) when treated with Silodosin versus Tamsulosin.

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

  2. TIME TO STONE EXPULSION

    Number of days from treatment initiation to confirmed stone passage, measured by imaging and patient report.

    Time frame: 6MONTHS

Secondary outcomes

  1. INCIDENCE OF ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION

    Percentage of patients experiencing orthostatic hypotension, measured by clinical blood pressure monitoring.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Incidence of Abnormal Ejaculation

    Percentage of patients reporting abnormal ejaculation, assessed via patient questionnaires.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Incidence of Headache Percentage of patients reporting headaches, assessed via patient questionnaires.

    Percentage of patients reporting headaches, assessed via patient questionnaires.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Analgesic Requirement:

    Percentage of patients requiring analgesics during treatment, recorded from prescription or patient report.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Need for Auxiliary Procedures

    Percentage of patients requiring interventions such as ureteroscopy or lithotripsy, documented from clinical records.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Stone Position and Laterality

    : Distribution of stone location (proximal, mid, distal ureter) and side (right or left), determined by imaging.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Symptom Duration Prior to CT:

    Categorized duration of symptoms before diagnosis, collected from patient history.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. BMI

    Measurement: Categorized as Normal or Obese based on standard BMI thresholds (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fatima Jinnah Medical University
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Itoh Y, Okada A, Yasui T, Hamamoto S, Hirose M, Kojima Y, Tozawa K, Sasaki S, Kohri K. Efficacy of selective alpha1A adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin in the medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. Int J Urol. 2011 Sep;18(9):672-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02810.x. Epub 2011 Jun 26. PubMed 21707766 ↗
  • Thongprayoon C, Krambeck AE, Rule AD. Determining the true burden of kidney stone disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Dec;16(12):736-746. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0320-7. Epub 2020 Aug 4. PubMed 32753740 ↗
  • Kino M, Hayashi T, Hino D, Nakada T, Kitoh H, Akakura K. Patients' poor performance status is an independent risk factor for urosepsis induced by kidney and ureteral stones. Urolithiasis. 2021 Oct;49(5):477-484. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01256-4. Epub 2021 Mar 23. PubMed 33755744 ↗
  • 17. REHMAN I, KHAN H, FAROOQ A, MAHMOOD A, DIN QAM, HABIB B. Study on Uroliths Composition in Tertiary Care Hospital of Pakistan. Magnesium. 2021;7:18-9.
  • Halinski A, Bhatti KH, Boeri L, Cloutier J, Davidoff K, Elqady A, Fryad G, Gadelmoula M, Hui H, Petkova K, Popov E, Rawa B, Saltirov I, Spivacow FR, Belthangady Monu Zeeshan Hameed, Trinchieri A, Buchholz N. Stone composition of renal stone formers from different global regions. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021 Oct 1;93(3):307-312. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2021.3.307. PubMed 34839635 ↗
  • Hsu YP, Hsu CW, Bai CH, Cheng SW, Chen KC, Chen C. Silodosin versus tamsulosin for medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0203035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203035. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30153301 ↗
  • Rahman MJ, Faridi MS, Mibang N, Singh RS. Comparing tamsulosin, silodosin versus silodosin plus tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric stones: A randomised trial. Arab J Urol. 2017 Dec 24;16(2):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.012. eCollection 2018 Jun. PubMed 29892490 ↗
  • Sharma G, Pareek T, Kaundal P, Tyagi S, Singh S, Yashaswi T, Devan SK, Sharma AP. Comparison of efficacy of three commonly used alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Sep-Oct;48(5):742-759. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0548. PubMed 34003612 ↗
  • Malin JM Jr, Deane RF, Boyarsky S. Characterisation of adrenergic receptors in human ureter. Br J Urol. 1970 Apr;42(2):171-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1970.tb10018.x. No abstract available. PubMed 5420156 ↗
  • Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1915-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9. PubMed 9334635 ↗
  • Ibrahim AI, Shetty SD, Awad RM, Patel KP. Prognostic factors in the conservative treatment of ureteric stones. Br J Urol. 1991 Apr;67(4):358-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15161.x. PubMed 2032074 ↗
  • Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Geraghty R, Skolarikos A, Papatsoris A, Liatsikos E, Somani BK. Trends of 'urolithiasis: interventions, simulation, and laser technology' over the last 16 years (2000-2015) as published in the literature (PubMed): a systematic review from European section of Uro-technology (ESUT). World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1651-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2055-z. Epub 2017 Jun 7. PubMed 28593477 ↗
  • Hughes T, Ho HC, Pietropaolo A, Somani BK. Guideline of guidelines for kidney and bladder stones. Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S104-S112. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20315. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PubMed 33052834 ↗
  • Strohmaier WL, Wrobel BM, Schubert G. Overweight, insulin resistance and blood pressure (parameters of the metabolic syndrome) in uric acid urolithiasis. Urol Res. 2012 Apr;40(2):171-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0403-9. Epub 2011 Aug 25. PubMed 21866382 ↗
  • Ahmed AF, Al-Sayed AY. Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study. Korean J Urol. 2010 Mar;51(3):193-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.193. Epub 2010 Mar 19. PubMed 20414396 ↗
  • Soliman MG, El-Gamal O, El-Gamal S, Abdel Raheem A, Abou-Ramadan A, El-Abd A. Silodosin versus Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Children with Lower-Third Ureteric Stones: Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):568-573. doi: 10.1159/000513074. Epub 2021 Feb 1. PubMed 33524970 ↗
  • Morita T, Wada I, Saeki H, Tsuchida S, Weiss RM. Ureteral urine transport: changes in bolus volume, peristaltic frequency, intraluminal pressure and volume of flow resulting from autonomic drugs. J Urol. 1987 Jan;137(1):132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43904-8. PubMed 3795356 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Jul 23, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 6 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 17, 2025
First posted
May 31, 2025
StartActual
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2024
CompletionActual
Aug 15, 2024
Last update
May 31, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06999135
Lead sponsor
Fatima Jinnah Medical University
Responsible party
DR FAIZA KHAN (ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, Fatima Jinnah Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 31, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2024
Completion
Aug 15, 2024
Last update
May 31, 2025

Study contacts

PROF MUNIZA QAYYUM, PHD PHARMACOLOGY
study chair · FATIMA JINNAH MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Silodosin

Start the discussion